Does viewing documentary films affect environmental perceptions and behaviors?

References

• Ahammer, I. M., & Murray, J. P. (1979). Kindness in the kindergarten: The relative influence of role playing and prosocial television in facilitating altruism. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2, 133–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Menlove, F. L. (1968). Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, C., & Schultz, P. W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W. A., & Getz, S. K. (1976). Children's social responses following modeled reactions to provocation: Prosocial effects of a television drama. Journal of Personality, 44, 488–500.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, G. (1975). Television and human behavior: The key studies. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, G. (1989). The evolution of American television. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, G., Chaffee, S., & Katzman, N. (1978). Television and human behavior. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, M. (2012). Framing environmental concern: Examining the influence of dire messaging in documentary film on adolescent beliefs and behavior (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawaii, Hilo, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, L. K., & Stein, A. H. (1973). Aggressive and prosocial television programs and the natural behavior of preschool children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(4), Serial No. 151.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, L. K., & Stein, A. H. (1975). Prosocial television and young children: The effects of verbal labeling and role playing on learning and behavior. Child Development, 46, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure sel-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
   Google Scholar
• Harness, H., & Drossman, H. (2011). The environmental education through filmmaking project. Environmental Education Research, 17(6), 829–849.
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, J. E. (2010). Environmental education evaluation: Reinterpreting education as a strategy for meeting mission. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, R. A. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals' attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70–101
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, H., & Volk, T. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, G. (2011). The Al Gore effect: An inconvenient truth and voluntary carbon offsets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(2011), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Karlin, B., & Johnson, J. (2011). Measuring impact: The importance of evaluation for documentary film campaigns. M/C Journal, 14(6), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, P., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenfeld, L. (2010) Can documentary food films like Food Inc. achieve their promise? Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(3), 378–386.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, V., & Huston, H. C. (1983). Can television teach prosocial behavior? Prevention in Human Services, 2, 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Monani, S. (2008) Energizing environmental activism? Environmental justice in extreme oil: The wilderness and oil on ice. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 2(1), 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. M. (2010). An inconvenient truth increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment & Behavior, 42, 643–658.
   Google Scholar
• Opel, A. (2007). Structural change? Environmental documentary and globalization. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1(1), 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rostick, T., & Frentz, T. (2009). Myth and multiple meanings in environmental rhetoric: The case of an inconvenient truth. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. T., & Sprafkin, J. N. (1980). The effects of “Sesame Street's” prosocial spots on cooperative play between young children. Journal of Broadcasting, 24, 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Sprafkin, J. N., Liebert, R. M., & Poulos, R. W. (1975). Effects of a prosocial televised example on children's helping. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Sprafkin, J. N., & Rubinstein, A. (1979). A field correlational study of children's television viewing habits and prosocial behavior. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D. (1995). The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 821–837.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., Bell, P. A., Busby, P. L., & Aasmus, C. (1996). Environmental psychology 1989–1994. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 482–512.
   Google Scholar