Alignment of a high-ranked PISA mathematics curriculum and the Parallel Curriculum for gifted students: Is a high PISA Mathematics ranking indicative of curricular suitability for gifted learners?

References

• Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in education, volume 1: The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barfurth, M. A., Ritchie, K. C., Irving, J. A., & Shore, B. M. (2009). A metacognitive portrait of gifted learners. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 397–417). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, G. T. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation. Roeper Review, 26, 190–191. doi:10.1080/02783190409554269
   Google Scholar
• Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1988). Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 248–253. doi:10.1177/001698628803200202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, C., Breton, G., & Smith, J. G. (1997). Mathematics carrousel 3: Teacher’s guide, secondary III/book 1. Montreal, QC: Wilson & Lafleur.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1982). How teachers influence what is taught and learned in classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 83, 1–3. doi:10.1086/461287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butrymowicz, S. (2016). Is Estonia the new Finland? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/06/is-estonia-the-new-finland/488351/
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C. M. (1993). The performance of high ability students in the United States on national and international tests. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013). What do international tests really show about U.S. student performance? Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://s2.epi.org/files/2013/EPI-What-do-international-tests-really-show-about-US-student-performance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Case, B. J., Jorgensen, M. A., & Zucker, S. (2004). Alignment in educational assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/tmrs_rg/AlignEdAss.pdf?WT.mc_id=TMRS_Alignment_in_Educational_Assessment
   Google Scholar
• Chichekian, T., & Shore, B. M. (2014a). Cognitive characteristics of the gifted: Reconceptualized in the context of inquiry learning and teaching. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 119–132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chichekian, T., & Shore, B. M. (2014b). The International Baccalaureate: Contributing to the use of inquiry in higher education teaching and learning. In J. M. Carfora & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Inquiry-based learning for faculty and institutional development: A conceptual and practical resource for educators (pp. 73–97). Bingley, England: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. L. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004a). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The Templeton national report on acceleration, vol. 1. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa. ERIC Document Retrieval Service #ED535137.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. L. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004b). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students: The Templeton national report on acceleration, vol. 2. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa. ERIC Document Retrieval Service #ED535138.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2001). PISA 2000: Measuring up: The performance of Canada’s youth in reading, mathematics, and science—First results for Canadians aged 15. Retrieved from http://www.cmec.ca/pisa/2000/indexe.stm
   Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2012). Measuring Up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study: The performance of Canada’s youth in mathematics, reading, and science—2012 first results for Canadians aged 15. Retrieved from http://cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/318/PISA2012_CanadianReport_EN_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7–31. doi:10.1177/016235320102500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., Shelley, B. E., & Xie, H. (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147. doi:10.1080/1359813042000314682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giambrone, T. M. (1983). Challenges for enriching the curriculum: Algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 76, 262–263. Retrieved from http://labs.jstor.org/demo/stable/27963463
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. T. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-1/math.html (ERIC Digest #E594)
   Google Scholar
• Kaizer, C., & Shore, B. M. (1995). Strategy flexibility in more and less competent students on mathematical word problems. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 113–118. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. P. (1974). The study of mathematically precocious youth. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 23–46). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, D. P., & Crane, L. L. (1990). Domain-general and domain-specific processes in propositional reasoning: A commentary on the Merrill-Palmer Quarterly special issue on cognitive development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 411–424. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428. doi:10.3102/00028312019003415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2005). Teaching models in education of the gifted (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Mathematical Sciences Education Board & National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://standardstrial.nctm.org/document/prepost/cover.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. (1993). Introduction: Cognitive, affective, and situational factors in mathematics and science education. In L. Penner, G. Batasche, H. Knoff, & D. Nelson (Eds.), The challenge in mathematics and science education: Psychology’s response (pp. 51–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Results from 2012: Country note, United States, key findings. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2013). What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (vol. 1). Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, S., & Shore, B. M. (2003). The gifted learner, the novice and the expert: Sharpening emerging views of giftedness. In D. C. Ambrose, L. Cohen, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretical integration (pp. 237–281). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (2015). Advanced academic performance: Exploring country-level differences in the pursuit of educational excellence. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Policy Brief No. 7. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Policy_Briefs/IEA_policy_brief_Aug2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, J. H., Burns, D. E., Tomlinson, C. A., Imbeau, M. B., & Martin, J. L. (2002). Bridging the gap: A tool and technique to analyze and evaluate gifted education curricular units. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 306–321. doi:10.1177/001698620204600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Québec (Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec). (1996). Mathematics 314. Retrieved from http://www.apprendre-math.info/ps/qc/math314.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Québec (Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec). (2001). Québec Education Program approved version. Retrieved from http://www1.education.gouv.qc.ca/sections/programmeformation/primaire/pdf/educprg2001/educprg2001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Québec (Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec). (2013). Mathematics, science and technology. In Québec education program (secondary school education, cycle one) (pp. 181–222). Québec, Canada: Author. Retrieved from http://www1.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/programmeFormation/secondaire1/pdf/chapter61.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S., Eckert, R. D., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2009). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, A. (2010). Your child left behind. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/12/your-child-left-behind/308310/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., & Burroughs, N. A. (2015). Puzzling out PISA: What can international comparisons tell us about American education? American Educator, 39, 24–31. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/ae_spring2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, L. J. (Ed.). (1999). Developing mathematically promising students. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative difference in how gifted children think. In B. M. Shore, & R. C. Friedman (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, E. (1993). Programs for mathematically gifted students: A review of empirical research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 124–131. doi:10.1177/001698629303700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., & Fox, L. H. (Eds.). (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86–93. doi:10.1177/001698628102500208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Ferrari, M. (2004). Giftedness and expertise. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/reports/rm04198/rm04198.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The Parallel Curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., Burns, D. E., & Strickland, C. A., (2006a). The Parallel Curriculum in the classroom, Book 1: Essays for application across the content areas, K–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., Burns, D. E., & Strickland, C. A. (2006b). The Parallel Curriculum in the classroom, Book 2: Units for application across the content areas, K–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., Burns, D. E., Strickland, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2008). The Parallel Curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., Burns, D. E., Strickland, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2009). The Parallel Curriculum multimedia kit: A design to develop learner potential and challenge advanced learners (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonneson, V. C. (2011). Teacher instructional practices designed to meet the individual learning needs of mathematically gifted/talented students in middle school algebra 1. (Doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA). Retrieved from http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3451828
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Landau, M., & Olszewski, P. (1985). Toward developing an appropriate math/science curriculum for gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 3, 257–272. doi:10.1177/016235328500800403
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 13–15. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198903_tassel-baska.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2015). Myth busting: Do high-performing students prefer working alone? Gifted and Talented International, 30, 85–105. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137461
   Google Scholar
• Ward, V. S. (1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. L. (1997, April). Research monograph No. 6. Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://facstaff.wceruw.org/normw/WEBBMonograph6criteria.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, M. L. (2002). Life-span cognitive giftedness: The development of relativistic thinking. In B. M. Shore & R. C. Friedman (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 149–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar