495
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Top Global Firms’ Use of Brand Profile Pages on SNS for Marketing Communication

, &

REFERENCES

  • Acar, A. S., and M. Polonsky. 2007. Online social networks and insights into marketing communications. Journal of Internet Commerce 6 (4): 55–72. doi:10.1080/15332860802086227.
  • Ahn, H., M. W. Kwon, and Y. Sung. 2010. Online brand community across cultures: A comparison between the USA and Korea. International Journal of e-Business Management 4 (1): 34–52. doi:10.3316/ijebm0401034.
  • Boyd, D. M., and N. B. Ellison. 2008. Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–30. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
  • Bryman, B., and E. Bell. 2007. Business research methods. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Calisir, F. 2003. Web advertising vs. other media: Young consumers’ view. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13 (5): 356–63. doi:10.1108/10662240310501630.
  • Cassidy, J. 2006. Me media: How hanging out in the Internet became big business. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/15/060515fa_fact_cassidy (accessed October 20, 2014).
  • Cooke, M., and N. Buckley. 2008. Web 2.0, Social networks and the future of market research. International Journal of Market Research 50 (2): 267–92.
  • Dou, W., and Krishnamurthy, S. 2007. Using brand websites to build brands online: A product versus service brand comparison. Journal of Advertising Research 47 (2): 193–206. doi:10.2501/s0021849907070225.
  • Facebook. 2014. Statistics. http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Foster, M. K., A. Francescucci, and B. C. West. 2010. Why users participate in online social networks. International Journal of e-Business Management 4 (1): 3–19. doi:10.3316/ijebm0401003.
  • Gangadharbatla, H. 2008. Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and Internet self-efficacy as predictors of the igeneration's attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8 (2): 5–15. doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722138.
  • Goksu, F. 2011. Use of social media in Turkey in the context of brand communication. In Proceedings: The VI Congres Internacional Comunicacio I Realitat, Facultat De Comunicacio Blanquerna. Universitat Ramon Llull. Tripodos Extra, Barcelona, Spain. http://cicr.blanquerna.url.edu/congres_vi/actas/dades/ambit2/13.G%C3%B6ksu.pdf (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Goldsmith, R. E. 2001. Using the domain specific innovativeness scale to identify innovative Internet consumers. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11:149–58. doi:10.1108/10662240110695098.
  • Haigh, M. H., P. Brubaker, and E. Whiteside. 2013. Facebook: Examining the information presented and its impact on stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 18 (1): 52–69. doi:10.1108/13563281311294128.
  • Hargittai, E. 2008. Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 276–97. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x.
  • Hargittai, E., and Y. P. Hsieh. 2010. Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication & Society 13 (4): 515–36. doi:10.1080/13691181003639866.
  • Haridakis, P., and G. Hanson. 2009. Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53 (2): 317–35. doi:10.1080/08838150902908270.
  • Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content analysis for the social science and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Horsham District Council. 2014. Business opportunities. http://www.horsham.gov.uk/business/9710.aspx (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Interbrand. 2009a. Best global brands 2009: The definitive guide to the world's most valuable brands. http://www.interbrand.com/Libraries/Branding_Studies/Best_Global_Brands_2009.sflb.ashx (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Interbrand. 2009b. Best Australian brands 2009: Ranked by brand value. http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/-1_BestAustralianBrands_2009.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Interbrand. 2009c. Japan's best global brands 2009. http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/83_83_0218jbgb_report.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Interbrand. 2009d. Mejores marcas españolas 2009: Ranking por valor de marca. http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/-1_BSB09.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Interbrand. 2009e. Die besten: Das ranking der Schweizer marken. Bilanz, 3. http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/-1_BILANZ_BestSwissBrands.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Interbrand. 2009f. Top Taiwan global brands 2009: Ranked by brand value. http://www.interbrand.com/images/studies/-1_Top_Taiwan_Global_Brands_2009_%28Final_MB%29.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010).
  • Jansen, B. J., M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2169–2188.
  • Jensen, M. B., and A. L. Jepsen. 2006. Online marketing communications: Need for a new typology of IMC? In Contemporary issues in corporate and marketing communications: Towards a socially responsible future, ed. K. Podnar and Z. Jancic 1st ed., 133–143. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Pristop.
  • Ju, A., H. J. Sun, and I. C. Hsiang. 2014. Will social media save newspaper? Examining the effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter as news platforms. Journalism Practice 8 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.794022.
  • Kaplan, A. M., and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizon 53:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
  • Kuhn, A., and K. S. Burns. 2008. From Myspace to brand space: Elements of brand sponsored Myspace profiles. In Proceedings of the 2008: Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, ed. S. Rodgers, 242–55.
  • Leung, X. Y., B. Bai, and K. A. Stahura. 2013. The marketing effectiveness of social media in the hotel industry: A comparison of Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 39 (2): 147–69.
  • Liu, H. 2008. Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 252–75. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00395.x.
  • Mabry, E., and L. Porter. 2010. Movies and Myspace: The effectiveness of official web sites versus online promotional contests. Journal of Interactive Advertising 10 (2): 1–15. doi:10.1080/15252019.2010.10722166.
  • McCullough Johnston, K. 2001. Why e-business must evolve beyond market orientation: Applying human interaction model to computer mediated corporate communications. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11 (2): 213–25. doi:10.1108/10662240110396937.
  • McNeil, A. 2012. How Facebook beat Myspace. http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0212/how-facebook-beat-myspace.aspx (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Mesch, G. 2009. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 12 (4): 387–93. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
  • Miller, S. E., and L. A. Jensen. 2007. Connecting and communicating with students on Facebook. Computers in Libraries 27 (8): 18–22.
  • Muise, A., E. Christofides, and S. Desmarais. 2009. More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyber Psychology & Behavior 12 (4): 441–44. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0263.
  • Mulder, H. P., and N. R. Dekker. 2010. Social networking: Your business clients and their employees are doing it … Are you advising your clients on how to manage the legal risks? The Michigan Business Law Journal Summer: 44–48.
  • Murphy, J., L. Raffa, and R. Mizerski. 2003. The use of domain name in e-branding by world's top brands. Electronic Markets 13 (3): 222–32. doi:10.1080/1019678032000108310.
  • Paradise, A., and M. Sullivan. 2012. (In)Visible threats? The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of Facebook. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15 (1): 55–60. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0054.
  • Pelling, E. L., and K. M. White. 2009. The theory of planned behavior applied to young people's use of social networking web sites. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 12 (6): 755–59. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0109.
  • Penman, J., and J. Thalluri. 2014. Addressing diversity in health science students by enhancing flexibility through e-learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 12 (1): 89–100.
  • Perry, M., and C. Bodkin. 2000. Content analysis of fortune 100 company web sites. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 5 (2): 87–97. doi:10.1108/13563280010338331.
  • Robbins, S. S., and A. C. Stylianou. 2003. Global corporate web sites: An empirical investigation of content and design. Information & Management 40 (3): 205–12. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00002-2.
  • Rowley, J. 2001. Remodeling marketing communications in an Internet environment. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11 (3): 203–12. doi:10.1108/10662240110397017.
  • Shintaro, O., and F. A. Rivas. 2002. A content analysis of multinational's web communication strategies: Cross-cultural research framework and pre-testing. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Application and Policy 12 (5): 380–90. doi:10.1108/10662240210447137.
  • Statista: The Statistics Portal. 2014. Leading social networks worldwide as of June 2014, ranked by number of active users (in millions). http://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Statistic Brain. 2014. Facebook statistic. http://www.statisticbrain.com/facebook-statistics/ (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Takahashi, T. 2010. Myspace or Mixi? Japanese engagement with SNS (social networking sites) in the global age. New Media & Society 12 (3): 453–75. doi:10.1177/1461444809343462.
  • Tan, L. W., and R. Yazdanifard. 2014. Impact of Facebook marketing on proper communication and interaction with customers. Working paper. Center for Southern New Hampshire University Program. http://C:/Users/hherjant/Downloads/Impact%20of%20Facebook%20Marketing%20on%20proper%20communcation%20and%20interacion%20with%20customer.pdf (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Thelwall, M., D. Wilkinson, and S. Uppal. 2010. Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in Myspace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (1): 190–99. doi:10.1002/asi.21180.
  • Tufekci, Z. 2008. Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Information, Communication & Society 11 (4): 544–64. doi:10.1080/13691180801999050.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., J. Peter, and A. P. Schouten. 2006. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 9 (5): 584–90. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584.
  • Weare, C., and W.-Y. Lin. 2000. Content analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and challenges. Social Science Computer Review 18 (3): 272–92. doi:10.1177/089443930001800304.
  • Zhang, J., Y. Sung, and W. Lee. 2010. To play or not to play: An exploratory content analysis of branded entertainment in Facebook. American Journal of Business 25 (1): 53–64. doi:10.1108/19355181201000005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.