Creative Problem Solving: Inside the Maze

References

• Archambault, F. X. (1984). Measurement and evaluation concerns in evaluating programs for the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 7, 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. (1997). Au introduction to cognitive education. London: Routlcdgc.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamlund, D. C. (1959). A comparative study of individual, majority, or group judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt, M. M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effect of classroom moral discussion on children’s moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 4, 129–161.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N. & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving. American Psychologist, 41, 1078–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., & Stein, B. (1993). The ideal problem solver (2nd edition). New York: Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J. & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction, (3ed edition). Columbus: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Alexander, J. & Schwanenflugel, P. (1995). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review, 18. 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, B. (1991). Shaping the future with FPS. Gifted Child Today, 14 (2), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W. (1993). Metacognition and giftedness: The state of the relationship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. & La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decios, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children’s problem solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C.Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Flack, J. (1991). The Future Problem Solving experience-ten years after. Gifted Child Today, 14 (2), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Frasier, M. M., Lee, J. & Winstead, S. (1997). Is the Future Problem Solving Program accomplishing its goals? Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 8, 157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Future Problem Solving Program Australia (2002). Handbook for evaluators. The National Office, Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (1985). Teaching the gifted child (3 ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J. & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem-solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected, and creative (3ed ed). Great Britain: Academic Press Ltd. ( Harcourt, Brace & World).
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, L. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. F. (1975). The managerial decision-making process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd Ed.) Hillsdale: New Jersey: Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Hibel, J. (1991). Future Problem Solving: Taking it beyond the classroom. Gifted Child Today, 14 (2), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Huitt, W. G. (1992). Problem-solving and decision-making: Consideration of individual differences using the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S. (1994). From theory to practice: Promoting problem-finding behavior in children. RoeperReview, 16, 195–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, W. (1979). The mentality of apes. London: Routledge and Kejan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Schäuble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain in development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, P., & Glachan, M. (1985). Facilitation of individual problem solving through peer interaction. Educational Psychology, 5. 217–225.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Giftedncss, diversity and problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, J., & Nielsen, A. B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (2nd ed.) Austin.TX: PRO- ED Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfce (Eds.) The handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. (1959). Evaluation of training in creative problem-solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. (1975). Aha! Insights into creative behavior. Buffalo. N.Y.: DOK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Arc cognitive skills context- bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. (2nd edition). MA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, G. R. (1992) Moral reasoning, moral behavior, and moral giftedness: A developmental perspective. In P. S. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.): To be young and gifted (pp. 321–347). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding creativity and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16, 235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1980). Problem-solving in education. In D. T. Tuma & F. Reif (Eds.) Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching (pp. 81–96). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. [1983]. How can we teach intelligence? ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 242700.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1986a). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.) Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1986b). Synthesis of research on intellectual skills programs: Snake-oil remedies or miracle cures? Educational Leadership, 44, 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Bcn-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B. & Grigorenko, E. (1998). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 667–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1992). The Future Problem Solving Program: An investigation of effects on problem-solving ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 382–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K., & Yarborough, D. W. (1992). Effects of the Future Problem Solving Program on children’s concerns about the future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 190–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New YorkrMacMillan (Reprinted Habner Pub. Co. 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1971). How gifted high school students can continue to grow intellectually. In J. C. Gowan & E. P. Torrance (Eds.). Educating the ablest,( Ch. 14). New York: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Interscholastic brainstorming and creative problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1978). Giftedness in solving future problems. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., & Torrance, J. P. (1978). Developing creativity instructional materials according to the Osborn-Parnes creative problem solving model. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 3, 80–90.
   Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. Heller, F. Monks & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 555–569). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, V. (2001a). FPSP leaves its mark Frontiers, 1, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, V. (2001b). Future Problem Solving - What’s it all about? Gifted, 121. November, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, V. (2003). Confidence building and problem solving skills. Unpublished doctoral thesis: University of New South Wales, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. J. (1996). The effectiveness of the Future Problem Solving Program in New Zealand. Unpublished research project in the Diploma of Education Management course at the Auckland College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Woythal, D. (2002) Teacher, when will we ever use this? ITAG News: The magazine of the Iowa Talented and Gifted Association, 27, Pull-out Section.
   Google Scholar