We-ness Questionnaire: Development and Validation

References

• Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acitelli, L. K., Rogers, S., & Knee, C. R. (1999). The role of identity in the link between relationship thinking and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(5), 591–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599165003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, C. R., & Etcheverry, P. E. (2006). Cognitive interdependence considering self-in-relationship. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 274–293). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significant for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11031-002
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Test manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test manual]. Huber & Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., & Randall, A. K. (2020). General and health-related stress and couple’s coping. In K. S. Wampler (Ed.), The Handbook of Systemic Family Therapy. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., & Falconier, M. K. (2016). Coping in couples: The systemic transactional model (STM). In M. K. Falconier, A. K. Randall, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 5–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an Oral History Interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295
   Google Scholar
• Butler, E. A., Young, V., & Randall, A. K. (2010). Suppressing to please, eating to cope: The effect of overweight women’s emotion suppression on romantic relationships and eating. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 599–623. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrère, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlyweds couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., Bodenmann, G., Schneider, H., & Bradbury, T. (2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, B. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergus, K. D., & Reid, D. W. (2001). The couple’s mutual identity and reflexivity: A systemic-constructivist approach to the integration of persons and systems. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 11(3), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016658301629
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J., & Fitness, J. (1996). Introduction in knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Gottman, J. S. (2008). And baby makes three: The six-step plan for preserving marital intimacy and rekindling romance after baby arrive. Random House Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). Dysfunctional marital conflict: Women are being unfairly blamed. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 31(3/4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v31n03_01
   Google Scholar
• Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve?. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist , 34(5), 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structure and processes. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. L., & Tangney, J. P. (2012). Handbook of self and identity. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leuchtmann, L., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Interpersonal view on physical illnesses and mental disorders: A systemic-transactional understanding of disorders. Swiss Archives of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 168(6), 170–174.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perinelli, E., & Gremigni, P. (2016). Use of social desirability scales in clinical psychology: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Jimenez-Arista, L. E., Walsh, K. J., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic coping in the U.S.: Psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Current Psychology, 35(4), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9323-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. W., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Identification with the relationship as essential to marital resilience: Theory, application, and evidence. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple Resilience: Emerging perspectives. (pp. 139–161). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. W., Dalton, E. J., Laderoute, K., Doell, F. K., & Nguyen, T. (2006). Therapeutically induced changes in couple identity: The role of we-ness and interpersonal processing in relationship satisfaction. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 241–284. https://doi.org/10.3200/mono.132.3.241-288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. W., Doell, F. K., Dalton, E. J., & Ahmad, S. (2008). Systemic-constructivist couple therapy (SCCT): Description of approach, theoretical advances, and published longitudinal evidence. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.).), 45(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270–1279. (1270). 1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. A., Labunko, B., Alea, N., & Baddeley, J. L. (2015). Mutuality and Marital Engagement – Type of Union Scale [ME (To US)]: Empirical support for a clinical instrument in couples therapy. In K. Skerrett & K. Fergus (Eds.), Couple resilience (pp. 108–119). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totenhagen, C. J., Curran, M. A., Serido, J., & Butler, E. A. (2013). Good days, bad days: Do sacrifices improve relationship quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(7), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512472475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totenhagen, C. J., Randall, A. K., & Lloyd, K. (2018). Stress and relationship functioning in same-sex couples, The vulnerabilities of internalized homophobia and outness. Family Relations, 67(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totenhagen, C. J., Randall, A. K., Cooper, A., Tao, C., & Walsh, K. J. (2017). Stress spillover and crossover in same-sex couples: Concurrent and lagged daily effects. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 31, 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2016.1203273
   Google Scholar