Using Deep Learning for Energy Modeling in Intelligent Structures with Decentralized Power Generation

References

• D. A. Konneh et al., “A multi-criteria decision maker for grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems selection using multi-objective particle swarm optimization,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1188, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11041188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Shivam, J. Tzou, and S. Wu, “Multi-objective sizing optimization of a grid-connected solar–wind hybrid system using climate classification: A case study of four locations in southern Taiwan,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2505, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/en13102505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. B. Pandya and H. R. Jariwala, “A different perception of hybrid renewable energy sources integrated multi-objective optimal power FLOW considering performance parameters and penetration,” Smart Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 186–215, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/23080477.2021.1916853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Mansouri Kouhestani et al., “Multi-criteria PSO-based optimal design of grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems,” Int. J. Green Energy, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 617–631, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2020.1779072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Donado, L. Navarro, M. Quintero, and M. Pardo, “HYRES: A multi-objective optimization tool for proper configuration of renewable hybrid energy systems,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en13010026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Alaaeddin, A. Zakaria, J. M. Jani, and N. Seyajah, “Optimization techniques and multi-objective analysis in hybrid solar-wind power systems for grid-connected supply,” presented at the IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., Chengdu, China, vol. 538, no. 1, pp. 012040, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/538/1/012040.
   Google Scholar
• N. Pramodini, M. RajanSingaravel, and N. Niveditha, “Multi objective optimization of PV/wind hybrid renewable energy system for a zero net energy campus,” presented at the 2022 3rd Int. Conf. Emerg. Technol. (INCET), Belgaum, India, 2022, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/INCET54531.2022.9824135.
   Google Scholar
• A. Elgammal and T. Ramlal, “Optimal model predictive frequency control management of grid integration PV/wind/FC/storage battery based smart grid using multi objective particle swarm optimization MOPSO,” WSEAS Trans. Electron., vol. 12, pp. 46–54, 2021. DOI: 10.37394/232017.2021.12.7.
   Google Scholar
• A. Elgammal and T. Ramlal, “Optimal frequency control management of grid integration PV/wind/FC/storage battery based smart grid using multi objective particle swarm optimization MOPSO and model predictive control (MPC),” EJENG., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 50–56, 2021. DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.5.2507v.
   Google Scholar
• D. G. Rosero, N. L. Díaz, and C. L. Trujillo, “Cloud and machine learning experiments applied to the energy management in a microgrid cluster,” Appl. Energy, vol. 304, pp. 117770, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gupta, Y. Badr, A. Negahban, and R. G. Qiu, “Energy-efficient heating control for smart buildings with deep reinforcement learning,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 101739, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Singh, P. Chauhan, and N. Jap Singh, “Feasibility of grid-connected solar-wind hybrid system with electric vehicle charging station,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 295–306, 2021. DOI: 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. S. Loganathan and G. Kathiresan, “Performance evolution of hybrid energy generation and static var compensation for stability load analysis using multi-objective partial swarm optimization algorithm,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2270, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en11092270.
   Google Scholar
• M. F. Elnaggar and A. A. Algammal, “Multi-objective optimal predictive energy manage. Control grid-connected residential wind-PV-FC-battery powered charging station plug-in electric vehicle,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 742–751, 2018. DOI: 10.5370/JEET.2018.13.2.742.
   Google Scholar
• G. A. Ghazi et al., “African vulture optimization algorithm-based PI controllers for performance enhancement of hybrid renewable-energy systems,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 8172, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su14138172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. R. Rathish and A. Rajaram, “Hierarchical load balanced routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 16521–16534, 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7459368.
   Google Scholar
• D. Indira et al., “Improved artificial neural network with state order dataset estimation for brain cancer cell diagnosis,” BioMed Res. Int., vol. 2022, pp. 1–10, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7799812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ganesh et al., “Implementation of hidden node detection scheme for self-organization of data packet,” Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput., vol. 2022, pp. 1–9, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1332373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rajaram and K. Sathiyaraj, “An improved optimization technique for energy harvesting system with grid connected power for green house management,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2937–2949, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s42835-022-01033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dinesh et al., “An energy efficient architecture for furnace monitor and control in foundry based on industry 4.0 using IoT,” Sci. Program., vol. 2022, pp. 1–8, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1128717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kannan and A. Rajaram, “Enhanced stable path routing approach for improving packet delivery in MANET,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 4545–4552, 2017. DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2017.6849.
   Google Scholar
• R. P. Prem Anand and A. Rajaram, “Effective timer count scheduling with spectator routing using stifle restriction algorithm in Manet,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 994, no. 1, pp. 012031, 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/994/1/012031.
   Google Scholar
• C. R. Rathish and A. Rajaram, “Efficient path reassessment based on node probability in wireless sensor network,” Int. J. Control Theory Appl., vol. 34, pp. 817–832, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• K. Kumar, K. Vinoth, and A. Rajaram, “Energy efficient and node mobility based data replication algorithm for MANET,” IJCSI., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. R. Rathish and A. Rajaram, “Sweeping inclusive connectivity based routing in wireless sensor networks,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1752–1760, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• K. Mahalakshmi et al., “Public auditing scheme for integrity verification in distributed cloud storage system,” Sci. Program., vol. 2021, pp. 1–5, 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8533995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Divakaran et al., “Technical study on 5G using soft computing methods,” Sci. Program., vol. 2022, pp. 1–7, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1570604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shitharth et al., “Impact of big data analysis on nanosensors for applied sciences using neural networks,” J. Nanomater., vol. 2021, pp. 1–9, 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4927607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar