Analysis and Comparison of Weibull Parameters for Wind Energy Potential Using Different Estimation Methods: A Case Study of Isparta Province in Turkey

References

• O. Ellabban, H. Abu-Rub, and F. Blaabjerg, “Renewable energy sources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 39, pp. 748–764, Nov. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mostafaeipour, M. Jadidi, K. Mohammadi, and A. Sedaghat, “An analysis of wind energy potential and economic evaluation, in Zahedan, Iran,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 30, pp. 641–650, Feb. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Pallabazzer, “Parametric analysis of wind siting efficiency,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1329–1352, Nov. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2003.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Rehman et al., “Wind and wind power characteristics of the eastern and southern coastal and northern inland regions, South Africa,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., vol. 29, no. 57, pp. 85842–85854, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14276-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. F. Khahro, K. Tabbassum, A. M. Soomro, L. Dong, and X. Liao, “Evaluation of wind power production prospective and Weibull parameter estimation methods for Babaurband, Sindh Pakistan,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 78, pp. 956–967, Feb. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mohammadi, O. Alavi, A. Mostafaeipour, N. Goudarzi, and M. Jalilvand, “Assessing different parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to compute wind power density,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 108, pp. 322–335, Jan. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Usta, I. Arık, I. Yenilmez, and Y. M. Kantar, “A new estimation approach based on moments for estimating Weibull parameters in wind power applications,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 164, pp. 570–578, May 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kang, K. Ko, and J. Huh, “Comparative study of different methods for estimating Weibull parameters: A case study on Jeju Island, South Korea,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 356, Feb. 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11020356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Guarienti et al., “Performance analysis of numerical methods for determining Weibull distribution parameters applied to wind speed in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., vol. 42, pp. 100854, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kang, A. Khanjari, S. You, and J. Lee, “Comparison of different statistical methods used to estimate Weibull parameters for wind speed contribution in nearby an offshore site, Republic of Korea,” Energy Rep., vol. 7, pp. 7358–7373, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. A. Kaplan, “Comparison of the performance of the methods used to find Weibull parameters at different heights,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 12145–12153, Dec. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-021-05866-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. E. Onay, E. Dokur, and M. Kurban, “Performance comparison of new generation parameter estimation methods for Weibull distribution to compute wind energy density,” Elektron. Elektrotech., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 41–48, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.5755/j02.eie.28919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Yaniktepe, O. Kara, I. Aladağ, and C. Ozturk, “Comparison of eight methods of Weibull distribution for determining the best-fit distribution parameters with wind data measured from the met-mast,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 9576–9590, Sept. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22777-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Pandeya, B. Prajapati, A. Khanal, B. Regmi, and S. R. Shakya, “Estimation of wind energy potential and comparison of six Weibull parameters estimation methods for two potential locations in Nepal,” Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 955–966, Sept. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s40095-021-00444-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Arslan, Y. M. Bulut, and A. Yavuz, “Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 40, pp. 820–825, Dec. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Celeska et al., “Estimation of Weibull parameters from wind measurement data by comparison of statistical methods,” presented at the IEEE EUROCON 2015 – Int. Conf. on Comput. as a Tool (EUROCON), Salamanca, Spain, Sept. 2015. pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/EUROCON.2015.7313684.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Baseer, J. P. Meyer, S. Rehman, and M. M. Alam, “Wind power characteristics of seven data collection sites in Jubail, Saudi Arabia using Weibull parameters,” Renew. Energy, vol. 102, pp. 35–49, Mar. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Chaurasiya, S. Ahmed, and V. Warudkar, “Study of different parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to determine wind power density using ground based Doppler SODAR instrument,” Alex. Eng. J., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2299–2311, Dec. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Patidar, V. Shende, P. Baredar, and A. Soni, “Comparative study of offshore wind energy potential assessment using different Weibull parameters estimation methods,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., vol. 29, no. 30, pp. 46341–46356, Jun. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19109-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. T. Kapen, M. J. Guoajio, and D. Yemele, “Analysis and efficient comparison of ten numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy potential: Application to the city of Bafoussam, Cameroon,” Renew. Energy, vol. 159, pp. 1188–1198, Oct. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. C. Ben, A. E. Akpan, C. C. Mbonu, and C. H. Ufuafounye, “Integrated technical analysis of wind speed data for wind energy potential assessment in parts of southern and central Nigeria,” Clean. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 100049, Jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100049.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. Salah, A. G. Abo-Khalil, and R. P. Praveen, “Wind speed characteristics and energy potential for selected sites in Saudi Arabia,” J. King Saud Univ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 119–128, Feb. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2019.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• L. Bilir, M. Imir, Y. Devrim, and A. Albostan, “Seasonal and yearly wind speed distribution and wind power density analysis based on Weibull distribution function,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 40, no. 44, pp. 15301–15310, Nov. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. R. Alsamamra, S. Salah, J. A. H. Shoqeir, and A. J. Manasra, “A comparative study of five numerical methods for the estimation of Weibull parameters for wind energy evaluation at Eastern Jerusalem, Palestine,” Energy Rep., vol. 8, pp. 4801–4810, Nov. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Teimourian, M. Abubakar, M. Yildiz, and A. Teimourian, “A comparative study on wind energy assessment distribution models: A case study on Weibull distribution,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 5684, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/en15155684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Azad, M. G. Rasul, R. Islam, and I. R. Shishir, “Analysis of wind energy prospect for power generation by three Weibull distribution methods,” Energy Proc., vol. 75, pp. 722–727, Aug. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.499.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. Riaz and B. H. Khan, “Estimation of Weibull parameters and selection of optimal wind turbine for the development of large offshore wind farm,” presented at the 2019 Int. Conf. on Electr., Electron. and Comput. Eng. (UPCON), Aligarh, India, Nov. 2019, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/UPCON47278.2019.8980167.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. R. Murthy and O. P. Rahi, “Estimation of Weibull parameters using graphical method for wind energy applications,” presented at the 2014 Eighteenth Natl. Power Syst. Conf. (NPSC), Guwahati, India, Dec. 2014, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/NPSC.2014.7103858.
   Google Scholar
• Y. A. Kaplan, “Rayleigh ve Weibull dağılımları kullanılarak Osmaniye bölgesinde rüzgar enerjisinin değerlendirilmesi,” Suleyman Demirel Univ. J. Natural Appl. Sci., vol. 20, pp. 62–71, 2016. DOI: 10.19113/sdufbed.63806.
   Google Scholar
• E. Dokur, M. Kurban, and S. Ceyhan, “A novel Information Geometry method for estimating parameters of Weibull speed distribution,” Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 39–49, Jan. 2018. DOI: 10.3176/proc.2018.1.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. C. Carneiro, S. P. Melo, P. C. M. Carvalho, and A. P. S. Braga, “Particle swarm optimization method for estimation of Weibull parameters: A case study for the Brazilian northeast region,” Renew. Energy, vol. 86, pp. 751–759, Feb. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Gul, N. Tai, W. Huang, M. H. Nadeem, and M. Yu, “Evaluation of wind energy potential using an optimum approach based on maximum distance metric,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1999, Mar. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/su12051999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wadi and W. Elmasry, “Statistical analysis of wind energy potential using different estimation methods for Weibull parameters: A case study,” Electr. Eng., vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 2573–2594, Dec. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00202-021-01254-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wan et al., “Assessment of wind energy resources in the urat area using optimized Weibull distribution,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., vol. 47, pp. 101351, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Manta ray foraging optimization: An effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 87, pp. 103300, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. I. Selem, H. M. Hasanien, and A. A. El-Fergany, “Parameters extraction of PEMFC’s model using manta rays foraging optimizer,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 4629–4640, Feb. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/er.5244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D. Abdulkareem and S. R. Mohammed, “Comparison between two new censored regression models extended from Burr-XII system with application,” Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 13, pp. 3395–3403, 2022. DOI: 10.22075/ijnaa.2022.6100.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lipirodjanapong, C. Suwanasri, T. Suwanasri, and W. Wangdee, “Empirical circuit breaker failure rate assessment and modelling in a preventive maintenance application,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 1832–1842, Aug. 2015. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2015.1057780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Govardhan and R. Roy, “Comparative analysis of economic viability with distributed energy resources on unit commitment,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 1588–1607, Aug. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2016.1174907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Akdağ and A. Dinler, “A new method to estimate Weibull parameters for wind energy applications,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1761–1766, Jul. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zhao, M. S. Nazir, H. M. J. Nazir, and A. N. Abdalla, “A review on proliferation of artificial intelligence in wind energy forecasting and instrumentation management,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 29, pp. 43690–43709, Jun. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19902-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar