Benefits and challenges of online collaborative learning from the perspectives of non-traditional event management students: a comparison between asynchronous and synchronous learning

References

• Abbas, T. M. (2016). Predictors of satisfaction among nontraditional students in tourism and hospitality higher education: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 28(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2016.1189830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. J., & Trespalacios, J. (2017). Evaluation instruments and good practices in online education. Online Learning, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.913
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J., & Adler, H. (1997). Using role play in hospitality sales courses. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 9(2), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.1997.10685308
   Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Weiser, O., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2017). How do medium naturalness and personality traits shape academic achievement and perceived learning? An experimental study of face-to-face and synchronous e-learning. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1974
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025008037
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 1–25. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecil, A., Fenich, G. G., Krugman, C., & Hashimoto, K. (2013). Review and analysis of the new international meeting and business events competency standards. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 14(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2012.755830
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Lambert, M. (2019). Motivational influences for higher education (HE) students. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 9(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A., & Weber, M. R. (2010). Leadership and teams, an assessment within the hospitality management classroom. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10(4), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2010.525952
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34. doi:10.24059/olj.v5i1.1885.
   Google Scholar
• Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N. J. (2007). Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Mediating the mechanisms which make collaborative learning sometimes effective. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 131–146. https://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.2.8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4).
   Google Scholar
• Fadhilah, M., Sutrisna, S., Muslimah, S. N., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). An exploring method in online learning: Synchronous and asynchronous. Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 74–81. doi:10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.55.
   Google Scholar
• Fellenz, M. R. (2006). Toward fairness in assessing student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 570–591. doi:10.1177/1052562906286713.
   Google Scholar
• Georganas, S., Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2015). Peer pressure and productivity: The role of observing and being observed. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 223–232. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowacki-Dudka, M. (2019). How to engage nontraditional adult learners through popular education in higher education. Adult Learning, 30(2), 84–86. doi:10.1177/1045159519833998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomezelj, D., & Čivre, Ž. (2012). Tourism graduate students’ satisfaction with online learning. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 60(2), 159–174. https://hrcak.srce.hr/84561.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2004). Computer-mediated learning groups: Benefits and challenges to using group work in online learning environments. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 181–214). Information Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25(6), 660–684. doi:10.1177/105256290102500605.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45(7), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junek, O., Lockstone, L., & Mair, J. (2009). Two perspectives on event management employment: Student and employer insights into the skills required to get the job done! Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.120
   Google Scholar
• Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., & Yuan, G. (2017). Online collaborative learning activities: The perspectives of minority graduate students. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 5–28 doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Marnburg, E., Øgaard, T., & Okumus, F. (2021). Exploring antecedents of social loafing in students’ group work: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 28, 100314. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia, C., & Phelan, K. V. (2014). Academic referent group influences on hospitality students’ intentions to enroll in an online course. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2014.900378
   Google Scholar
• Mejia, C. (2020). Using VoiceThread as a discussion platform to enhance student engagement in a hospitality management online course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 26, 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. T., & Lu, M.-Y. (2003). Serving non-traditional students in e-learning environments: Building successful communities in the virtual campus. Educational Media International, 40(1/2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952398032000092206
   Google Scholar
• Mohsen, M., & Anter, M. (2021). The Impact of online learning on post-secondary students in Canada post-COVID-19: A case study on hospitality and tourism students. Journal of the Faculty of Tourism and Hotels-University of Sadat City, 5(2/1), 95–107 https://web.archive.org/web/20220224042417id_/https://mfth.journals.ekb.eg/article_212909_3cc6cee7402e5f2dc5c6541abcd4d412.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In Advanced research methods for applied psychology 1 (pp. 211–223). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2021). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971420947738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. A., & Hahn, S. (2015). Effects of simulation on student satisfaction with a capstone course. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2015.998911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rannastu-Avalos, M., & Siiman, L. A. (2020). Challenges for distance learning and online collaboration in the time of COVID-19: Interviews with science teachers. International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. 128–142. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, L., Guan, J., & Tavitiyaman, P. (2022). What frustrates hospitality students at the mandatory synchronous online classes? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 34(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1963971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ro, H., & Choi, Y. (2011). Student team project: Gender differences in team project experience and attitudes toward team-based work. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 11(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2011.575022
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. S., & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257–268 https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.4.257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. (2011). Traditional practice for non‐traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy in higher education retention. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.540320
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. (2017). Care, communication, support: Core for designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), . https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183775/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A. (2021). What student support practitioners know about non-traditional students: A practice-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1946015
   Google Scholar
• Seo, S., & Kim(Jenny), H. J. (2021). How COVID-19 influences hospitality and tourism education: Challenges, opportunities, and new directions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1929531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severt, K., Fjelstul, J., & Breiter, D. (2013). Information communication technologies: Usages and preferences of Generation Y students and meeting professionals. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 14(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2013.781487
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. C. (2019). Innovative applications of online pedagogy and course design. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 15(2 88–107).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavitiyaman, P., Ren, L., & Fung, C. (2021). Hospitality students at the online classes during COVID-19–How personality affects experience? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 28, 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesone, D. V., Alexakis, G., & Platt, A. (2003). Distance learning programs for non-traditional and traditional students in the business disciplines. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(4), 9–20 http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/tesone64.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-W. (2015). The effect of online co-regulated learning in the implementation of team-based learning on improving students’ involvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1270–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., Ni, A. Y., Ready, D., & Shayo, C. (2020). Factors leading to online learner satisfaction. Business Education Innovation Journal, 12(1), 14–24 http://www.beijournal.com/images/V12_N1_final_9_11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., & Huang, K. (2014). The role of beliefs and motivation in asynchronous online learning in college-level classes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.3.b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
   Google Scholar
• Zakariah, Z., Hashim, R. A., & Musa, N. (2016). Motivation, experience and satisfaction among adult learners with fully online web-based courses http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2548.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136 https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.1.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar