Teachers’ Perceptions of the Socioemotional Development of Intellectually Gifted Primary Aged Students and Their Attitudes Towards Ability Grouping and Acceleration

References

• Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. (2004). Gifted students perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogenous and heterogenous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48 (1), 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S., Bliss, S., Choate, S., & Brown, K. (2007). Serving children who are gifted: Perceptions of undergraduates planning to become teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30 (4), 450–481.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, S., Choate, S. M., & Bliss, S. L. (2006). Perceptions of developmental, social, and emotional issues in giftedness: Are they realistic? Roeper Review, 29 (1), 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Battistich, V., Watson, M., Solomon, D., Lewis, C., & Schapps, E. (1999). Beyond the three R’s: A broad agenda for school reform. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chessor, D., & Whitton, D. (2008). The impact of grouping gifted primary school students on self concept and achievement. TalentEd, 25 (2), 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004) A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. (1997). Psychological and social aspects of educating gifted students. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 (3&4), 180–200.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Training and the Arts (2004). Framework for gifted education Brisbane: The State of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Douthitt, V. (1992). A comparison of adaptive behaviour in gifted and non-gifted children. Roeper Review, 14 (3), 149–151.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, E., Lange, R., & Winebrenner, S. (2002). In search of reality: Unravelling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24 (3), 108–111.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2006). Giftedness in the long term. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 384–403.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Karns, K. (1998). High-achieving students’ interactions and performance on complex mathematical tasks as a function of homogenous and heterogenous pairings. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (2), 227–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F., & Gagnier, N. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26 (3), 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2010). Inventing the wheel: Portraits of acceleration and grouping provisions for the socioemotional and intellectual needs of gifted students in Queensland Primary Schools. PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., Smith, S., & Merrotsy, P. (2010). Early entry: When should a gifted child start school? Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 19 (1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., Smith, S. & Merrotsy, P. (in press). You turn up the first day and they expect you to come back! Gifted students’ perspectives on school and being smart. Gifted and Talented International.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., Smith, S. & Merrotsy, P. (under review). In the dark: Perspectives of parents of gifted students in Queensland primary schools. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect towards academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychology study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52 (3), 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Owen, S. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification achievement and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organisational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83 (6), 313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1997). How ability grouping turns big fish into little fish - or does it? Of optical illusions and optimal environments. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 6 (2), 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (2006a). To group or not to group: is that the question? In C. Smith (Ed.), Including the gifted
   Google Scholar
• and talented: Making inclusion work for more gifted and able learners (pp. 119–137). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (2006b). Exceptionally gifted children: Long term outcomes of academic acceleration and nonacceleration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29 (4), 404–429.
   Google Scholar
• Halsted, J. (2002). Some of my best friends are books (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children over 180 IQ. New York: World Book.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Teacher attitudes toward academic acceleration andaccelerated students in the Netherlands. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29 (1), 30–59.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C., Howley, A., & Pendarvis, E. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitano, M. (1990). Intellectual abilities and psychological intensities in young children: Implications for the gifted. Roeper Review, 13 (1), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. University of Connecticut: National Research Centre on the Education of the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. (2004). Meta-analytic studies of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), Anation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 13–22). Iowa City: Belin-Blank International Centre for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E., & Milton, M. (2005). Attitudes of teachers before and after professional development. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14 (1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1998). Preserving the true self of the gifted child. Roeper Review, 20 (3), 187–191.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22 (1), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Education and Training. (2004). Policy for the education of gifted and talented students. Sydney: NSW DET.
   Google Scholar
• Piechowski, M. (2006). ’Mellow out, ’ they say. If I only could: Intensities and sensitivities of the young and bright. Madison: Yunasa Books.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, M. (2000). Educating teachers to meet the needs of gifted students: An option or a necessity? Talented, 18 (1&2), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2004). Effects of academic acceleration on the social-emotional status of gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 59–68). Iowa City: Belin-Blank Centre for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N., Reis, S., Neihart, M., & Moon, S. (2002). Social and emotional issues facing gifted and talented students: What have we learned and what should we do now? In M. Neihart, S. Reis, N. Robinson, & S. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 267–288). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. (1998). Using current research to make ’good’ decisions about grouping. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 82 (595), 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. (2002). Re-Forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 47–58). Iowa City: Belin-Blank Centre for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing Favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2008). No gift for the talented: A lousy label for any child. Professional Educator, 7 (1), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2006). The relationship between student literacy diversity, instructional differentiation and academic engagement in inclusive primary classrooms. PhD thesis, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Laura, R. (2009). Repersonalising educational ecologies to nurture the social and affective needs of gifted children. Asia-Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 1 (1), 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Southern, W., Jones, E., & Fiscus, E. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33 (1), 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatek, M., & Benbow, C. (1991). Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (4), 528–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teno, K. (2000). Cluster grouping elementary gifted students in the regular classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Gifted Child Today, 23 (1), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, M., & Patrick, H. (1993). Academic and psychosocial apprehensions of teachers and teacher trainees toward the educational acceleration of gifted children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28 (1), 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valpied, J. (2005). The flip side of giftedness: Interactions between gifted characteristics and school responses. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14 (2), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vialle, W., Ashton, T., Carlon, G., & Rankin, F. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colours. Roeper Review, 24 (1), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. (2001). Mis-diagnosis and dual diagnosis of gifted children: Gifted and LD, ADHD, OCD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 15 (1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., & Moon, S. (2006). Counseling needs of gifted students: An analysis of intake forms at a university-based counseling centre. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50 (1), 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar