Comparative performance evaluation of anodic materials for electro-kinetic removal of Lead (II) from contaminated clay soil

References

• Abrol, I. P., J. S. P. Yadav, and F. I. Massoud. 1988. Salt-Affected soils and their management. FAO soils bulletin. Vol. 39. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Acar, Y. B., and A. N. Alshawabkeh. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:2638–47. doi:10.1021/es00049a002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcántara, M. T., J. Gómez, M. Pazos, and M. A. Sanromán. 2012. Electrokinetic remediation of lead and phenanthrene polluted soils. Geoderma 173–174:128–33. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshawabkeh, A., A. Yeung, and M. Bricka. 1999. Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction. J. Environ. Eng. 125:27–35. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1999)125:1(27).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshawabkeh, A. N., T. C. Sheahan, and X. Wu. 2004. Coupling of electrochemical and mechanical processes in soils under DC fields. Mech. Mater. Coupled. Chemo-Mechanical Phenom. 36:453–65.
   Google Scholar
• Amrate, S., D. E. Akretche, C. Innocent, and P. Seta. 2005. Removal of Pb from a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction. Sci. Total Environ 349:56–66. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asimakopoulou, F. E., I. F. Gonos, and I. A. Stathopulos. 2012. Methodologies for determination of soil ionization gradient. J. Electrostat. 70:457–61. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2012.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzán, A. E., and A. J. Arvia. 2008. Electrochemical Behavior of Carbon Materials. In Adsorption by Carbons, ed. J. E. Bottani and M. D. Juan, 479–512. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cameselle, C. 2015. Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil. Electrochim. Acta 181:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameselle, C., and K. R. Reddy. 2012. Development and enhancement of electro-osmotic flow for the removal of contaminants from soils. Electrochim. Acta 86:10–22. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-H., C.-D. Dong, and S.-Y. Shen. 2018. The lead contaminated land treated by the circulation-enhanced electrokinetics and phytoremediation in field scale. J. Hazard. Mater. 368:894–898.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-H., Z. Qiang, and C.-P. Huang. 2006. Remediation and stimulation of selected chlorinated organic solvents in unsaturated soil by a specific enhanced electrokinetics. Colloids Surf., A 287:86–93. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., C. Ding, X. Wang, Z. Wu, Y. Sun, S. Yu, T. Hayat, and X. Wang. 2016. Competitive sorption of As (V) and Cr (VI) on carbonaceous nanofibers. Chem. Eng. J. 293:311–18. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., S. Maruthamuthu, H.-G. Lee, T.-H. Ha, and J.-H. Bae. 2009. Electrochemical studies on the performance of SS316L electrode in electrokinetics. Met. Mater. Int. 15:771–81. doi:10.1007/s12540-009-0771-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. I., and B. H. Kang. 1999. Lead removal from contaminated marine clay by electrokinetic soil decontamination. Eng. Geol. 53:139–50. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00027-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essa, M. H., N. D. Mu,’azu, S. Lukman, and A. Bukhari. 2013. Integrated electrokinetics-adsorption remediation of saline-sodic soils: effects of voltage gradient and contaminant concentration on soil electrical conductivity. Sci. World J. 6:2013.
   Google Scholar
• Essa, M. H., N. D. Mu’azu, S. Lukman, and A. Bukhari. 2015. Application of box-behnken design to hybrid electrokinetic-adsorption removal of mercury from contaminated saline-sodic clay soil. Soil Sediment Contam 24:30–48. doi:10.1080/15320383.2014.911720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fansheng, M., L. Lingli, W. Juling, and W. Yeyao (2013). Effect of pH control at the cathode for the electrokinetic remediation efficiency. In 2013 Third International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA), 646–50. Hong Kong, China: IEEE, 16–18 Jan. doi: 10.1177/1753193412475247
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, L. S. G., A. Neto, M. G. C. D. Silva, and M. G. A. Vieira. 2013. Removal of cadmium (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous phase on sodic bentonite. Mater. Res. 16:515–27. doi:10.1590/S1516-14392013005000007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, J., M. T. Alcántara, M. Pazos, and M. A. Sanromán. 2009. A two-stage process using electrokinetic remediation and electrochemical degradation for treating benzo[a]pyrene spiked kaolin. Chemosphere 74:1516–21. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., D. Zhao, and Q. Wang. 2018. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: Technical progress over the last decade. Water Res. 147:440–60. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, J., Y. Acar, and R. Gale. 1991. Pb(II) Removal from Kaolinite by Electrokinetics. Int. J. Geotech. Eng 117:241–71. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:2(241).
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. V., C. J. Athmer, P. W. Sheridan, and A. P. Shapiro. 1997. Scale-up aspects of the Lasagna(TM) process for in situ soil decontamination. J. Hazard. Mater. 55:39–60. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00016-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. N., A. T. Yeung, and R. M. Menon. 2011. Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation. Environmentalist 31:33–38. doi:10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T., L. Liu, L. Zhou, and K. Yang. 2018. Operating optimization for the heavy metal removal from the municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes in the three-dimensional electrokinetics. Chemosphere 204:294–302. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, C.-H., C. Yuan, and K.-C. Chen. 2010. Effect of processing fluid and initial concentration on electrokinetic removal of environmental hormone—Nonylphenol (NP) from soil matrix. J. Appl. Electrochem. 40:1123–30. doi:10.1007/s10800-010-0081-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. J., and M. James. 1992. Charge reversal of kaolinite by hydrolyzable metal ions: An electroacoustic study. Clays Clay Miner 40:644–49. doi:10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F. I., T. Husain, and R. Hejazi. 2004. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J. Environ. Manage. 71:95–122. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A., and M. A. Khan. 1995. Adsorption of chromium (III), chromium (VI) and silver (I) on bentonite. Waste Manage. 15:271–82. doi:10.1016/0956-053X(95)00025-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W.-S., G.-Y. Park, D.-H. Kim, H.-B. Jung, S.-H. Ko, and K. Baek. 2012. In situ field scale electrokinetic remediation of multi-metals contaminated paddy soil: Influence of electrode configuration. Electrochim. Acta 86:89–95. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., J.-H. Choi, H.-G. Lee, T.-H. Ha, and J.-H. Bae. 2012. Effect of electrode materials on electrokinetic reduction of soil salinity. Sep. Sci. Technol. 47:22–29. doi:10.1080/01496395.2011.607205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., W. Li, W. Song, and M. Guo. 2018. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci. Total Environ 633:206–19. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukman, S., A. Bukhari, M. H. Al-Malack, N. D. Mu’azu, and M. H. Essa. 2014. Geochemical modeling of trivalent chromium migration in saline-sodic soil during lasagna process: Impact on soil physicochemical properties. Sci. World J. 2014:20.
   Google Scholar
• Lukman, S., M. Essa, N. D. Mu’azu, A. Bukhari, and C. Basheer. 2013a. Adsorption and desorption of heavy metals onto natural clay material: Influence of initial pH. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6:1. doi:10.3923/jest.2013.1.15.
   Google Scholar
• Lukman, S., M. H. Essa, N. D. Mu’azu, and A. Bukhari. 2013b. Coupled electrokinetics-adsorption technique for simultaneous removal of heavy metals and organics from saline-sodic soil. Sci. World J. (2013b:9.
   Google Scholar
• Lukman, S., N. D. Mu’azu, M. H. Essa, and A. Usman. 2015. Optimal removal of cadmium from heavily contaminated saline–sodic soil using integrated electrokinetic-adsorption technique. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 40:1289–97. doi:10.1007/s13369-015-1605-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. W., F. Y. Wang, Z. H. Huang, and H. Wang. 2010. Simultaneous removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol and Cd from soils by electrokinetic remediation combined with activated bamboo charcoal. J. Hazard. Mater. 176:715–20. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, S. Q., M. Bhanger, and M. Khuhawar. 2005. Preconcentration and separation of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) using sawdust as a sorbent. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 383:619–24. doi:10.1007/s00216-005-3391-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, E., M. Pérez, O. Romero, E. D. Beltrán, S. Castro, J. L. Corona, A. Corona, M. C. Cuevas, and E. Bustos. 2012. Effects of electrode material on the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal by an electrokinetic remediation process. Electrochim. Acta 86:148–56. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 2005. “Fundamentals of soil behavior,”. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mu’azu, N. D. 2018. Evaluation of the influence of clay montmorillonite content on the aqueous uptake of lead and zinc. Water Environ. Res 90:771–82. doi:10.2175/106143017X15131012153202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu’azu, N. D., A. Usman, N. Jarrah, and O. Alagha. 2016b. Pulsed electrokinetic removal of chromium, mercury and cadmium from contaminated mixed clay soils. Soil Sediment Contam 25:757–75. doi:10.1080/15320383.2016.1213700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu’azu, N. D., M. H. Essa, and S. Lukman. 2016a. Scale-up of hybrid electrokinetic–Adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from contaminated saline-sodic clay soil. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. J. 31(2):122–30
   Google Scholar
• Mu’azu, N. D., M. H. Essa, and S. Lukman. 2017. Response surface modeling of rate of replenishing processing fluids during hybrid electrokinetics-adsorption treatment of saline-sodic soil. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 42:1117–27. doi:10.1007/s13369-016-2310-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu’azu, N. D., and N. Jarrah. 2017. Influence of bentonite proportion in natural clay on Pb2+ ions sorption: response surface methodology, kinetics and equilibrium studies. Soil Sediment Contam 26:691–708. doi:10.1080/15320383.2017.1405909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musić, S., N. Filipović-Vinceković, and L. Sekovanić. 2011. Precipitation of amorphous SiO2 particles and their properties. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 28:89–94. doi:10.1590/S0104-66322011000100011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., and D. C. Montgomery. 1995. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 1Ed. John Wiley& Sons Inc: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Y.-S., B. Sen Gupta, and M. A. Hashim. 2015. Effects of operating parameters on the performance of washing–Electrokinetic two stage process as soil remediation method for lead removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 156:403–13. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastefanakis, N., N. Papastefanakis, D. Mantzavinos, and A. Katsaounis. 2010. DSA electrochemical treatment of olive mill wastewater on Ti/RuO2 anode. J. Appl. Electrochem. 40:729–37. doi:10.1007/s10800-009-0050-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R. 2011. Special issue on contaminant mixtures: Fate, transport, and remediation. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste 15(3):128–29. American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R., U. S. Parupudi, S. N. Devulapalli, and C. Y. Xu. 1997. Effects of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 55:135–58. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00020-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee, M., G. Asadollahfardi, C. Gomez-Lahoz, M. Villen-Guzman, and J. M. Paz-Garcia. 2019. Modeling of electrokinetic remediation of Cd- and Pb-contaminated kaolinite. J. Hazard. Mater. 366:630–35. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, A. B., J. M. Rodriguez-Maroto, E. P. Mateus, and H. Gomes. 2005. Removal of organic contaminants from soils by an electrokinetic process: The case of atrazine.: Experimental and modeling. Chemosphere 59:1229–39. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saichek, R. E., and K. R. Reddy. 2003. Effect of pH control at the anode for the electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil. Chemosphere 51:273–87. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00849-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T., M. Niinae, T. Koga, T. Akita, M. Ohta, and T. Choso. 2014. EDDS-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated clay soils under neutral pH conditions. Colloids Surf., A 440:145–50. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S EPA. 1996. Method 3050B - Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils. Revision 2, 1–12. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. K. 2017. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem. Eng. J. 308:438–62. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2007. Method 7000B - Flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C, USA: USEPA. p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vane, L. M., and G. M. Zang. 1997. Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electro-osmotic permeability: Implications for electro-kinetic soil remediation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 55:1–22. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00010-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez, M. V., D. A. Vasco, F. Hernández-Luis, D. Grandoso, M. Lemus, D. M. Benjumea, and C. D. Arbelo. 2009. Electrokinetic study of the buffer capacity of some soils from Tenerife.: Comparison with a volumetric technique. Geoderma 148:261–66. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkutyte, J., M. Sillanpää, and P. Latostenmaa. 2002. Electrokinetic soil remediation – Critical overview. Sci. Total Environ. 289:97–121. doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01027-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-Y., X.-J. Huang, J. C. M. Kao, and O. Stabnikova. 2007. Simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals from kaolin using an upward electrokinetic soil remediation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 144:292–99. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. 2006. Fundamental aspects of prolonged electrokinetic flows in kaolinites. Geomech. Geoeng. 1:13–25. doi:10.1080/17486020500528026.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, A. T., and -Y.-Y. Gu. 2011. A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 195:11–29. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, C., C.-H. Hung, and K.-C. Chen. 2009. Electrokinetic remediation of arsenate spiked soil assisted by CNT-Co barrier—The effect of barrier position and processing fluid. J. Hazard. Mater. 171:563–70. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, C., and C.-H. Weng. 2001. Remediation of Cr (III) contaminated clay by electrokinetic: The effect of processing fluids. J.Chin. Environ. Eng. 11:179–86.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Y. Zeng, and Z. Cheng. 2016. Removal of heavy metal ions using chitosan and modified chitosan: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 214:175–91. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., G. Chu, P. Dong, J. Xiao, Q. Meng, M. Baumgartel, B. Xu, and T. Hao. 2018. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead- and cadmium-contaminated paddy soil by composite electrolyte of sodium chloride and citric acid. J. Soils Sediments 18:1915–24. doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1890-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, W., M. A. Iqbal, and M. K. Butt. 2017. Pb2+ ions mobility perturbation by iron particles during electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 169:257–61. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar