Discriminating and monitoring rangeland condition classes with MODIS NDVI and EVI indices in Iranian arid and semi-arid lands

References

• Bashari, H., and A. A. Shahmoradi. 2004. Autecology of three range plants species: Artemisia sieberi, Stipa hohenackeriana, and Ferula gumosa in Qom province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research 11(3): 287–307.
   Google Scholar
• Bastin, G. N., R. W. Tynan, and V. H. Chewings. 1998. Implementing satellite-based grazing gradient methods for rangeland assessment in South Australia. Rangeland Journal 20(1): 61–76. doi:10.1071/rj9980061
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. T., and P. T. Tueller. 2003. Rangeland monitoring using remote sensing. Arid Land Research and Management 17(4): 455–67. doi:10.1080/713936105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caccamo, G., L. A. Chisholm, R. A. Bradstock, and M. L. Puotinen. 2011. Assessing the sensitivity of MODIS to monitor drought in high biomass ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment 115(10): 2626–39. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R., and K. Green. 1998. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Daubenmire, R. 1984. Viewpoint: Ecological site/range site/habitat type. Rangelands 6: 263–64.
   Google Scholar
• DPIF. 2004. Stocktake, balancing supply and demand: A monitoring package that “takes stock” of your grazing resources and points to improved management decisions. Report QE04001. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1949. Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2: 104–15. doi:10.2307/3893680
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., F. Hüsler, H. Liniger, and E. Hodel. 2015. Trend analysis of MODIS NDVI time series for detecting land degradation and regeneration in Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments 113: 16–28. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, H. D. 1984. A plant frequency method for determining range condition (inventory, evaluation). PhD thesis, The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Friedel, M. H., and K. Shaw. 1987. Evaluation of methods for monitoring sparse patterned vegetation in arid rangeland, I. Herbage. Journal of Environmental Management 25: 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRW. 2005. Land cover map of Iran. Final report, the Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Management Organization, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., A. R. Huete, and K. Didan. 2003. Multisensor comparisons and validation of MODIS vegetation indices at the semiarid Jornada experimental range. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41(10): 2368–81. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2003.813840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., A. R. Huete, W. Ni, and T. Miura. 2000. Optical-biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination. Remote Sensing of Environment 74: 609–20. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00150-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadian, F., R. Jafari, and H. Bashari. 2013. Assessing the accuracy of spectral indices in vegetation cover mapping at vegetation type and across vegetation type scales using TM sensor data in southern Zagroos regions. Iranian Remote Sensing and GIS 4(4): 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Huete, A., K. Didan, T. Miura, E. P. Rodriguez, X. Gao, and L. G. Ferreira. 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 83: 195–213. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huete, A. R., C. O. Justice, and W. J. D. Van Leeuwen. 1999. MODIS Vegetation Index (MOD 13). Version 3. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/land_atbd.html
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R. R. 1949. Field comments on the range condition method of forage survey. Journal of Range Management 2: 1–10. doi:10.2307/3893827
   Google Scholar
• IRIMO. 2013. Islamic republic of Iran meteorological organization (IRIMO). Isfahan, Iran: Climate Data, CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, C. O., E. Vermote, J. R. G. Townshend, R. DeFries, D. P. Roy, D. K. Hall, V. V. Salomonson, et al. 1998. The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS): Land remote sensing for global change research. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36(4): 1228–49. doi:10.1109/36.701075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karfs, R. A., B. N. Abbott, P. F. Scarth, and J. F. Wallace. 2009. Land condition monitoring information for reef catchments: A new era. Rangeland Journal 31: 69–86. doi:10.1071/rj08060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauth, J. R., and G. S. Thomas. 1976. The tasselled cap-A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crop as seen by Landsat. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Symposium Machine Processing of Remotely-sensed Data, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 21 June–1 July.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, R. A., H. Yeganeh, and S. J. Khajedin. 2012. Comparison of WiFS and MODIS sensors for preparing vegetation covers maps in Semirom rangeland. Journal of Applied RS & GIS Techniques in Natural Resource Sciences 3(2): 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, T. M., S. E. Marsh, A. F. van Rooyen, K. Kellner, and B. J. Orr. 2015. Assessing rangeland condition in the Kalahari Duneveld through local ecological knowledge of livestock farmers and remotely sensed data. Journal of Arid Environments 113: 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawley, V., M. Lewis, K. Clarke, and B. Ostendorf. 2016. Site-based and remote sensing methods for monitoring indicators of vegetation condition: An Australian review. Ecological Indicators 60: 1273–83. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J. A., G. N. Bastin, J. F. Wallace, and T. R. McVicar. 2007. Assessing landscape health by scaling with remote sensing: When is it not enough? Landscape Ecology 22: 163–69. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. H., and H. X. Zietsnian. 1996. Assessing and monitoring rangeland condition in extensive pastoral regions using satellite remote sensing and GIS techniques: An application to the Ceres Karoo region of South Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 13(3):100–12. doi:10.1080/10220119.1996.9647906
   Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A., H. Bashari, M. Bassiri, and M. Saeedfar. 2013. Analysis of six rangeland condition methods in semi-steppe range land of central Zagroos. Journal of Rangeland 7(4): 344–55.
   Google Scholar
• Moazzenzadeh, R., S. Arshad, B. Ghahraman, and K. Davari. 2012. Drought monitoring in unirrigated lands based on the remote sensing technique. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management 2: 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, M. R. 1999. Range and range management. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAP. 2005. National action programme to combat desertification and mitigate the effects of drought of Islamic Republic of Iran. Report, The Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Management Organization, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• NASA. 2013. National aeronautics and space administration (NASA), rapid response-LANCE-near real time (orbit swath). [Internet] Accessed July 2013. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. W. 1951. Application of ecology in the determination of range condition and trend. Journal of Range Management 7(1): 14–23. doi:10.2307/3894620
   Google Scholar
• Petus, C., M. Lewis, and D. White. 2013. Monitoring temporal dynamics of Great Artesian Basin wetland vegetation, Australia, using MODIS NDVI. Ecological Indicators 34: 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, J., A. Chehbouni, A. R. Huete, Y. H. Kerr, and S. Sorooshian. 1994. A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment 48(2): 119–26. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reevesa, M. C., and L. S. Baggett. 2014. A remote sensing protocol for identifying rangelands with degraded productive capacity. Ecological Indicators 43: 172–82. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedfar, M., M. Bassiri, M. R. Moghadam, and M. Jafari. 2010. Comparison the ability of range condition methods to classify range condition in steppe and sub-steppe regions. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources 62(4): 487–501.
   Google Scholar
• Safaei, M., M. Tarkesh, M. Bassiri, and H. Bashari. 2013. Determining the potential habitat of Astragalus verus olivier using the geostatistical and logistic regression methods. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal 3(1): 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriar, P., M. Budde, and J. Rowland. 2014. Mapping irrigated areas in Afghanistan over the past decade using MODIS NDVI. Remote Sensing of Environment 149: 155–65. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, L. A., and A. D. Smith. 1955. Range management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart, L. A., A. D. Smith, and T. W. Box. 1975. Range management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thenkabail, P. S., A. D. Ward, J. G. Lyon, and C. J. Maerry. 1994. Thematic mapper vegetation indices for determining soybean and corn growth parameters. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60(4): 437–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8(2): 127–50. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. D. 1989. The development of systems of assessing the condition of rangeland in Australia. In Secondary succession and the evaluation of rangeland condition, ed. W. K. Lauenroth and W. A. Laycock. London, UK: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar