Fault Location Observability Using Phasor Measurement Units in a Power Network Through Deterministic and Stochastic Algorithms

References

• A. G. Phadke, and J. S. Thorp, Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. New York: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• N. M. Manousakis, G. N. Korres, and P. S. Georgilakis, “Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1070–1077, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. S. Yang, Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Willey and Sons, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• B. Xu, and A. Abur, “Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs,” presented at the Proceedings of 2004 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, vol. 2, Oct. 10–13 2004, pp. 943–946.
   Google Scholar
• B. Gou, “Optimal placement of PMUs by integer linear programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1525–1526, 2008. DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dua, S. Dambhare, R. K. Gajbhive, and S. A. Soman, “Optimal multistage scheduling of PMU placement: an ILP approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1812–1820, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.-L. Poirion, S. Toubaline, C. D. Ambrosio, and L. Liberti, “The power edge set problem,” Network Int. J., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 104–120, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. P. Theodorakatos, “Optimal phasor measurement unit placement for numerical observability using a two-phase branch-and-bound algorithm,” Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–25, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Pal, A. K. S. Vullikanti, and S. S. Ravi, “A PMU placement scheme considering realistic costs and modern trends in relaying,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 552–561, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. P. Theodorakatos, N. M. Manousakis, and G. N. Korres, “Optimal PMU placement using nonlinear programming,” presented at the OPT-i—An International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization, Kos Island, Greece, 2014, pp. 240–258.
   Google Scholar
• N. P. Theodorakatos, N. M. Manousakis, and G. N. Korres, “A sequential quadratic programming method for contingency constrained phasor measurement unit placement,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3185–3211, 2015. DOI:10.1002/etep.2027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. P. Theodorakatos, N. M. Manousakis, and G. N. Korres, “Optimal placement of phasor measurement units with linear and non‐linear models,” Electric Power Compon. Syst., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 357–373, 2015. DOI:10.1080/15325008.2014.981319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. N. Korres, N. M. Manousakis, T. C. Xygkis, and J. Lofberg, “Optimal phasor measurement unit placement for numerical observability in the presence of conventional measurement using semi-definite programming,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 2427–2436, 2015. DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. C. Koutsoukis, N. M. Manousakis, P. S. Georgilakis, and G. N. Korres, “Numerical observability method for optimal phasor measurement units placement using recursive Tabu search method,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 347–356, 2013. DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Mishra, K. D. Jones, A. Pal, and V. Centeno, “Binary particle swarm optimisation-based optimal substation coverage algorithm for phasor measurement unit installations in practical systems,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Babu, and B. Bhattacharyya, “Optimal allocation of phasor measurement unit for full observability of the connected power network,” Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 79, pp. 89–97, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Zhu, L. Wu, S. Mousavian, and J. H. Roh, “An optimal joint placement of PMUs and flow measurements for ensuring power system observability under N-2 transmission contingencies,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 96, pp. 254–265, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.08.025.
   Google Scholar
• M. Korkali, and A. Abur, “Placement of PMUs with channel limits,” presented at the Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. General Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, 2009, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• R. F. Nuqui, and A. G. Phadke, “Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability,” IEEE Trans. Power Del, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2381–2388, 2005. DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2005.855457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rakpenthai, S. Premrudeepreechacharn, S. Uatrongjit, and N. R. Watson, “An optimal PMU placement method against measurement loss and branch outage,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. Singh, and S. P. Singh, “Optimal cost wide area measurement system incorporating communication infrastructure,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 2814–2821, 2017. DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Saha, J. Izykowski, and E. Rosolowski, Fault Location on Power Networks. London, UK: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• L. Kai-Ping, L. Chih-Wen, Y. Chi-Shan, and J. Joe-Air, “Transmission network fault location observability with minimal PMU placement,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1128–1136, 2006. DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2005.858806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. Pokharel, and S. Brahma, “Optimal PMU placement for fault location in a power system,” presented at the Proceedings of the 41st North American Power Symposium, Starkville, MI, Oct. 4–6 2009, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• B. Rajasekhar, A. Kumar Chandel, and B. Vedik, “Differential evolution based optimal PMU placement for fault observability of power system,” presented at the Students Conference on Engineering and Systems (SCES), Allahabad, India, Apr. 12–14, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• S. S. Geramian, H. A. Abyane, and K. Mazlumi, “Determination of optimal PMU placement for fault location using genetic algorithm,” Electr. Utility Deregulation Restruct. Power Technol., vol. 30, pp. 134–139, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• T. A. Alexopoulos, N. M. Manousakis, and G. N. Korres, “Fault location observability using phasor measurements units via semidefinite programming,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 5187–5195, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kavasseri, and, and S. K. Srinivasan, “Joint placement of phasor and conventional power flow measurements for fault observability of power systems,” IET Generat. Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1019–1024, 2011. DOI:10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. T. Hendrix, and B. Toth, Introduction to Nonlinear and Global Optimization. New York: Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• K. Deep, K.-P. Singh, M. L. Kansal, and C. Mohan, “A real coded genetic algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems,” App. Math. Comput., vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 505–518, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2009.02.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.-H. Wu, and Lin, C.-Y. “Hybrid-coded crossover for binary-coded genetic algorithms in constrained optimization,” Eng. Optimiz., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 26–46, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Koulinas, K. Lazaros, and K. Anagnostopoulos, “A particle swarm optimization based hyper-heuristic algorithm for the classic resource constrained project scheduling problem,” Inform. Sci., vol. 277, pp. 680–693, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gonen, Modern Power System Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• K. A. Clements, “Observability methods and optimal meter placement,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 1990. DOI:10.1016/0142-0615(90)90004-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. Wolsey, and G. L. Nemhauser, Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. New York: John Willey and Sons, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• S. P. Bradley, A. C. Hanx, and T. L. Magnanti, Applied Mathematical Programming. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• J. W. Chinneck, Feasibility and Infeasibility in Optimization: Algorithms and Computational Methods (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science). New York: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.gurobi.com/resources/.[Online].
   Google Scholar
• J. Nocedal, and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• D. G. Luenberger, and Y. Yingue, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. 3nd edn. New York: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• L. T. Biegler, Nonlinear Programming: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications to Chemical Processes. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• E. Polac, “Optimization: Algorithms and consistent approximations,” Appl. Math. Sci. vol. 124. New York: Springer, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• K. P. Chong, and H. Z. Stanislaw, An Introduction to Optimization. New York: John Willey and Sons, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• T. H. Cormen, and C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein, Introduction to Algorithms. London, UK: The MIT Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB® [Online]. User’s Guide for Mathwork.
   Google Scholar
• Berthold, T. Gamrath, G. Gleixner, Achterberg, and T. “SCIP: Solving constraint integer programs,” Math. Program. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2009. DOI:10.1007/s12532-008-0001-1.
   Google Scholar
• Version 7.1.0.53. [Online]. Available: https://www.mosek.com/MOSEK.
   Google Scholar
• Global Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB®. [Online]. User’s Guide for Mathwork.
   Google Scholar