Increasing Follow-Up Rates in Longitudinal Studies of Women with Alcohol Use Disorders

REFERENCES

• Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bootsmiller, B. J., Ribisl, K. M., Mowbray, C. T., Davidson, W. S., Walton, M. A., & Herman, S. E. (1998). Methods of ensuring high follow-up rates: Lessons from a longitudinal study of dual diagnosed participants. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 2665–2685. doi:10.3109/10826089809059344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boys, A., Marsden, J., Stillwell, G., Hatchings, K., Griffiths, P., & Farrell, M. (2003). Minimizing respondent attrition in longitudinal research: Practical implications from a cohort study of adolescent drinking. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 363–373. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00011-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. A., & Pepperell, J. L. (2009). Women, girls, and addiction: Celebrating the feminine in counseling treatment and recovery. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. J., Langhorst, D. M., Meshberg-Cohen, S., & Svikis, D. S. (2011). Adapting an HIV/STDs prevention curriculum to fit the needs of women with alcohol problems. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 11, 352–374. doi:10.1080/1533256X.2011.619938
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claus, R. E., Kindleberger, L. R., & Dugan, M. C. (2002). Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 34(1), 69–74. doi:10.1080/02791072.2002.10399938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, R. B., Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Navratil, J. L. (2002). Innovative retention methods in longitudinal research: A case study of the developmental trends study. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 11, 485–498. doi:10.1023/A:1020939626243
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, R. B., Burke, J. D., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Loeber, R. (2005). Contacting participants for follow-up: How much effort is required to retain participants in longitudinal studies? Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(1), 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottler, L. B., Compton, W. M., Ben-Abdallah, A., Horne, M., & Claverie, D. (1996). Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 41, 209–217. doi:10.1016/0376-8716(96)01254-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, M. C., Alati, R., Ware, R. S., & Kinner, S. A. (2013). Attrition in a longitudinal study with hard-to-reach participants was reduced by ongoing contact. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66, 575–581. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, D. P., Maddux, J. F., Johnson, T. H., & Confer, B. A. (1995). Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12(2), 95–102. doi:10.1016/0740-5472(94)00076-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Bassel, N., & Schilling, R. F. (1992). 15-month follow-up of women methadone patients taught skills to reduce heterosexual HIV transmission. Public Health Reports, 107, 500–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabee, D., Hawken, A., & Griffith, P. (2011). Tracking and incentivizing substance abusers in longitudinal research: Results of a survey of National Institute on drug Abuse-funded investigators. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 5(2), 87–91. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e11740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., Croft, J. R., Dugosh, K. L., Mastro, N. K., Lee, P. A., & Patapis, N. S. (2005). Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 78, 275–281. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstein, D. R., & Johnson, R. A. (2000). Nonresponse and selection bias in treatment follow-up studies. Substance Use & Misuse, 35, 971–1014. doi:10.3109/10826080009148429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansten, M. L., Downey, L., Rosengren, D. B., & Donovan, D. M. (2000). Relationship between follow-up rates and treatment outcomes in substance abuse research: More is better but when is “enough” enough? Addiction, 95, 1403–1416. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.959140310.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, M. A., Price, A. M., Burnett-Zeigler, I., Perron, B., Islam, K., Bohnert, A. S., & Zivin, K. (2011). Longitudinal predictors of addictions treatment utilization in treatment-naïve adults with alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 113, 215–221. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, G. K., McAuliffe, W. E., & Nurco, D. N. (1991). Recommendations for followup sampling. In D. N. Nurco (Ed.), Follow-up fieldwork: AIDS outreach and IV drug abuse ( pp. 15–30). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kleschinsky, J. H., Bosworth, L. B., Nelson, S. E., Walsh, E. K., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Persistence pays off: Follow-up methods for difficult-to-track longitudinal samples. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 751–761. doi:10.15288/jsad.2009.70.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorst, D. M., Choi, Y. J., Keyser-Marcus, L., & Svikis, D. S. (2012). Reducing sexual risk behaviors for HIV/STDs in women with alcohol use disorders. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 367–379. doi:10.1177/1049731512441683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzger, D. P. I., Peters, R., Smith, I., Grissom, G., … Argeriou, M. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199–213. doi:10.1016/0740-5472(92)90062-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, K., Webb, A., Frantz, J., & Randall, M. (2003). What does it take to retain substance-abusing adolescents in research protocols? Delineation of effort required, strategies undertaken, costs incurred, and 6-month post-treatment differences by retention difficulty. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 69(1), 73–85. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00252-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navratil, J. L., Green, S. M., Loeber, R., & Lahey, B. B. (1994). Minimizing subject loss in a longitudinal study of deviant behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 89–106. doi:10.1007/BF02233913
   Google Scholar
• Needle, R., Fisher, D. G., Weatherby, N., Chitwood, D., Brown, B., Cesari, H., … Braunstein, M. (1995). Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 242–250. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.9.4.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes, S., Wish, E., Wraight, B., & Messina, N. (2002). Correlates of treatment follow-up difficulty. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(1), 19–45. doi:10.1081/JA-120001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passetti, L. L., Godley, S. H., Scott, C. K., & Siekmann, M. (2000). A low-cost follow-up resource: Using the World Wide Web to maximize client location efforts. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 195–203. doi:10.1177/109821400002100206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, R., Slesnick, N., Bantchevska, D., Guo, X., & Kim, Y. (2011). Predictors of follow-up completion among runaway substance-abusing adolescents and their primary caretakers. Community Mental Health Journal, 47, 220–226. doi:10.1007/s10597-009-9281-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. M., Armor, D. J., & Braiker, H. B. (1980). The course of alcoholism: Four years after treatment. Editorial note. British Journal of Addiction, 75, 343. doi:10.1111/add.1980.75.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, M. L., Urada, D., & Podus, D. (2001). Meta-analysis of HIV risk-reduction interventions within drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 389–405. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.69.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, R. F., El-Bassel, N., Schinke, S. P., Gordon, K., & Nichols, S. (1991). Building skills of recovering women drug users to reduce heterosexual AIDS transmission. Public Health Reports, 106, 297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. K. (2004). A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74(1), 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1996). Timeline followback user’s guide: A calendar method for assessing alcohol and drug use ( 3.11.007). Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, P., & Smith, R. L. (2009). Substance abuse counseling: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tross, S., Campbell, A. N., Cohen, L. R., Calsyn, D., Pavlicova, M., Miele, G., … & Nunes, E. V. (2008). Effectiveness of HIV/STD sexual risk reduction groups for women in substance abuse treatment programs: Results of a NIDA clinical trials network trial. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 48(5), 581–589. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817efb6e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, M. A., Ramanathan, C. S., & Reischl, T. M. (1998). Tracking substance abusers in longitudinal research: Understanding follow-up contact difficulty. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 233–253. doi:10.1023/A:1022128519196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherby, N. L., Needle, R., Cesari, H., Booth, R., McCoy, C. B., Watters, J. K., & Chitwood, D. D. (1994). Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 347–355. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(94)90035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeterian, J. D., Dow, S. J., & Kelly, J. F. (2012). Ensuring retention in longitudinal studies: A practical evaluation of an intensive follow-up protocol and suggested adaptations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 15, 369–383. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.623958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar