Scientific Creativity: Idealism versus Pragmatism

References

• Abra, J. (1994). Collaboration in creative work: An initiative for investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H., Barker, P., & Chen, X. (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation on scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnowe, T. (1975). Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations: The supervisor of scientists as a source of assistance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 264–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Wilbur and Orville? Some thought on the Wright brothers and the process of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp.80–92). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multi-level theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense-making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. T. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, W. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassib, H. B. (2010). Where does creativity fit into a productivist industrial model of knowledge production. Gifted and Talented International, 25 (1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, D. (1986). The Reckoning. New York: William Morrow and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1084–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P. (1989). American genesis: A history of the American genius for invention. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Ligon, G. S., Hunsicker, C. M., Mumford, M. D. (2008). Applying multiple knowledge structures in creative thought: Effects on idea generation and problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanigel, R. (1997). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. J. & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (2007). Creative thought cognition and problem-solving in a dynamic system. In M. Runco (Ed.), Creativity Research Handbook: Volume II. (pp. 33–77). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in Organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: Volume IV (pp.11–74). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2007). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter, & K. E. Bedell (Eds.), Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective (pp. 107–154). Oxford England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. A. (1963). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. (2006). Jane Goodall: The woman who redefined man. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basil Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity, (pp. 3–33). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33, 297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Expertise and reason in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies and the laboratory. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development, (pp. 7–42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar