Emperor Penguin Optimization Based MPPT for PV System under Different Irradiation Condition

References

• A. I. M. Ali, M. A. Sayed, and E. E. M. Mohamed, “Modified efficient perturb and observe maximum power point tracking technique for grid-tied PV system,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 99, pp. 192–202, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Yilmaz, A. Kircay, and S. Borekci, “PV system fuzzy logic MPPT method and PI control as a charge controller,” Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., vol. 81, pp. 994–1001, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Srinivasan, S. Devakirubakaran, and B. M. Sundaram, “Mitigation of mismatch losses in solar PV system–Two-step reconfiguration approach,” Sol. Energy, vol. 206, pp. 640–654, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ehsan and Q. Yang, “Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: a review of analytical techniques,” Appl. Energy, vol. 210, pp. 44–59, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Li, B. Feng, G. Li, J. Qi, D. Zhao, and Y. Mu, “Optimal distributed generation planning in active distribution networks considering integration of energy storage,” Appl. Energy, vol. 210, pp. 1073–1081, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Premkumar, C. Kumar, and R. Sowmya, “Mathematical modelling of solar photovoltaic cell/panel/array based on the physical parameters from the manufacturer’s datasheet,” IJRED, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2020. DOI: 10.14710/ijred.9.1.7-22.
   Google Scholar
• T. E. K. Zidane, M. R. B. Adzman, M. F. N. Tajuddin, S. M. Zali, and A. Durusu, “Optimal configuration of photovoltaic power plant using grey wolf optimizer: a comparative analysis considering CdTe and c-Si PV modules,” Sol. Energy, vol. 188, pp. 247–257, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Balaraju and C. Chengaiah, “Mathematical analysis of solar photovoltaic array configurations with partial shaded modules,” Tr. Ren. Energy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 121–143, 2020. DOI: 10.17737/tre.2020.6.2.00115.
   Google Scholar
• O. Babaie and M. N. Esfahany, “Optimization and heat integration of hybrid R–HIDiC–PV process with the series–parallel arrangement of PV modules and recycle streams for TAME production,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 242, p. 116786, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Saiprakash, A. Mohapatra, B. Nayak, and S. R. Ghatak, “Analysis of partial shading effect on energy output of different solar PV array configurations,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 39, pp. 1905–1909, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.307.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. Pendem, S. Mikkili, and P. K. Bonthagorla, “PV distributed-MPP tracking: total-cross-tied configuration of string-integrated-converters to extract the maximum power under various PSCs,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1046–1057, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2919768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Desai and S. Mikkili, “Modelling and analysis of PV configurations (alternate TCT-BL, total cross tied, series, series parallel, bridge linked and honey comb) to extract maximum power under partial shading conditions,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., pp. 1–16, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Alqaisi and Y. Mahmoud, “Comprehensive study of partially shaded PV modules with overlapping diodes,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 172665–172675, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. F. A. Shah, I. A. Khan, and H. A. Khan, “Performance evaluation of two similar 100MW solar PV plants located in environmentally homogeneous conditions,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 161697–161707, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. N. Ngoc et al., “A hierarchical architecture for increasing efficiency of large photovoltaic plants under non-homogeneous solar irradiation,” Sol. Energy, vol. 188, pp. 1306–1319, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. H. Farh, A. M. Eltamaly, and M. S. Al-Saud, “Interleaved boost converter for global maximum power extraction from the photovoltaic system under partial shading,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1232–1238, 2019. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Veerasamy, T. Takeshita, A. Jote, and T. Mekonnen, “Mismatch loss analysis of PV array configurations under partial shading conditions,” 2018 7th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), IEEE, pp. 1162–1183, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566949.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ostadrahimi and Y. Mahmoud, “Novel spline-MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems under uniform irradiance and partial shading conditions,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 524–532, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.3009054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Fatemi, M. S. Shadlu, and A. Talebkhah, “Comparison of three-point P&O and hill climbing methods for maximum power point tracking in PV systems,” 2019 10th International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), IEEE, pp. 764–768, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/PEDSTC.2019.8697273.
   Google Scholar
• R. S. Pal and V. Mukherjee, “Metaheuristic based comparative MPPT methods for photovoltaic technology under partial shading condition,” Energy, vol. 212, p. 118592, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mansoor, A. F. Mirza, and Q. Ling, “Harris hawk optimization-based MPPT control for PV systems under partial shading conditions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 274, p. 122857, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhao et al., “A dynamic particles MPPT method for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 220, p. 113070, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zou, F. Yan, X. Wang, and J. Zhang, “An efficient fuzzy logic control algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking under partial shading condition,” J. Frank. Inst., vol. 357, no. 6, pp. 3135–3149, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Toodeji and S. Aghaei, “Domestic PV system with feedback linearization-based control strategy for module-level MPPT under partial shading condition,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1530–1539, 2021. DOI: 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Pilakkat and S. Kanthalakshmi, “Single phase PV system operating under Partially Shaded Conditions with ABC-PO as MPPT algorithm for grid connected applications,” Energy Rep., vol. 6, pp. 1910–1921, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. I. Nusaif and A. L. Mahmood, “MPPT algorithms (PSO, FA, and MFA) for PV system under partial shading condition, case study: BTS in Algazalia, Baghdad,” Int. J. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 100–110, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• H. Li, D. Yang, W. Su, J. Lü, and X. Yu, “An overall distribution particle swarm optimization MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2829668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. A. Sayed, M. A. Sameh, M. A. Attia, and A. O. Badr, “Enhancement of PV performance by using hybrid TLBO-EO optimization,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 101892, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abbassi et al., “Improved arithmetic optimization algorithm for parameters extraction of photovoltaic solar cell single-diode model,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 10435–10451, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-06605-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Aihua, X. Yihan, and K. Suzuki, “A new MPPT design using ISFLA algorithm and FLC to tune the member functions under different environmental conditions,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1511–1531, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07452-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Hu, H. Norouzi, M. Jiang, S. Dadfar, and T. Kashiwagi, “Novel hybrid modified krill herd algorithm and fuzzy controller based MPPT to optimally tune the member functions for PV system in the three-phase grid-connected mode,” ISA Trans., vol. 129, pp. 214–229, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Alkhalaf, Z. M. Ali, and H. Oikawa, “A novel hybrid gravitational and pattern search algorithm based MPPT controller with ANN and perturb and observe for photovoltaic system,” Soft Comput., vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 7293–7315, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07139-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Chauhan and S. Prakash, “A new emperor penguin optimization-based approach for solar photovoltaic parameter estimation,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 31, no. 7, p. e12917, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Sameh, M. I. Marei, M. A. Badr, and M. A. Attia, “An optimized PV control system based on the Emperor Penguin Optimizer,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 751, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/en14030751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gupta, S. Tripathi, S. Singh, and V. S. Gupta, “MPPT-EPO optimized solar energy harvesting for maximizing the WSN lifetime,” Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 347–357, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12083-022-01405-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Dhiman and V. Kumar, “Emperor penguin optimizer: A bio-inspired algorithm for engineering problems,” Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 159, pp. 20–50, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar