Editorial

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisler, R., Donnelly, G., & Montuori, A. (2016). Creativity, society, and gender: Contextualizing and redefining creativity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, 3(2), 1–33. doi:10.24926/ijps.v3i2.130
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self‐reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1065–1082. doi:10.1002/acp.1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A. (2013). E. Paul Torrance Invited Address: The History of the Psychology of Creativity. National Association for Gifted Children. Indianapolis, IN. November.
   Google Scholar
• Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., Willerson, A., & Mullet, D. R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of creativity in the classroom. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 164–171. doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1446503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8
   Google Scholar
• King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius, 3(1), 1–19. doi:10.1177/2378023117738903
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milli, J., Gault, B., Williams-Baron, E., Xia, J., & Berlan, M. (2016). The gender patenting gap. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, R. (2019). What will it take? Reflections on diversity, equity, and inclusion in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 73(2), 142–144. doi:10.1080/10464883.2019.1633189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S., & Roberts, S. (2019). Technological elites, the meritocracy, and postracial myths in silicon valley. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z3629nh
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., Gentry, M., Whiting, G. W., & McBee, M. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. doi:10.1177/0016986219833738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills. Ohio: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1751–1761. doi:10.1177/0956797615598739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Abdullah, A. M. (2014). Why isn’t creativity being supported? Distressing analyses of grants and awards for creativity research–or lack thereof. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 248–250. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Paek, S., & Jaeger, G. (2015). Is creativity being supported? Further analyses of grants and awards for creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 107–110. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.992692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storage, D., Horne, Z., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2016). The frequency of “brilliant” and “genius” in teaching evaluations predicts the representation of women and African Americans across fields. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150194. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1935). The promise of youth. Genetic studies of genius. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, B. (2016). An analysis and meta-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23–33. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126734
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2014). Who’s afraid of the big bad dragon: Why China has the best (and worst) education system in the world. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar