Ionic exchange desorption of mercury from contaminated dredging sludge (at 393K and ambient temperature)

References

• Agency, U. S. E. P. 1993. Mercury and Arsenic Wastes: Removal, Recovery, Treatment, and Disposal,  Park Ridge, N.J, USA, Noyes Data Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, D. A. 2010. Recent Developments in Mercury Science, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhoft, R. A. 2012. Mercury toxicity and treatment: A review of the literature. J. Environ. Public Health. 2012, 460508. doi:10.1155/2012/460508
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busto, Y., Tack, M. G. F., Peralta, L. M., Cabrera, X. and Arteaga-Perez, L. E. 2013. An investigation on the modelling of kinetics of thermal decomposition of hazardous mercury wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 260, 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, T. W. 1993. Mercury - major issues in environmental-health. Environ. Health Persp. 100, 31–38. doi:10.1289/ehp.9310031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. A., Chen, -S.-S. and Reznik, C. 1993a. Volatilizing toxic metals from soil. Waste Manage. 13, 467–479. doi:10.1016/0956-053X(93)90078-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. A., Yang, M. and Nedwed, T. 1993b. Feasibility of extracting toxic metals from soil using anhydrous ammonia. Waste Manage. 13, 207–219. doi:10.1016/0956-053X(93)90045-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi, C., Lesa, B., Aneggi, E., Dolcetti, G. and Goi, D. 2011. Salt-assisted thermal desorption of mercury from contaminated dredging sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 193, 177–182. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covelli, S., Acquavita, A., Piani, R., Predonzani, S. and De Vittor, C. 2009. Recent contamination of mercury in an estuarine environment (Marano lagoon, Northern Adriatic, Italy). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 82, 273–284. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebinghaus, R., Turner, R. R., de Lacerda, L. D., Vasiliev, O. and Salomons, W. 1999. Mercury Contaminated Sites: Characterization, Risk Assessment and Remediation, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Godarzi Nik, M., Shahbazi, B. and Grigoryan, K. 2012. The study of mercury pollution distribution around a chlor-alkali petrochemical complex, Bandar Imam, southern Iran. Environ. Earth Sci. 67, 1485–1492. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1592-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblum, D. K., Rak, A., Ponnapalli, M. D. and Clayton, C. J. 2006. The Fort Totten mercury pollution risk assessment: A case history. J. Hazard. Mater. 136, 406–417. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Tang, J., Gai, L., Gong, Y., Guan, H., He, R. and Lyu, H. 2017. Different approaches for preparing a novel thiol-functionalized graphene oxide/Fe-Mn and its application for aqueous methylmercury removal. Chem. Eng. J. 319, 229–239. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylander, L. D. and Goodsite, M. E. 2006. Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 368, 352–370. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, G. B., Shi, J. B. and Feng, X. B. 2006. Mercury pollution in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 3672–3678. doi:10.1021/es062707c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. H., Wang, Y. J. and Chern, J. M. 2005. Extraction kinetics of heavy metal-containing sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 123, 112–119. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. R., Eom, Y. and Lee, T. G. 2017. Mercury recovery from mercury-containing wastes using a vacuum thermal desorption system. Waste Manage. 60, 546–551. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesa, B., Aneggi, E., Rossi, G., Comuzzi, C. and Goi, D. 2009. Bench-scale tests on ultrasound-assisted acid washing and thermal desorption of mercury from dredging sludge and other solid matrices. J. Hazard. Mater. 171, 647–653. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, F. A., Alguacil, F. J., Rodriguez, O., Sierra, M. J. and Millan, R. 2015. Mercury leaching from hazardous industrial wastes stabilized by sulfur polymer encapsulation. Waste Manag. 35, 301–306. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, F. J., Peng, C. S., Hou, D. Y., Wu, B., Zhang, Q., Li, F. S. and Gu, Q. B. 2015. Citric acid facilitated thermal treatment: An innovative method for the remediation of mercury contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 300, 546–552. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malarbi, D., Falciglia, P. P. and Vagliasindi, F. G. A. 2015. Removal of Hg from real polluted sediments using enhanced-EK decontamination: Verification of experimental methods and batch-test preliminary results. J. Chem. 270451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, Y., Cheng, L., Ma, B. and Cai, Y. 2016. The fate of mercury in municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: Significance and implications for environmental cycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 306, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, S. 2014. Toxic Effects of Mercury, US, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nakanishi, H., Ukita, M., Sekine, M. and Murakami, S. 1989. Mercury pollution in Tokuyama Bay. Hydrobiologia. 176, 197–211. doi:10.1007/BF00026555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, J. D., Biswas, P. and Giammar, D. E. 2007. Evaluation of a sequential extraction process used for determining mercury binding mechanisms to coal combustion by products. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 57, 856–867. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.7.856
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivero-Verbel, J., Carranza-Lopez, L., Caballero-Gallardo, K., Ripoll-Arboleda, A. and Munoz-Sosa, D. 2016. Human exposure and risk assessment associated with mercury pollution in the Caqueta River, Colombian Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 23, 20761–20771. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7255-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, K. K. S., Thomas, C. C., Sondel, J. A. and Hyche, C. M. 1972. Environ. Res. 5, 172-181, Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrone, N. and Mahaffey, K. R. 2005. Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales, Atmospheric Processes and Human Exposures around the World, US, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, P. and Chattopadhyay, S. 2004. Advances in encapsulation technologies for the management of mercury-contaminated hazardous wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 114, 211–223. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skei, J. M. 1978. Serious mercury contamination of sediments in a Norwegian semi-enclosed bay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 9, 191–193. doi:10.1016/0025-326X(78)90177-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subires-Munoz, J., Garcia-Rubio, A., Vereda-Alonso, C., Gomez -Lahoz, C., Rodriguez-Maroto, J., Garcia-Herruzo, F. and Paz-Garcia, J. 2011. Feasibility study of the use of different agents in the remediation of a mercury contaminated soil from Almaden. Sep. Sci. Technol. 79, 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T., Imura, N. and Clarkson, T. W. 1991. Advances in mercury toxicology - overview. In Suzuki, T; Imura, N; Clarkson, TW, Eds.), Roch S Env.Tox. 1–32. Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Taube, F., Pommer, L., Larsson, T., Shchukarev, A. and Nordin, A. 2008. Soil remediation mercury speciation in soil and vapor phase during thermal treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 193, 155–163. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9679-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thöming, J., Kliem, B. K. and Ottosen, L. M. 2000. Sci. Total environment electrochemically enhanced oxidation reactions in sandy soil pollutants with mercury. Sci. Total Environ. 261, 137–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B. and Borsuk, M. E. 2014. Perceptions of mercury risk and its management. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 20, 1385–1405. doi:10.1080/10807039.2013.858526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich, S. M., Ilyushchenko, M. A., Kamberov, I. M. and Tanton, T. W. 2007. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of a derelict chlor-alkali plant. Part I: Sediment and water contamination of Lake Balkyldak and the River Irtysh. Sci. Total Environ. 381, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Feng, X., Anderson, C. W., Xing, Y. and Shang, L. 2012. Remediation of mercury contaminated sites - A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 221-222, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. X., Feng, X. B., Anderson, C. W. N., Qiu, G. L., Bao, Z. D. and Shang, L. H. 2014. Effect of cropping systems on heavy metal distribution and mercury fractionation in the Wanshan mining district, China: Implications for environmental management. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33, 2147–2155. doi:10.1002/etc.2664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Chen, L., Shi, W. L., Liu, L. Z., Li, Y. and Meng, X. Z. 2015. Mercury distribution in sediment along urban-rural gradient around Shanghai (China): Implication for pollution history. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 22, 1697–1704. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3611-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar