How do Parents and Teachers of Gifted Students Perceive Group Work in Classrooms?

References

• Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students’ perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 7-20. doi: 10.1177/001698620404800102
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Learning (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Author. Retrieved from: http://education.alberta.ca/media/313361/focusoninquiry.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in education, Volume I: The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and achievement in cooperative learning. College Teaching, 51, 169–175. Retrieved from: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/87567555.asp
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnette, J. J. (2006, June). Effect size and measures of association. Paper presented at the 2006 Summer Evaluation Institute Sponsored by The American Evaluation Association and The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Birmingham, AL. Retrieved from: http://www.eval.org/summerinstitute/06SIHandouts/SI06.Barnette.TR2.Online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. R., & Nelson, S. M. (2009). Cooperative learning and gifted learners. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted and talented students (3rd ed., pp. 565–592). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, L. G., & King, D. A. (1997). Impact of inclusion education on academic achievement, student behaviour and self-esteem, and parental attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 2, 67–80. doi: 10.1080/00220679709597524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Directorate L--Science, Economy and Society. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Moon, S. M. (1992). Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 63–67. doi: 10.1177/001698629203600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, L. R., Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33, 145–159. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2011.580497
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (1983). Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles, but disagreement over modalities. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 7, 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Graue, M. E. (1998, January). Representing relationships between parents and schools: Making visible the force of theory. Paper presented at the Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved from: http://parenthood.library.wisc.edu/Graue/Graue.html
   Google Scholar
• Graue, M. E. (2005). Theorizing and describing preservice teachers’ images of families and schooling. Teachers College Record, 107, 157–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graue, M. E., Kroeger, J., & Prager, D. (2001). A Bakhtinian analysis of particular home-school relations. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 467–498. doi: 10.3102/00028312038003467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiess, H. O. (1996). Statistical concepts for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37–53. Retrieved from: http://soe.sagepub.com/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. (1992). Gifted students talk about cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50, 48–50. Retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership.aspx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melser, N. A. (1999). Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies. Roeper Review, 21, 315. Retrieved from: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/authors/urorauth.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school. mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orbell, J. & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. M. Stephenson, & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 37–65). Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• NGA/CCSSO--National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Québec. (2001). Quebec education program: Preschool education, elementary learning [Programme de formation de l’école québécoise: Éducation préscolaire, enseignement primaire, 1999]. Québec, QC: Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec. Retrieved from: http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/DGFJ/dp/programme_de_formation/primaire/educprg2001h.htm
   Google Scholar
• Québec. (2004). Québec education program: Secondary school education, cycle one. Québec, QC: Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec. Retrieved from: http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/DGFJ/dp/programme_de_formation/secondaire/pdf/qep2004/qepsecfirstcycle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut. (RBDM 9106).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and high ability students. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 282–292). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., & Hall, J. (2008). Teacher models of teaching inquiry. In M. W. Aulls, B. M. Shore, & M. A. B. Delcourt (Eds.), Inquiry in education, Volume II: Overcoming barriers to successful implementation (pp. 235–246). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sankar-DeLeeuw, N. (1999). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 21, 174–179. doi: 10.1080/02783199909553957
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: Competency standards modules. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156207e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. (Trans. M. Cole). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. L., Shore, B. M., & French, L. R. (2011). A theoretical context for examining students’ preferences across ability levels for learning alone or in groups. High Ability Studies. 22, 119–141. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2011.576082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar