Impact of nanomaterials accumulation on the organic carbon associated enzymatic activities in soil

References

• https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/nanometals-market
   Google Scholar
• https://inkwoodresearch.com/reports/nanomaterials-market/
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., and P. K. Pal. 2020. Agriculture nanotechnology: Translating research outcome to field applications by influencing environmental sustainability. NanoImpact 19:100232. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2020.100232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adetunji, A. T., F. B. Lewu, R. Mulidzi, and B. Ncube. 2017. The biological activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators: A review. J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 17:794–807. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162017000300018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, B., A. Rizvi, K. Ali, J. Lee, A. Zaidi, M.S. Khan and J. Musarrat, et al. 2021. Nanoparticles in the soil–plant system: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19:1–65. doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01129-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajwa, H. A., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1994. Decomposition of different organic materials in soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 18 (3):175–82. doi:10.1007/BF00647664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadishad, B., S. Chahal, A. Akbari, V. Cianciarelli, M. Azodi, S. Ghoshal, N. Tufenkji, et al. 2018. Amendment of agricultural soil with metal nanoparticles: Effects on soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (4):1908–18. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, M. K., A. K. Pandey, P. S. Bundela, and J. Khan. 2015. Co-Composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste mixed with different bulking waste: Characterization of physicochemical parameters and microbial enzymatic dynamic. Bioresour. Technol. 182:200–07. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awet, T., Y. Kohl, F. Meier, S. Straskraba, A.-L. Grün, T. Ruf, C. Jost, R. Drexel, E. Tunc, C. Emmerling, et al. 2018. Effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on the microbiota and functional diversity of enzymes in soil. Environ. Sci. Eur. 30:1–10. doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0140-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Moshe, T., S. Frenk, I. Dror, D. Minz, and B. Berkowitz . 2013. Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil properties. Chemosphere 90 (2):640–46. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, P. C., Y. Chen, L. Chen, G. Qiu, Y. Luo, and J. Xu . 2017. Is the rate of mineralization of soil organic carbon under microbiological control? Soil Biol. Biochem. 112:127–39. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., and M. C. Chang. 2014. Exploring bacterial lignin degradation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 19:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.11.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni, A., F. G. Serra, V. Gallo, A. Deregibus, and T. Castroflorio. 2021. The 50 most-cited articles on clear aligner treatment: A bibliometric and visualized analysis. Am. J. Orthodont. Dentofacial Orthoped. 159 (4):e343–e362. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. J., M. N. Weintraub, C. R. Hewins, and S. Kalisz. 2011. Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43 (4):795–803. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. J., K. S. Pregitzer, J. N. Crawford, G. P. Zogg, and D. R. Zak. 2004. Simulated chronic NO 3 − deposition reduces soil respiration in northern hardwood forests. Glob. Change. Biol. 10:1080–91. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. A. 2005. Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: A review. Pedobiologia 49:637–44. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choinowski, T., W. Blodig, K. H. Winterhalter, and K. Piontek. 1999. The crystal structure of lignin peroxidase at 1.70 Å resolution reveals a hydroxy group on the Cβ of tryptophan 171: A novel radical site formed during the redox cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 286 (3):809–27. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., Y. Son, T. K. Yoon, S. Kim, and W. Kim . 2011. The effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on soil microbial activity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 74:569–75. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, R. T., M. G. Ryan, G. I. Ågren, H. E. Birge, E. A. Davidson, P. E. Eliasson, S. E. Evans, S. D. Frey, C. P. Giardina, F. M. Hopkins, et al. 2011. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates–synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Glob. Change. Biol. 17:3392–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Coelho-Moreira, J., G. M. Maciel, R. Castoldi, S. da Silva Mariano, F. D. Inácio, A. Bracht, and R. M. Peralta. 2013. Involvement of lignin-modifying enzymes in the degradation of herbicides. Herbicides-Advances in Research 165.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, R., A. Kelkar, D. Baraniya, A. Molaei, A. Moulick, R. S. Meena, and P. Formanek. 2017. Enzymatic degradation of lignin in soil: A review. Sustainability 9 (7):1163. doi:10.3390/su9071163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, R., and E. Kandeler. 2005. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment 448–456. 978-0-12-348530-4. doi:10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00146-6
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Y. Zhang, L. Liu, M. Qv, Y. Lv, Y. Yin, Y. Zhou, M. Cui, Y. Zhu, H. Zhang, et al. 2017. Can visible light impact litter decomposition under pollution of ZnO nanoparticles? Chemosphere 187:368–75. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, S. D., M. Knorr, J. L. Parrent, and R. T. Simpson. 2004. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 196:159–71. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gałązka, A., and K. Furtak. 2019. Functional microbial diversity in context to agriculture. In Microbial diversity in the genomic era, 347–58, 978-0-12-814849-5. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2017-0-01759-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ganaie, S. A., and J. A. Wani. 2021. Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Nanotechnology Research Field. Collnet 15 (2):445–67.
   Google Scholar
• Garcıa-Gil, J. C., C. Plaza, P. Soler-Rovira, and A. Polo. 2000. Long-Term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32 (13):1907–13. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00165-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisseler, D., and W. R. Horwath. 2008. Regulation of extracellular protease activity in soil in response to different sources and concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 40:3040–48. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, F., T. Sonderer, R. W. Scholz, and B. Nowack. 2009. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:9216–22. doi:10.1021/es9015553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, F., T. Sun, and B. Nowack. 2013. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: Review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ. Pollut. 181:287–300. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S., S. K. Dhull, and K. K. Kapoor. 2005. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (14):1584–91. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänsch, M., and C. Emmerling. 2010. Effects of silver nanoparticles on the microbiota and enzyme activity in soil. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 173:554–58. doi:10.1002/jpln.200900358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. F., O. F. H. Hansen, and M. B. Nielsen. 2020. Advances and challenges towards consumerization of nanomaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15:964–65. doi:10.1038/s41565-020-00819-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, F., H. Wang, Q. Chen, B. Yang, Y. Gao, and L. Wang . 2015. Short-term response of soil enzyme activity and soil respiration to repeated carbon nanotubes exposure. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 24:250–61. doi:10.1080/15320383.2015.948611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igalavithana, A. D., S. S. Lee, N. K. Niazi, Y.-H. Lee, K. Kim, J.-H. Park, D. Moon, and Y. S. Ok . 2017. Assessment of soil health in urban agriculture: Soil enzymes and microbial properties. Sustainability 9:310. doi:10.3390/su9020310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvan, M., L. Edesi, A. Adamson, and T. Võsa. 2014. Soil microbial communities and dehydrogenase activity depending on farming systems. Plant. Soil Environ. 60:459–63. doi:10.17221/410/2014-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed, Z., K. Dashora, M. Mishra, V. D. Fasake, and A. Srivastva . 2019. Effect of accumulation of nanoparticles in soil health—A concern on future. Front. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 5:1–9. doi:10.15761/FNN.1000181.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., H. Wang, and B. Yang . 2020. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on microbial biomass and enzyme activity in soils containing cellulose and lignin. 2020 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2020), 194, 2020. E3S Web of Conferences. 05028. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202019405028.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczyńska, G., A. Borowik, and J. Wyszkowska. 2015. Soil dehydrogenases as an indicator of contamination of the environment with petroleum products. Water Air Soil Pollut. 226:1–11. doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2642-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, A. A., A. S. Adeleye, J. R. Conway, K. L. Garner, L. Zhao, G. N. Cherr, J. Hong, J. L. Gardea-Torresdey, H. A. Godwin, S. Hanna, et al. 2017. Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials. NanoImpact 7:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner, H., M. Vandenbol, and P. Wang. 2010. Fungi unearthed: Transcripts encoding lignocellulolytic and chitinolytic enzymes in forest soil. PloS One 5:e10971. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, K., S. K. Kohli, N. Handa, H. Kaur, P. Ohri, R. Bhardwaj, P. Ahmad, J. Rinklebe, and P. Ahmad. 2021. Enthralling the impact of engineered nanoparticles on soil microbiome: A concentric approach towards environmental risks and cogitation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 222:112459. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., J. Kim, and I. Lee. 2011. Effects of Zn and ZnO nanoparticles and Zn2+ on soil enzyme activity and bioaccumulation of Zn in Cucumis sativus. Chem. Ecol. 27:49–55. doi:10.1080/02757540.2010.529074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, J. I., S.-J. Yoon, and Y.-J. An. 2016. Long-term effects of ZnO nanoparticles on exoenzyme activities in planted soils. Environ. Eng. Res. 22:224–29. doi:10.4491/eer.2016.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebedev, S. V., I. A. Gavrish, L. V. Galaktionova, A. M. Korotkova, and E. A. Sizova . 2019. Assessment of the toxicity of silicon nanooxide in relation to various components of the agroecosystem under the conditions of the model experiment. Environ. Geochem. Health 41:769–82. doi:10.1007/s10653-018-0171-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., E. Sahle-Demessie, A. A. Hassan, J. G. Pressman, G. A. Sorial, and C. Han . 2017. The transport and deposition of CeO2 nanoparticles in the presence of natural organic matter extracted from the Ohio river. Sci. Total Environ. 609:1616. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang, C., J. P. Schimel, and J. D. Jastrow. 2017. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat. Microbiol. 2:1–6. doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malakar, A., S. R. Kanel, C. Ray, D. D. Snow, and M. N. Nadagouda . 2021. Nanomaterials in the environment, human exposure pathway, and health effects: A review. Sci. Total. Environ. 759:143470. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrahi, A., A. R. VandeVoort, and Y. Arai. 2014. Effects of silver nanoparticle on soil-nitrification processes. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 66:504–13. doi:10.1007/s00244-013-9994-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, M., I. Mendes, and M. Loureiro. 2003. Microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soils under native vegetation and annual and perennial cropping systems in the region of Primavera do Leste (MT). Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 27:425–33. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832003000300004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, C., S. Storey, N. Clipson, and E. Doyle. 2017. Soil microbial community responses to contamination with silver, aluminium oxide and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 26:449–58. doi:10.1007/s10646-017-1776-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, M., K. Dashora, A. Srivastava, V. D. Fasake, and R. H. Nag . 2019. Prospects, challenges and need for regulation of nanotechnology with special reference to India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 171:677–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini, C., F. Fornasier, and T. Sinicco. 2004. Enzymatic activity as a parameter for the characterization of the composting process. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36 (10):1587–94. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, P. R., Almeida-Vara, E., Malcata, F. X., Duarte, J. C. 2007. Lignin transformation by a versatile peroxidase from a novel Bjerkandera sp. strain. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 59 (3):234–38. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nannipieri, P., E. Kandeler, and P. Ruggiero. 2002. Enzyme activities and Microbiological and Biochemical Processes in Soil. Enzymes Environ. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ndiaye, E., J. Sandeno, D. McGrath, and R. Dick. 2000. Integrative biological indicators for detecting change in soil quality. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 15:26–36. doi:10.1017/S0889189300008432.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., S. Linder, R. Giesler, and P. Högberg. 2005. Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration. Glob. Change. Biol. 11:1745–53. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001033.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival, H. J., R. L. Parfitt, and N. A. Scott. 2000. Factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand grasslands is clay content important? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:1623–30. doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6451623x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, J., and T. W. Jeffries. 1990. Mineralization of 14C-ring-labeled synthetic lignin correlates with the production of lignin peroxidase, not of manganese peroxidase or laccase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 (6):1806–12. doi:10.1128/aem.56.6.1806-1812.1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowska, A., and J. Koper. 2010. Soil beta-glucosidase activity under winter wheat cultivated in crop rotation systems depleting and enriching the soil in organic matter. J. Elem. 15:593–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, R., A. Bhattacharyya, and Q. D. Nguyen. 2017. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: Recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 8:1014. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, M. I., T. Shahzad, M. Shahid, M. Imran, J. Dhavamani, I. M. I. Ismail, J. M. Basahi, and T. Almeelbi . 2017. Toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles to grass litter decomposition in a sandy soil. Sci. Rep. 7:1–11. doi:10.1038/srep41965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarajeewa, A., J. Velicogna, D. Schwertfeger, J. I. Princz, R. M. Subasinghe, R. P. Scroggins, and L. A. Beaudette . 2020. Ecotoxicological effects of copper oxide nanoparticles (nCuO) on the soil microbial community in a biosolids-amended soil. Sci. Total. Environ. 763:143037. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y.-J., J. I. Kwak, and Y.-J. An. 2012. Evidence for the inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles on the activities of soil exoenzymes. Chemosphere 88:524–29. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonin, M., J. M. Martins, X. Le Roux, G. Uzu, A. Calas, and A. Richaume . 2017. Toxicity of TiO 2 nanoparticles on soil nitrification at environmentally relevant concentrations: Lack of classical dose–response relationships. Nanotoxicology 11:247–55. doi:10.1080/17435390.2017.1290845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, H., A. Sharma, S. K. Bhardwaj, S. K. Arya, N. Bhardwaj, and M. Khatri . 2021. Recent advances in the applications of nano-agrochemicals for sustainable agricultural development. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 23:213–39. doi:10.1039/D0EM00404A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemmer, M., M. H. Gerzabek, and E. Kandeler. 1998. Organic matter and enzyme activity in particle-size fractions of soils obtained after low-energy sonication. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31 (1):9–17. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00083-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, W., F. Dou, C. Li, X. Ma, and L. Q. Ma . 2021. Impacts of metallic nanoparticles and transformed products on soil health. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51:973–1002. doi:10.1080/10643389.2020.1740546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebian, S., T. Rodrigues, J. Das Neves, B. Sarmento, R. Langer, and J. Conde. 2021. Facts and figures on materials science and nanotechnology progress and investment. ACS Nano 15 (10):15940–52. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c03992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., B. Xie, J. Wang, W. He, X. Wang, and G. Wei. 2014. County-scale spatial distribution of soil enzyme activities and enzyme activity indices in agricultural land: Implications for soil quality assessment. Sci. World J. 2014:1–11. doi:10.1155/2014/535768.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y. J., J. M. Ashcroft, D. Chen, G. Min, C.-H. Kim, B. Murkhejee, C. Larabell, J. D. Keasling, and F. F. Chen . 2007. Charge-associated effects of fullerene derivatives on microbial structural integrity and central metabolism. Nano. Lett. 7:754–60. doi:10.1021/nl063020t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, R., and P. J. Teunissen. 2001. Oxidative mechanisms involved in lignin degradation by white-rot fungi. Chem. Rev. 101 (11):3397–414. doi:10.1021/cr000115l.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H., C. Lu, J. Yang, K. Banger, D. N. Huntzinger, C. R. Schwalm, A. M. Michalak, R. Cook, P. Ciais, D. Hayes, et al. 2015. Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29:775–92. doi:10.1002/2014GB005021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolaymat, T., A. El Badawy, A. Genaidy, W. Abdelraheem, and R. Sequeira . 2017. Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions. J. Clean Prod. 143:401–12. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torn, M. S., S. E. Trumbore, O. A. Chadwick, P. M. Vitousek, and D. M. Hendricks . 1997. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389:170–73. doi:10.1038/38260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushio, M., R. Wagai, T. C. Balser, and K. Kitayama. 2008. Variations in the soil microbial community composition of a tropical montane forest ecosystem: Does tree species matter? Soil Biol. Biochem. 40:2699–702. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utobo, E. B., and L. Tewari. 2015. Soil enzymes as bioindicators of soil ecosystem status. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 13 (1):147–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-García, M. C., F. Suárez-Estrella, M. J. López, and J. Moreno. 2010. Microbial population dynamics and enzyme activities in composting processes with different starting materials. Waste Management 30 (5):771–78. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A. 2021. A bibliometric analysis and visualisation of research trends in nano cellulose and its used in medical engineering. Ann. Roman. Soc. Cell Biol. 25 1 3658–64.
   Google Scholar
• Villar, I., D. Alves, J. Garrido, and S. Mato. 2016. Evolution of microbial dynamics during the maturation phase of the composting of different types of waste. Waste Management 54:83–92. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, S., and D. Parkinson. 1992. Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 7:33–37. doi:10.1017/S0889189300004434.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. P., D. R. Zak, and R. L. Sinsabaugh. 2004. Microbial community response to nitrogen deposition in northern forest ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36:1443–51. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., J. Fan, and Y. Xing . 2019. The effects of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil environment of crop plants. Adv. Agron. 153:121–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C. Y., C. Du, J. S. Jian, L. Hou, Z. K. Wang, Q. Wang, Z. C. Geng, J. Vencovský, J. H. W. Distler, and L. Šenolt. 2021. The interplay of labile organic carbon, enzyme activities and microbial communities of two forest soils across seasons. Sci. Rep. 11 (1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., C. Peng, L. Sun, S. Zhang, H. Huang, Y. Chen, and J. Shi . 2015. Distinctive effects of TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles on soil microbes and their community structures in flooded paddy soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 86:24–33. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, T., D. Liu, J. Chen, Z. Yang, R. Dou, X. Gao, and L. Wang . 2018. Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities in two different soil types. J. Soils Sediments 18:211–21. doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1716-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Y. Li, Z. Zhang, Z. Gu, H. Zhong, Q. Zha, E. Chen, C. Zhu, and E. Chen. 2020. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Ann. Transl. Med. 8 (13):816–816. doi:10.21037/atm-20-4235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., L. Chen, Z. Wu, and C. Sun. 2011. Kinetic parameters of soil β-glucosidase response to environmental temperature and moisture regimes. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo. 35:1285–91. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832011000400022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar