Stubble Burning Effect On Soil’s Dielectric Behavior: An Exploration Of Machine Learning-Based Modelling Approaches

References

• Abdurrahman, M. I., S. Chaki, and G. Saini. 2020. Stubble burning: Effects on health & environment, regulations and management practices. Adv. Environ 2:100011. doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100011.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1998. Official methods of analysis, Vol. 52, 16th ed., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Arunrat, N., S. Sereenonchai, P. Kongsurakan, C. B. Iwai, M. Yuttitham, and R. Hatano. 2023. Post-fire recovery of soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen, soil nutrients, and soil erodibility in rotational shifting cultivation in Northern Thailand. Front. Environ. Sci 11:1117427. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1117427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunrat, N., S. Sereenonchai, C. Sansupa, P. Kongsurakan, and R. Hatano. 2023. Effect of rice straw and stubble burning on soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in central Thailand. Biology 12 (4):501. doi:10.3390/biology12040501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajracharya, S. B., A. Mishra, A. Maharjan, and P. Pardha-Saradhi. 2021. Determinants of crop residue burning practice in the Terai region of Nepal. PLoS One 16 (7):e0253939. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behari, J. 2005. Dielectric behavior of soil, 22–40. Netherland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuvaneshwari, S., H. Hettiarachchi, and J. N. Meegoda. 2019. Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. 16 (5):832. doi:10.3390/ijerph16050832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, G. R. 1965. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical properties. Including Stat. Meas. Sampling 9:374–90.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 2017. Classification and regression trees. Routledge dict. doi:10.1201/9781315139470.
   Google Scholar
• Brungard, C. W., J. L. Boettinger, M. C. Duniway, S. A. Wills, and T. C. Edwards Jr. 2015. Machine learning for predicting soil classes in three semi-arid landscapes. Geoderma 239:68–83. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., J. P. V. Santos, R. T. Torres, F. Santarém, and C. Fonseca. 2018. Tree-based methods: Concepts, uses and limitations under the framework of resource selection models. J. Environ. Inform 32 (2). doi:10.3808/jei.201600352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 2018. Impact of practice of stubble burning in environment. A socio legal study, Vol. 437147, 1–9. Munich: GRIN Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, B. S., G. Mahajan, V. Sardana, J. Timsina, and M. L. Jat. 2012. Productivity and sustainability of the rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: Problems, opportunities, and strategies. Adv. Agron. 117:315–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C., and V. Vapnik. 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn 20 (3):273–97. doi:10.1007/BF00994018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, W. T., A. A. Berg, M. H. Cosh, A. Loew, B. P. Mohanty, R. Panciera, J. P. Walker, D. Ryu, and J. P. Walker. 2012. Upscaling sparse ground‐based soil moisture observations for the validation of coarse‐resolution satellite soil moisture products. Rev. Geophys. 50 (2). doi:10.1029/2011RG000372.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. O., C. A. Weiss Jr, and J. B. Everett. 1995. Effect of soil composition on complex dielectric properties. USA: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg Ms Environmental Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Dauerman, L., G. Windgasse, Y. He, and Y. Lu (1992, August). Microwave treatment of hazardous wastes: Feasibility studies. APMC, Adelaide, SA, Australia, (Vol. 1, pp. 155–57). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• DeCoste, D., and B. Schölkopf. 2002. Training invariant support vector machines mach. Learn 46 (1):161–90. doi:10.1023/A:1012454411458.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, W. J., and J. M. Moreau. 2008. Open-ended coaxial probe. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 (9):1984–91. doi:10.1109/TIM.2008.917683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. B., G. W. Hergert, C. A. Shapiro, and C. S. Wortmann. 2007. Guidelines for soil sampling. In NebGuide G1740. USA: UNL, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gangwar, K. S., K. K. Singh, S. K. Sharma, and O. K. Tomar. 2006. Alternative tillage and crop residue management in wheat after rice in sandy loam soils of Indo-Gangetic plains. Soil Tillage Res. 88 (1–2):242–52. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman, S. J., and D. M. Blei. 2012. A tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models. J. Math. Psychol. 56 (1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granged, A. J., L. M. Zavala, A. Jordán, and G. Bárcenas-Moreno. 2011. Post-fire evolution of soil properties and vegetation cover in a Mediterranean heathland after experimental burning: A 3-year study. Geoderma 164 (1–2):85–94. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, I., and W. B. Voorhees. 2020. Soil compaction. In Methods for assessment of soil degradation, 167–79. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., K. Mao, T. Xu, J. Guo, Z. Zuo, and C. Gao. 2018. A soil moisture estimation framework based on the CART algorithm and its application in China. J. Hydrol. 563:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänsch, R., T. Jagdhuber, and B. Fersch. 2020. Soil-permittivity estimation under grassland using machine-learning and polarimetric decomposition techniques. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 59 (4):2877–87. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2020.3010104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, P. R., and P. R. Hesse. 1971. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Y., L. Zhao, Y. H. Dong, and Q. Zhang. 2011. Remediation of soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls by microwave-irradiated manganese dioxide. J. Hazard. Mater. 186 (1):128–32. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivezić, V., D. Kraljević, Z. Lončarić, M. Engler, D. Kerovec, V. Zebec, and J. Jović 2016, February. Organic matter determined by loss on ignition and potassium dichromate method. In 51st Croatian and 11th International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija, Croatia (Vol. 36, p. 40).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 2005. Soil chemical analysis: Advanced course. Madison, WI: UW-Madison Libraries parallel press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, N., A. Bhatia, and H. Pathak. 2014. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India, Aerosol air qual. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14 (1):422–30. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I., and T. M. Mitchell. 2015. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Sci 349 (6245):255–60. doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury, W. A., and R. Horton. 2004. Soil phy. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kaatze, U. 1989. Complex permittivity of water as a function of frequency and temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data 34 (4):371–74. doi:10.1021/je00058a001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanabkaew, T., and N. T. Kim Oanh. 2011. Development of spatial and temporal emission inventory for crop residue field burning. Environ. Model. Assess. 16 (5):453–64. doi:10.1007/s10666-010-9244-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, M., D. P. Malik, G. S. Malhi, V. Sardana, N. S. Bolan, R. Lal, and K. H. Siddique. 2022. Rice residue management in the Indo-Gangetic Plains for climate and food security. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42 (5):1–25. doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00817-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Oanh, N. T., D. A. Permadi, N. P. Dong, and D. A. Nguyet. 2018. Emission of toxic air pollutants and greenhouse gases from crop residue open burning in Southeast Asia. In Land-atmospheric research applications in South and Southeast Asia, 47–66. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67474-2_3.
   Google Scholar
• Kulpa, K. S., P. Samczyński, M. Malanowski, A. Gromek, D. Gromek, W. Gwarek, G. Tański, and G. Tanski. 2014. An advanced SAR simulator of three-dimensional structures combining geometrical optics and full-wave electromagnetic methods. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 52 (1):776–84. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2283267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., X. Liu, and K. Liao. 2017. Soil moisture retrieval using UWB echoes via fuzzy logic and machine learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 5 (5):3344–52. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2017.2760338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S., Z. A. Manan, S. R. W. Alwi, and H. Hashim. 2012. A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev 16 (5):3084–94. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., and T. Begho. 2022. Crop residue burning in South Asia: A review of the scale, effect, and solutions with a focus on reducing reactive nitrogen losses. J. Environ. Manage. 314:115104. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. W. G., T. C. Chang, C. H. Chen, M. Z. Wang, and H. W. Hsu. 2014. Bioaugmentation efficiency investigation on soil organic matters and microbial community shift of diesel-contaminated soils. Inter. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 95:276–84. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., A. Xu, and B. Long. 2011. Energy from combustion of rice straw: Status and challenges to China. Energy Power Eng. 3 (3):325. doi:10.4236/epe.2011.33040.
   Google Scholar
• Mahesh, B. 2020. Machine learning algorithms-a review. IJSR 9:381–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., B. Minasny, B. P. Malone, and A. B. Mcbratney. 2019. Pedology and digital soil mapping (DSM). Eur. J. Soil Sci 70 (2):216–35. doi:10.1111/ejss.12790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. S. 2017. Cropping pattern in Punjab (1966-67 to 2014-15). Econ. Polit. Wkly 52 (3):30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Maulud, D., and A. M. Abdulazeez. 2020. A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends 1 (4):140–47. doi:10.38094/jastt1457.
   Google Scholar
• McBratney, A., J. de Gruijter, and A. Bryce. 2019. Pedometrics timeline. Geoderma 338:568–75. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. K. 1989. Pozzolanic and cementitious by-products in concrete–another look. Spec. Publ. 114:1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Migo, M. V. P. (2019). Optimization and life cycle assessment of the direct combustion of rice straw using a small scale, stationary grate furnace for heat generation. Unpublished Masters thesis. UPLB.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. N., and J. A. Sonquist. 1963. Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58 (302):415–34. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Policy for Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR). 2014. Department of agriculture and cooperation, department of agriculture and cooperation, ministry of agriculture. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz, A., M. Farooq, F. Nadeem, K. H. Siddique, and R. Lal. 2019. Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: Issues, options and opportunities. Crop Pasture Sci. 70 (5):395–427. doi:10.1071/CP18383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolz, R., and G. Kammerer. 2017. Evaluating a sensor setup with respect to near-surface soil water monitoring and determination of in-situ water retention functions. J. Hydrol. 549:301–12. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padarian, J., B. Minasny, and A. B. McBratney. 2020. Machine learning and soil sciences: A review aided by machine learning tools. Soil 6 (1):35–52. doi:10.5194/soil-6-35-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palta, P., P. Kaur, and K. S. Mann. 2022. Dielectric behavior of soil as a function of frequency, temperature, moisture content and soil texture: A deep neural networks based regression model. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 56 (3):145–67. doi:10.1080/08327823.2022.2103630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankaj, P., P. K. Prachi Palta, and K. S. Mann. 2020. Performance of high temperature open-ended coaxial probe for dielectric properties of high loss food materials in frequency range 10-200 MHz. Solid State Technol. 63 (2s).
   Google Scholar
• Pankhurst, C., C. Kirkby, B. Hawke, and B. Harch. 2002. Impact of a change in tillage and crop residue management practice on soil chemical and microbiological properties in a cereal-producing red duplex soil in NSW, Australia. Biol. Fert. Soils 35 (3):189–96. doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0459-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansu, M., and J. Gautheyrou. 2006. pH measurement, 551–79. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, G., C. E. Graves, S. Serebryakov, R. Mao, X. Sheng, M. Foltin, J. P. Strachan, and J. P. Strachan. 2021. Tree-based machine learning performed in-memory with memristive analog CAM. Nat. Commun. 12 (1):1–10. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25873-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porichha, G. K., Y. Hu, K. T. V. Rao, and C. C. Xu. 2021. Crop residue management in India: Stubble burning vs. other utilizations including bioenergy. Energies 14 (14):4281. doi:10.3390/en14144281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, S., A. Singh, N. E. Korres, D. Rathore, S. Sevda, and D. Pant. 2020. Sustainable utilization of crop residues for energy generation: A life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 303:122964. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregitzer, K. S., M. J. Laskowski, A. J. Burton, V. C. Lessard, and D. R. Zak. 1998. Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth. Tree Physiol. 18 (10):665–70. doi:10.1093/treephys/18.10.665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, M. S., and L. E. Grant. 2007. Temperature effects on soil dielectric properties measured at 50 MHz. Vadose Zone J. 6 (4):759–65. doi:10.2136/vzj2006.0188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. S., R. Chandra, A. K. Tangri, R. Kumar, I. M. Bahuguna, S. U. Latief, P. Pandey, and S. N. Ali. 2018. Crop residues management in sustainability. Clim. Change 4 (1):1–8. doi:10.3233/JCC-180001.
   Google Scholar
• Somasundaram, J., R. S. Chaudhary, D. Awanish Kumar, A. K. Biswas, N. K. Sinha, M. Mohanty, and S. K. Chaudhari, P. Jha, M. Sankar, A. K. Patra. 2018. Effect of contrasting tillage and cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and aggregate‐associated carbon in rainfed Vertisols. Eur. J. Soil Sci 69 (5):879–91. doi:10.1111/ejss.12692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuchly, M. A., and S. S. Stuchly. 1980. Coaxial line reflection methods for measuring dielectric properties of biological substances at radio and microwave frequencies-A review. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 29 (3):176–83. doi:10.1109/TIM.1980.4314902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipayarom, D., and N. K. Oanh. 2007. Effects from open rice straw burning emission on air quality in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Sci 33 (3):339–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V., and O. Chapelle. 2000. Bounds on error expectation for support vector machines. Neural Comput. 12 (9):2013–36. doi:10.1162/089976600300015042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatramanan, V., S. Shah, A. K. Rai, and R. Prasad. 2021. Nexus between crop residue burning, bioeconomy and sustainable development goals over North-Western India. Front. Energy Res. 8:614212. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.614212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst, N., F. Kienle, K. D. Sayre, J. Deckers, D. Raes, A. Limon-Ortega, and L. Tijerina-Chavez, B. Govaerts. 2011. Soil quality as affected by tillage-residue management in a wheat-maize irrigated bed planting system. Plant Soil. 340 (1–2):453–66. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0618-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, S. 2005. Applied linear regression. Vol. 528. JWS. doi:10.1002/0471704091
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. K. 1998. Prediction with Gaussian processes: From linear regression to linear prediction and beyond. In Learning in graphical models, 599–621. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_23.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., A. Weerasinghe, Q. Sun, F. Fan, and K. Y. See. 2021. Improved calibration technique for two-probe setup to enhance its in-circuit impedance measurement accuracy. Measurement 185:110007. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zribi, M., N. Baghdadi, and M. Nolin. 2011. Remote sensing of soil. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2011:1–2. doi:10.1155/2011/904561.
   Google Scholar