Influence of Electric Field Operation Modes on Nickel Migration during Electrokinetic Treatment

References

• Acar, Y. B., and Alshawabkeh, A. N. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci.Technol. 27, 2638–2647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM. D7100–11.2011. Standard Test Method for Hydraulic Conductivity Compatibility Testing of Soils with Aqueous Solutions, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ATSDR. 2005. Toxicological Profile for Nickel, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Bettiol, C., Stievano, L., Bertelle, M., Delfino, F., and Argese, E. 2008. Evaluation of microwave-assisted acid extraction procedures for the determination of metal content and potential bioavailability in sediments. Appl. Geochem. 23, 1140–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) Ammonium Replacement Method. 2003. WCC-103 Publication, WREP-125, 2nd ed. Available at: http://isnap.oregonstate.edu/WERA103/Methods/WCC-103-Manual-2003-Soil%20CEC.PDF. Accessed March 3, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Zhou, D., and Cang, L. 2006a. Influence of vertical electric field on migration of heavy metal complexes in soil column. Chin. J. Environ. Sci. 26, 78–82.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. J., Yuan, T., Zheng, S. S., Ju, B. X., and Wang, W. H. 2006b. Enhancing electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soils with stepwise moving anode method. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A–Environ. Sci. Eng. 41, 2517–2530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., and Kamon, M. 2005. Electrokinetic dewatering and sedimentation of dredged contaminated sediment. Eng. Geol. 77, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, V., Robotin, B., and Ilea, P. 2013. Nickel recovery/removal from industrial wastes: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 73, 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brouwere, K., Buekers, J., Cornelis, C., Schlekat, C. E., and Oller, A. R. 2012. Assessment of indirect human exposure to environmental sources of nickel: Oral exposure and risk characterization for systemic effects. Sci. Total Environ. 419, 25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denkhaus, E., and Salnikow, K. 2002. Nickel essentiality, toxicity and carcinogenity. Crit. Rev. Onc./Hematol. 42, 35–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eykholt, G. R., and Daniel, D. E. 1994. Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soils. J. Geotech. Engrg. ASCE 120, 797–815.
   Google Scholar
• Giannis, A., Pentari, D., Wang, J. Y., and Gidarakos, E. 2010. Application of sequential extraction analysis to electrokinetic remediation of cadmium, nickel and zinc from contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 184, 547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannis, A., Tay, E., Kao, J., and Wang, J. Y. 2012. Impact of vertical electrokinetic flushing technology to remove heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. Electrochim. Acta. 86, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannis, G., Muntoni, A., Polettini, A., and Pomi, R. 2009. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hahladakis, J. N., Lekkas, N., Samponias, A., and Gidarakos, E. 2014. Sequential application of chelating agents and innovative surfactants for the enhanced electroremediation of real sediments from toxic metals and PAHs. Chemosphere. 105, 44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. K., and Rojo, A. 2007. Testing pulsed electric fields in electroremediation of copper mine tailings. Electrochimica Acta. 52, 3399–3405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. V., Sheridan, P. W., Athmer, C. J., Heitkamp, M. A., Brackin, J. M., Weber, D., and Brodsky, P. H. 1995. Integrated in situ soil remediation technology: The Lasagna process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 2528–2534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. V., Athmer, C., Sheridan, P. W., Hughes, B. M., Orth, R., McKenzie, D., Brodsky, P. H., Shapiro, A., Thornton, R., Salvo, J., Schultz, D., Landis, R., Griffith, R., and Shoemaker, S. 1999. The Lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation. 1. Small field test. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1086–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO Method. 2001. Determination of particle size distribution by gravitational liquid sedimentation methods: Part 2: Fixed pipette method. 13317–2:2001Iyer, R. 2001. Electrokinetic Remediation. Particul. Sci. Technol. 19, 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, R. 2001. Electrokinetic remediation. Particul. Sci. Technol. 19, 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, C. K. 2004. Metal fractionation study on bed sediments of River Yamuna, India. Wat. Res. 38, 569–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabata-Pendias, A., and Mukherjee, A. B. 2007. Trace Elements from Soil to Human, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G. N., Yang, B.-I., Choi, W. K., and Lee, K. W. 2009. Development of vertical electrokinetic-flushing decontamination technology to remove 60Co and 137Cs from a Korean nuclear facility site. Sep. Purif. Technol. 68, 222–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. W., Wang, F. Y., Huang, Z. H., and Wang, H. 2010. Simultaneous removal of 2,4- dichlorophenol and Cd from soils by electrokinetic remediation combined with activated bamboo charcoal. J. Hazard. Mater. 176, 715–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. P. 1995. Nickel. In: Heavy Metals in Soils, Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette RS, br. 50/2012. 2012. Regulation on limit values for pollutants in surface and ground waters and sediments, and the deadlines for their achievement (in Serbian).
   Google Scholar
• Ottosen, L. M. 1995. Electrokinetic Remediation: Application to Soils Polluted from Wood Preservation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geology and Geotechnical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosen, L. M., Christensen, I. V., Pedersen, A. J., and Villumsen, A. 2005. Electrodialityc remediation of heavy metal polluted soil. In: Environmental Chemistry, Green Chemistry and Pollutants in Ecosystems, pp. 223–233 (E. Lichtfouse, J. Schwartzbauer, and D. Robert, eds.), Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Pazos, M., Sanroman, M. A., and Cameselle, C. 2006. Improvement in electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal spiked kaolin with the polarity exchange technique. Chemosphere. 62, 817–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radtke, D. B., Wilde, F. D., Davis, J. V., and Popowski, T. J. 2006. National Field Manual for the Collection of Water-Quality Data (TWRI Book 9), Alkalinity and Acid Neutralizing Capacity. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/Chapter6/section6.6/pdf/6.6.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rajić, L., Dalmacija, B., Ugarčina Perović, S., and Bokorov, M. 2012. Electrokinetic treatment of Cu contaminated kaolin: Using an Fe/Cu galvanic cell. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7, 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajić, L., Dalmacija, B., Ugarčina Perović, S., Pešić, V., Dalmacija, M., Klašnja, M., Bečelić Tomin, M., and Watson, M. 2013. Improving the electrokinetic remediation of nickel-, cadmium-, and lead-contaminated sediment. Soil Sediment Contam. 22(2), 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R., and Cameselle, C. 2009. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R., Cameselle, C., and Ala, P. 2010. Integrated electrokinetic-soil flushing to remove mixed organic and metal contaminants. J. Appl. Electrochem. 40, 1269–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, M., Shoji, T., and Yoshimura, N. 2007. Research on heavy metal recovery using the electrokinetic phenomenon. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 158, 337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007a. Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, Soils, and Oils, Method 3051A. Available at: http://www.caslab.com/EPAMethods/PDF/EPA-Method-3051A.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007b. Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, Method 7000B, Revision 2. http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/7000b.pdf (accessed March 17, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. Y., Huang, X. J., Kao, C. M., and Stabnikova, O. 2006. Removal of heavy metals from kaolin using an upward electrokinetic soil remedial (UESR) technology. J. Hazard. Mater. 136, 532–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. Y., Huang, X. Y., Kao, J. C. M., and Stabnikova, O. 2007. Simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals from Kaolin using an upgraded electrokinetic soil remediation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 144, 292–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. Y., Zhou, D. M., Cang, L., Li, L. Z., and Wang, P. 2009. Solid/solution Cu fractionations/speciation of a Cu contaminated soil after pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation and their relationships with soil microbial and enzyme activities. Environ. Pollut. 157, 2203–2208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. S., Kwon, W. J., Choi, J., Baek, K., and O'Loughlin, E. J. 2014. The transport behavior of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn during electrokinetic remediation of a contaminated soil using electrolyte conditioning. Chemosphere. 117, 79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., Wu, C., Wan, J., and Lu, X. 2008. Electromigration of cadmium in contaminated soils driven by single and multiple primary cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 151, 594–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., Wu, C., Wan, J., and Lu, X. 2009. In situ removal of copper from sediments by a galvanic cell. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 421–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., Jina, C., Zhaoa, Z., and Tian, G. 2010. 2D crossed electric field for electrokinetic remediation of chromium contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 177, 1126–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar