Performance Analysis of the Dual-Setting Directional Overcurrent Relays-Based Protection Considering the Impact of Curve Types and Fault Location

References

• A. Yazdaninejadi, D. Nazarpour, and S. Golshannavaz, “Dual-setting directional over-current relays: An optimal coordination in multiple source meshed distribution networks,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 86, pp. 163–176, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shih, C. Salazar, and A. Enriquez, “Adaptive directional overcurrent relay coordination using Ant colony optimization,” IET Gen. Transm. Distrib., vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 2040–2049, 2015. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mahari and H. Seyedi, “An analytical approach for optimal coordination of overcurrent relays,” IET Gen. Transm. Distrib., vol. 7, pp. 674–680, 2013. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. S. Gokhale and V. S. Kale, “Exploring the fallacies in the overcurrent relay coordination optimization problem with simple cases,” presented at the DELCON IEEE Conf., New Delhi, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• H. H. Zeineldin, H. M. Sharaf, D. K. Ibrahim, and E. E.-D. A. El-Zahab, “Optimal protection coordination for meshed distribution systems with DG using dual setting directional over-current relays,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 6, pp. 115–123, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2357813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens Global, “Multifunction protection – SIPROTEC 7SJ62j Overcurrent and motor protection Siemens Global.” [Online]. Available: https://new.siemens.com/global/en/products/energy/energy-automationand-smartgrid/protection-relays-and-control/siprotec-4/overcurrentand-motor-protection/multifunction-protectionsiprotec-7sj62.html. Accessed: May 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• A. S. Noghabi, H. R. Mashhadi, and J. Sadeh, “Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays considering different network topologies using interval linear programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1348–1354, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2041560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Damchi, J. Sadeh, and H. R. Mashhadi, “Applying hybrid interval linear programming and genetic algorithm to coordinate distance and directional over-current relays,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 44, no. 17, pp. 1935–1946, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2016.1199068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. T. P. Srinivas and K. S. Swarup, “A hybrid GA — Interval linear programming implementation for microgrid relay coordination considering different fault locations,” presented at the 2017 7th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), Pune, India, 2017, pp. 785–790. DOI: 10.1109/ICPES.2017.8387396.
   Google Scholar
• I. Evkay, S. Ashraf, M. Baysal, U. S. Selamogullari, and O. Hasan, “Single dual setting directional over-current relay based line protection logic for distributed generation integrated power systems,” presented at the 2020 2nd Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), Izmir, Turkey, 2020, pp. 245–250. DOI: 10.1109/GPECOM49333.2020.9247868.
   Google Scholar
• H. M. Sharaf, H. H. Zeineldin, D. K. Ibrahim, and E. L. Essam, “A proposed coordination strategy for meshed distribution systems with DG considering user-defined characteristics of directional inverse time overcurrent relays,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 65, pp. 49–58, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Alkaran, M. R. Vatani, M. J. Sanjari, G. B. Gharehpetian, and M. S. Naderi, “Optimal overcurrent relay coordination in interconnected networks by using fuzzy-based GA method,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, pp. 3091–3101, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2626393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Darabi, M. Bagheri, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Dual feasible direction-finding nonlinear programming combined with metaheuristic approaches for exact overcurrent relay coordination,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 114, pp. 105420, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ezzeddine and R. Kaczmarek, “A novel method for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays considering their available discrete settings and several operation characteristics,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 1475–1481, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. T. P. Srinivas and K. S. Swarup, “A new mixed integer linear programming formulation for protection relay coordination using disjunctive inequalities,” IEEE Power Energy Technol. Syst. J., vol. 6, pp. 104–112, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/JPETS.2019.2907320.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Damchi, M. Dolatabadi, H. R. Mashhadi, and J. Sadeh, “MILP approach for optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays in interconnected power systems,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 158, pp. 267–274, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Kida and L. A. Gallego, “Optimal coordination of overcurrent relays using mixed integer linear programming,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1289–1295, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7459611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easun Reyrolle Ltd. ARGUS2, “Numerical directional overcurrent protection relay.” [Online]. Available: http://www.easunreyrolle.com/product.php. Accessed: May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Yang et al., “A structural transmission cost allocation scheme based on capacity usage identification,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2876–2884, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2464108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Sharaf, H. H. Zeineldin, and E. El-Saadany, “Protection coordination for microgrids with grid-connected and islanded capabilities using communication assisted dual setting directional overcurrent relays,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, pp. 143–151, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2546961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Yazdaninejadi, S. Golshannavaz, D. Nazarpour, S. Teimourzadeh, and F. Aminifar, “Dual-setting directional overcurrent relays for protecting automated distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 15, pp. 730–740, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2821175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. C. Kiliçkiran et al., “Power system protection with digital overcurrent relays: A review of non-standard characteristics,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 164, pp. 89–102, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tiwari, R. K. Singh, and N. K. Choudhary, “Coordination of dual setting overcurrent relays in microgrid with optimally determined relay characteristics for dual operating modes,” Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• A. Yazdaninejadi, D. Nazarpour, and V. Talavat, “Optimal coordination of dual-setting directional over-current relays in multi-source meshed active distribution networks considering transient stability,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 13, pp. 157–170, 2018. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Sorrentino and J. V. Rodríguez, “Effects of the curve type of overcurrent functions and the location of analyzed faults on the optimal coordination of directional overcurrent protections,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 88, pp. 106864, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Chabanloo, H. A. Abyaneh, S. S. H. Kamangar, and F. Razavi, “Optimal combined overcurrent and distance relays coordination incorporating intelligent overcurrent relays characteristic selection,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1381–1391, 2011. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2082574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), “3: Single input energizing quantity measuring relays with dependent or independent time, 60255-3.” IEC Electrical, Geneva, Switzerland, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• M. N. Alam, “Overcurrent protection of AC microgrids using mixed characteristic curves of relays,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 74, pp. 74–88, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Khanbabapour and M. E. H. Golshan, “Synchronous DG planning for simultaneous improvement of technical, overcurrent, and timely anti-islanding protection indices of the network to preserve protection coordination,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 32, pp. 474–483, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2538799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Yang, F. Wen, and G. Ledwich, “Optimal coordination of overcurrent relays in distribution systems with distributed generators based on differential evolution algorithm,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 23, pp. 1–12, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/etep.635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG), “IEEE 30-Bus System - Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG).” [Online]. Available: https://icseg.iti.illinois.edu/ieee-30-bus-system/. Accessed: May 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. A. X. Prabhu, S. Sharma, M. Nataraj, and D. P. Tripathi, “Design of electrical system based on load flow analysis using ETAP for IEC projects,” presented at the 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), New Delhi, India, 2016, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICPES.2016.7584103.
   Google Scholar
• A. Soroudi, “Introduction to programming in GAMS,” in Power System Optimization Modeling in GAMS, 2nd ed., Dublin: Springer, 2017, pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• GAMS Development Corporation, “GAMS - cutting edge modeling.” [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/. Accessed: May 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar