Visualization of Global Research Output on Disruptive Innovation in Health Care

References

• Li W, Chai Y, Khan F, Jan SRU, Verma S, Menon VG, Li X & Li X. A comprehensive survey on machine learning-based big data analytics for IoT-enabled smart healthcare system. Mob Netw Appl. 2021;26:234–52. DOI:10.1007/s11036-020-01700-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sounderajah V, Patel V, Varatharajan L, Harling L, Normahani P, Symons J, Barlow J, Darzi A & Ashrafian H. Are disruptive innov recognised in the healthcare literature? A systematic review. BMJ Innovations. 2021;7(1):208–16. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sensmeier JE. Disruptive innovation and the changing face of healthcare. J Nurs Manag. 2012;43(11):13–14. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000421681.71712.86.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen CM. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Swisher-McClure S, Hahn SM & Bekelman J. Proton beam therapy: the next disruptive innovation in healthcare? Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1075):241–43. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooker K, Baldwin D & Chalasani S. RFID technology as sustaining or disruptive innovation: applications in the healthcare industry. Eur J Sci Res. 2009;37(1):160–78. http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Shang T, Miao X & Abdul W. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of disruptive innovation. Int J Innov Sci. 2019;11(2):208–26. doi:10.1108/ijis-05-2018-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J & Christensen CM. Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: a framework for business-model innovation. Health Aff. 2008;27(5):1329–35. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellowlees P, Odor A, Patrice K, Parish MB, Nafiz N, Iosif AM & Hilty D. Disruptive innovation: the future of healthcare? Telemed E-Health. 2011;17(3):231–34. doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenstra D & Erkoyuncu JA. Using visualization for disruptive innovation in healthcare. Intell Syst Ref Libr. 2014;111–42. 10.1007/978-3-642-54816-1_7.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Waldeck A & Fogg R. How disruptive innovation can finally revolutionize healthcare. A plan for incumbents and start-ups to build a future of better health and lower costs. Innosight. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? J Doc. 1969;25:348–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadus RN. Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics. 1987;12:373–79. DOI:10.1007/BF02016680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AK, Singh M, Singh K, Patel AK, Varma AK & Kuri R. Visualizing publication trends in webology journal: a bibliometric review based on the scopus database (2006-2020). Libr Philos Pract (E-Journal). 2021;5995:1–24. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5995.
   Google Scholar
• Si S & Chen H. A literature review of disruptive innovation: what it is, how it works and where it goes. J Eng Technol Manag. 2020;56:101568. DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo V & Magnusson M. A bibliometric map of intellectual communities in frugal innovation literature. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2020;1–14. 10.1109/tem.2020.2994043.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto CT & Spers RG. A systematic review of the debate and the researchers of disruptive innovation. J Technol Manag Innov. 2019;14(1):73–82. doi:10.4067/s0718-27242019000100073.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Porter AL & Suominen A. Insights into relationships between disruptive technology/innovation and emerging technology: a bibliometric perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;129:285–96. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Salvador M, Rio-Belver RM & Garechana-Anacabe G. Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: the case of 3D bioprinting. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0180375. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G & Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1(1):377–86. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00019.
   Google Scholar
• Patel AK, Singh M, Patel AK & Singh K. Mapping of global research trends in financial literacy: a scientometric approach. Libr Philos Pract (E-Journal). 2021;5141:1–19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5141.
   Google Scholar
• Scopus. Welcome to Scopus; n.d. [accessed 2022 Jan 10]. https://www.scopus.com/
   Google Scholar
• Fabregat-Aibar L, Barberà-Mariné MG, Terceño A & Pié L. A bibliometric and visualization analysis of socially responsible funds. Sustainability. 2019;11(9):2526. doi:10.3390/su11092526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca BdePFe,Sampaio RB, Fonseca MVdeA & Zicker F. Co-Authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1). doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson J. Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. J Econ Perspect. 1996;10(3):153–58. doi:10.1257/jep.10.3.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acedo FJ, Barroso C, Casanueva C & Galan JL. Co-Authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. J Manag Stud. 2006;43(5):957–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat DS, Singh K, Singh M, Patel AK & Patel AK. Research productivity of wadia institute of himalayan geology. Libr Philos Pract (E-Journal). 2021; 5804:1–22. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5804.
   Google Scholar
• SJR. Scimago Journal & Country Rank [internet]; n.d. [accessed 2022 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/
   Google Scholar
• Small H. Co-Citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1973;24(4):265–69. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao CH & Yang C. The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int J Inf Manage. 2011;31(2):128–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AK, Singh K, Singh M & Patel AK. Publication trends in financial inclusion: a scientometric assessment and visualization. Libr Philos Pract (E-Journal). 2021; 5115:1–20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5115.
   Google Scholar
• Singh I, Singh P, Rawat P, Patel AK, Singh M, Singh K & Patel AK. 2021. Research productivity of forest research institute, dehradun during 1990-2019: a scientometric approach. Indian for. 147(8):767–77. doi:10.36808/if/2021/v147i8/164678
   Google Scholar