Teaching Millennials to engage THE environment instead of THEIR environment: A pedagogical analysis

References

• Anson, C., & Beach, R. (1995). Journals in the classroom: Writing to learn. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Appelman, R. (2004, May). Designing experential modes: A key focus for immersive learning environments. TechTrends, 49, 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. D. (1990). Writing space. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (2000). Clock of the long now: Time and responsibility: The ideas behind the world's slowest computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. CHANGE, 32, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. (2006, October 7). The net generation in the classroom. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(7), A34.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. P., & Fry, D. (1992). Coaching writers. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L., Campbell, S. E., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2000, January/February). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 60–83.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A. & Stevens, J. R. (2012). Local science reporting relies on generalists, not specialists. Newspaper Research Journal, 33(3), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X. & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, E. E. (1991). In context: Environmentalism in the system of news. In C. L. LaMay & E. E. Dennis (Eds.), Media and the environment (pp. 55–64). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, E. E., & McCartney, J. (1979). Science journalists on metropolitan dailies: Methods, values and perceptions of their work. Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, J. E., Mays, R. P., & Tipton, J. H. (1997). The use of an accuracy survey to improve student writing. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 52(1), 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dunwoody, S., & Scott, B. T. (1982). Scientists as mass media sources. The entity from which ERIC acquires the content, including journal, organization, and conference names, or by means of online submission from the author. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. M. (1986). The journalist's world. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news (pp. 17–41). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. M. (1991). Two decades of the environmental beat. In C. L. LaMay & E. E. Dennis (Eds.), Media and the environment (pp. 17–28). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1986). Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• George-Palilonis, J. (2010). Research-informed design exercises enhance audience understanding among visual communication students. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 64(4), 414–429.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1981). Scientists on the TV screen. Society, 18, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Guskin, E. (2014, June 25). Newspaper newsrooms suffer large staffing decreases. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Habley, W. R. (1995). First-year students: The year 2000. In M. L. Upcraft & G. L. Kramer (Eds.), First-year academic advising: Patterns in the present, pathways to the future (pp. 3–25). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience & Students in Transition.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, A. M., Jayakar, K. P., & Erickson, K. (2003). The role of trust in virtual and interpersonal environments: Implications for team learning & case method pedagogies. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57(4), 370–383.
   Google Scholar
• Hornig, S. (1990). Science stories: Risk, power and perceived emphasis. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 767–776.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N. (2003). 2003 Presidents Institute: Understanding the Millennial Generation. The Council of Independent Colleges, 11, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jerome, F. (1992). For newspaper science sections: Hard times. SIPIscope, 20, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kanihan, S. F., Neuzil, M., & Bunton, K. (2003). Longitudinal effects of ability groups on newswriting. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 58(2), 120–129.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. T., & Ritchie, S. M. (2013). Academic success in context-based chemistry: Demonstrating fluid transitions between concepts and context. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1159–1182.
   Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M. C. (1990). Making science our own: Public images of science, 1910–1955. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levere, J. L. (1999, January 29). A generation shaped by digital media presents fresh marketing challenges, a study finds. New York Times, p. C3.
   Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, B. V. (1987). Was there really a popular science ‘boom’? Science, Technology & Human Values, 12, 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Massé, M. H. (1999). Evaluating students' progress by reading their journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 54(3), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, A. P. (2005, December). Teaching millennials, our newest cultural cohort. The Education Digest, 71, 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London, UK: King's College London.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2014a). State of the news media 2014. Washington, DC: Pew Research Journalism Project.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2014b). 5 facts about the news business today. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators, Chapter 7. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov./statistics/seind10/c7/c7h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, C. Z. (1979). Readership and coverage of science and technology in newspapers. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, M. A. (2011). Science writing, wikis and collaborative learning. Teaching Millennials in the New Millennium: A Conference on the Theory, Challenges, and Opportunities of Teaching College-Age Students in the 21st Century, Paper 5. Retrieved from http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/millennials/5.
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. (2003, July/August). Boomers & Gen-Xers, Millennials: Understanding the ‘new students.’ EDUCAUSE Review, 38, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, L. D. (1987). Recent composition research is relevant to newswriting. Journalism Educator, 42(3), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Palen, J. A. (1994) A map for science reporters: Science, technology and society studies concepts in basic reporting and newswriting textbooks. The Michigan Academician, 26, 507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). Public's knowledge of science and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004). The state of the news media 2004: An Annual Report on American Journalism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2009). Public praises science; scientists fault public, media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Journalism Project. (2014). Key indicators of media and news. Washington, DC: Pew Research Journalism Project.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends (2014). Millennials in adulthood: Detached from institutions, networked with friends. Washington, DC: Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Poindexter, S. (2003, January/February). The case for holistic learning. Change, 35, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Prato, L. (1991). Covering the environmental beat: An overview for radio and TV journalists. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Radeloff, C., & Bergman, B. J. (2009). Global perspectives: Developing media literacy skills to advance critical thinking. Feminist Teacher, 19(2), 168–171.
   Google Scholar
• Raines, C. (2002). Managing millennials. Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. (pp. 171–185). Rochester, NY: Axzo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, M., & Willis, J. (2001). Experience AI: A practitioner's guide to integrating appreciative inquiry with experiential learning. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students' credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 49–71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., & Stacks, D. W. (1988). Dimensions of writing apprehension among mass communication students. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 384–391.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning and cognition. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schierhorn, A., & Endres, K. (1992). Magazine writing instruction and the composition revolution. Journalism Educator, 47(3), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, M. W., Lane, D. R., & Waldhard, E. S. (1999, July). A review and assessment of national educational trends in communication instruction. Communication Education, 48, 228–237.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2000). Nobody, which means anybody: Audience on the World Wide Web. In S. Gruber (Ed.), Weaving a virtual Web: Practical approaches to new information technologies (pp. 193–200). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Streckfuss, R. (1991). Good writing can be taught with critiques and rewrites. Journalism Educator, 46(3), 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Suleski, J. (2010). Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Swarat S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Tankard, J. W., & Ryan, M. (1974). News source perception of accuracy of science coverage. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 219–225.
   Google Scholar
• Tichenor, P. J., Olien, C. N., Harrison, A., & Donahue, G. (1970). Mass communication systems and communication accuracy in science news reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 673–683.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. J. (2003, September). To be about to be. American Demographics, 25, 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R. (2001, July). Here comes the Millennials. Training, 38, 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak,B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: Amacon, AMA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zurek, J. (1986). Research on writing process can aid newswriting teachers. Journalism Educator, 41(1), 19–23.
   Google Scholar