825
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Self-concept changes in multiple self-concept domains of gifted students participating in a summer residential school

, &

References

  • Aljughaiman, A. M. (2011). Evaluation of math and science summer enrichment programs in Saudi Arabia. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20(2), 10.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431
  • Berndt, T. J., & Burgy, L. (1996). Social self-concept. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept (pp. 171–209). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Brunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A., & Martin, R. (2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 964–981. doi:10.1037/a0019644
  • Byrne, B. M. (2002). Validating the measurement and structure of self-concept: Snapshots of past, present, and future research. American Psychologist, 57, 897–909. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.11.897
  • Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599–613. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.599
  • Byrne, B. M., & Worth Gavin, D. A. (1996). The Shavelson Model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215–228. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.215
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Print, M. (2000). Gifted, streamed, and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51–75. doi:10.1177/000494410004400106
  • Cunningham, L. G., & Rinn, A. (2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents’ self-concepts over time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 326–352. doi:10.1177/016235320703000303
  • Dai, D. Y., Rinn, A. N., & Tan, X. (2013). When the big fish turns small effects of participating in gifted summer programs on academic self-concepts. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 4–26. doi:10.1177/1932202X12473425
  • Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126–138. doi:10.1177/0016986210397831
  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34, 299–309. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.299
  • Enerson, D. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 169–176. doi:10.1177/001698629303700406.
  • Fend, H., & Prester, H.-G. (1986). Dokumentation der Skalen des Projektes „Entwicklung im Jugendalter” [Scale documentation of the project “Development During Adolescence”]. Konstanz, Germany: Universität Konstanz.
  • Fiddyment, G. E. (2014). Implementing enrichment cluster in elementary schools: Lessons learned. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 287–296. doi: 10.11770016986214547635
  • Furlan, N. (2004). Hochbegabte Jugendliche und Sommerakademien in Österreich. Abschlussbericht für das Projekt: Österreichische Sommerakademien [Gifted adolescents and summer academies in Austria. Final report for the project: Austrian summer academies]. Salzburg: Österreichisches Zentrum für Begabtenförderung und Begabungsforschung.
  • Goetz, T., Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Big fish in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21, 185–198. doi:10.1080/10615800701628827.
  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!”: The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 188–205. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
  • Goodenow, C. (1993a). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43. doi:10.1177/0272431693013001002
  • Goodenow, C. (1993b). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(199301)30:1
  • Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Herrmann, J. R., Schmidt, I., Kessels, U., & Preckel, F. (2016). Big fish in big ponds: Contrast and assimilation effects on math and verbal self-concepts of students in within-school gifted tracks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 222–240. doi:10.1111/bjep.12100
  • Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449–465. doi:10.2307/1170496
  • Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H. W., Regner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J., Seaton, M., & Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 156–170. doi:10.1037/a0015558
  • Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19, 201–213. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.001
  • Jonkmann, K., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Social dominance in adolescence: The moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity. Child Development, 80, 338–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01264.x
  • Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 102–116. doi:10.1177/0016986216630607
  • Kunter, M., Schümer, G., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., … Weiß, M. (2002). PISA 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung (Band 72) [PISA 2000: Documentation of assessment tools. Instruments from educational research (vol. 72)]. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
  • Kuster, F., & Orth, U. (2013). The long-term stability of self-esteem, its time-dependent decay, and nonzero asymptote. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 677–690. doi:10.1177/0146167213480189
  • Lenz, K., & Burruss, J. D. (1994). Meeting affective needs through summer academic experiences. Roeper Review, 17, 51. doi:10.1080/02783199409553618
  • Lopez, C., & DuBois, D. L. (2005). Peer victimization and rejection: Investigation of an integrative model of effects on emotional, behavioral, and academic adjustment in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 25–36. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_3
  • Makel, M. C., Lee, S., Olszewki-Kubilius, P., & Putallaz, M. (2012). Changing the pond, not the fish: Following high-ability students across different educational environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 778–792. doi:10.1037/a0027558
  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.299
  • Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self-description questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales: Austra.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376. doi:10.1037/0003-006X.58.5.364
  • Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213–231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
  • Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., & Dillon, D. R. (1994). Long-term effects of a pullout enrichment program based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38–48. doi:10.1177/001698629403800106
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 219–228). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S. A., Wojslawowicz, J. C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2: Theory and methods (2nd ed., pp. 96–161). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2008). Grouping the gifted and talented: Are gifted girls most likely to suffer the consequences? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 54–85. doi:10.4219/jeg-2008-822.
  • Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., Stumpf, E., Motschenbacher, M., Vogl, K., & Schneider, W. (2017). A test of the Reciprocal-Effects-Model of academic achievement and academic self-concept in regular classes and special classes for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 103–116. doi:10.1177/0016986216687824
  • Preckel, F., & Vock, M. (2013). Hochbegabung: Ein Lehrbuch zu Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Fördermöglichkeiten [Giftedness: A textbook about basic principles, diagnostics, and fostering options]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Ramm, G., Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., … Schiefele, U. (Hrsg.) (2006). PISA 2003: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2003: Documentation of assessment tools]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Rinn, A. N., Reynolds, M. J., & McQueen, K. S. (2011). Perceived social support and the self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 367–396. doi:10.1177/016235321103400302
  • Robins, R. W., Donnellan, M. B., Widaman, K. F., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Evaluating the link between self-esteem and temperament in Mexican origin early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 403–410. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.009
  • Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2324
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
  • Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 163–173). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Schwanzer, A. D., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Sydow, H. (2005). Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts junger Erwachsener [Development of a questionnaire on young adults’ self-concept]. Diagnostica, 51, 183–194. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.183
  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little- pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 404–419. doi:10.1037/a0013838
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. doi:10.2307/1170010
  • Trautwein, U. (2003). Schule und Selbstwert. Entwicklungsverlauf, Bedeutung von Kontextfaktoren und Effekte auf die Verhaltensebene [School and self-esteem. Course of development, meaning of context factors and effects on behavior]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Trautwein, U., & Möller, J. (2016). Self-concept: Determinants and consequences of academic self-concept in school contexts. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 187–214). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Tymms, P. (2001). A test of the big fish in a little pond hypothesis: An investigation into the feelings of seven-year-old pupils in school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 161–181. doi:10.1076/sesi.12.2.161.3452
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
  • Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92–98. doi:10.1177/001698629103500208
  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Woolfolk, A. E. (2005). Educational psychology (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.