School Transition and Mathematically Gifted Students

References

• Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Jacobs, J., Schramm, S., & Splittgerber, F. (2000). School transitions: Beginning of the end or a new beginning? International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Developing mathematical talent: A guide for educating gifted and advanced learners in math. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Athansiou, C. & Philippou, G. N. (2006). Motivation and perceptions of classroom culture in mathematics of students across grades 5 to 7. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.). Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, 81–88). Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Athansiou, C. & Philippou, G. N. (2008). Classroom environment fit in mathematics across the transition from primary to secondary school. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME32 and PMA-NA XXX (Vol. 2, 105–112). Morelia, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan-Brown, J. (1996). Special abilities: A Maori perspective. In D. McAlpine & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (pp. 91–110). Palmerston North: ERDC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cantin, S., & Boivin, M. (2004). Change and stability in children’s social network and self -perceptions during transition from elementary to junior high school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 561–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, K. M., & Shore, B. M. (2000). Mentors’ contributions to gifted adolescents’ affective, social, and vocational development. Roeper Review, 22 (4), 227–231.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1994). Where Is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (2006). Mathematics learning as a social practice. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 147–152). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. I). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jaqueline N. Bank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. J., Guo, A., & Dabbs, C. S. (2007). The state of qualitative research in gifted education as published in American journals: An analysis and critique. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber, S. L., Alexander, K. L., & Entwistle, D. R. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middles grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69, 290–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, H., Goalen, P., & Rudduck, J. (2000). Academic performance, transfer, transition and friendship: Listening to the student voice. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 425–441.
   Google Scholar
• Education Review Office. (2006). The quality of career education and guidance in schools. Wellington: Education Review Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Re-examining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, M. (2000). School transfer and transition. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 321–323.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., & Hargreaves, L. (2002). Transfer and transition. In L. Hargreaves & M. Galton (Eds.), Transfer from the primary classroom: 20years on (pp. 1–27). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., & Morrison, I. (2000). Concluding comments. Transfer and transition: The next steps. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 443–449.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Morrison, I., & Pell, T. (2000). Transfer and transition in English schools: Reviewing the evidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 341–363.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, K., & Hill, J. (2001). Troubled transition: How to ensure that educational transition points do not interrupt student learning. Set: Research information for teachers, 3, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jindal-Snape, D., & Foggie, J. (2008). A holistic approach to primary-secondary transitions. Improving Schools, 11, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Krutetski, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leppien, J. H., & Westberg, K. L. (2006). Roles, responsibilities, and professional qualifications of key personnel for gifted education services. In J. H. Purcell & R. D. Eckert (Eds.), Designing services and programs for high-ability learners: A guidebook for gifted education. (pp. 161–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Iver, D. J. (1990). Meeting the needs of young adolescents: Advisory groups, interdisciplinary teaching teams, and school transition programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 458–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2002). Initiatives in gifted and talented education. Wellington: Ministry of Education
   Google Scholar
• Moon, S. M. (2006). Developing a definition of giftedness. In J. H. Purcell & R. D. Eckert (Eds.), Designing services and programs for high-ability learners (pp. 23–31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. (2006). School transfer and the diffraction of learning trajectories. Research Papers in Education, 21 (1), 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pepperell, J. L., & Rubel, D. J., (2009). The experience of gifted girls transitioning from elementary school to sixth and seventh grade: A grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 14, 341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J. (2000). Transfer to and study at secondary school in Finnish school culture: Developing schools on the basis of pupils’ experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Graham, C. (2005). Needed: Teachers to encourage girls in math, science, and technology. Gifted Child Today, 28 (3), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, T. L., Bevan-Brown, J., Bicknell, B., Carroll-Lind, J., & Kearney, A. (2004). The extent, nature and effectiveness of planned approaches in New Zealand schools for identifying and providing for gifted and talented students. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Sayler, M. (1995). Identifying at-risk gifted students in an early college entrance program. Roeper Review, 18, 126–129.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. B. (2001). Effects of eighth-grade transition programs on high school retention and experiences. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 144–152.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. S., (2006). Examining the long-term impact of achievement loss during the transition to high school. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Teare, B. (1997). Effective provision for able and talented children. Stafford: Network Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2011). Primary-secondary transition: differences between teachers’ and children’s perceptions. Improving Schools, 14, 268–285.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wardekker, W. L. (2000). Criteria for the quality of inquiry. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68 (6), 1198–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, D. R., & Perry, B. (2005). Transition to high school for gifted and mainstream students. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14 (1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar