Embedded Librarians: Just-In-Time or Just-In-Case? A Research Study

REFERENCES

• Ackerson, L.G., Howard, J.G., & Young, V.E. (1991). Assessing the relationship between library instruction methods and the quality of undergraduate research. Research Strategies, 9, 139–141.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerson, L.G., & Young, V.E. (1994). Evaluating the impact of library instruction methods on the quality of student research. Research Strategies, 12, 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, C.C., Nielsen, K., Desmet, C., & Balthazor, R. (2009). Collaboration is key: Librarians and composition instructors analyze student research and writing. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 9(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, E., & Simning, J. (2010). Embedded librarians and reference traffic: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5/6), 443–457.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, D., & Owens, R. (2008). Providing services to online students: Embedded librarians and access to resources. Mississippi Libraries, 72(3), 57–59.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, K., & Kvenild, C. (2010). Embedding in the 21st century academy: Crossing curriculum and geography. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Carlock, D., & Anderson, J. (2007). Teaching and assessing the database searching skills of student nurses. Nurse Educator, 32(6), 251–255. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299477.57185.ba
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S., & Chinburg, S. (2010). Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A citation analysis. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5/6), 530–542.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P.M. (2002). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update. College & Research Libraries, 63(1), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P.M., & Cohen, S.A. (2001). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996–1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, B.I. (2004). The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations. Resource Sharing and Information Networks, 17(1/2), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dinwiddie, M. (2005). Looking for ways to provide online library services equal to on-campus. Distance Education Report, 9(18), 8–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, M. (2008). Embedded librarians in an ag econ class: Transcending the traditional. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 9(4), 301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M.E. (2011). Online embedded librarian case study: A descriptive evaluation. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0043575/EDWARDS_M.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., Kumar, S., & Ochoa, M. (2010). Assessing the value of embedded librarians in an online graduate educational technology course. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2/3), 271–291.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Vinent, I.J., & Carello, C.A. (2008). Embedded library instruction in a first-year biology laboratory course. Science & Technology Libraries, 28(4), 325–351.
   Google Scholar
• Figa, E., Bone, T., & Macpherson, J.R. (2009). Faculty-librarian collaboration for library services in the online classroom: Student evaluation results and recommended practices for implementation. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 3(2), 67–102.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, M. (2012). Making embedded librarians a part of an online community of learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 6(1), 19–27. doi: 10.1080/1533290X.2012.660879
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2007). Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 332–353. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, A.J., & Eisenberg, M.B. (2009). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hillsborough Community College. (2013). HCC Factbook 2012. Retrieved from http://www.hccfl.edu/media/713113/final%20factbook%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hines, S.S. (2008). How it's done: Examining distance education library instruction and assessment. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3/4), 467–478.
   Google Scholar
• Hovde, K. (1999). Check the citation: Library instruction and student paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 17(1), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, S., & Leonard, J. (2007). Garbage in, garbage out: The effect of library instruction on the quality of students’ term papers. Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 8(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kesselman, M.A., & Watstein, S.B. (2009). Creating opportunities: Embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• Knight-Davis, S., & Sung, J.S. (2008). Analysis of citations in undergraduate papers. College & Research Libraries, 69(5), 447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, D.F., & Wilson, L.A. (1986). Effectiveness of course-integrated bibliographic instruction in improving coursework. RQ, 26(2), 206–211.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibiger, C.A. (2011). Google reigns triumphant? Stemming the tide of Googlitis via collaborative, situated information literacy instruction. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30(4), 187–222. doi: 10.1080/01639269.2011.628886
   Google Scholar
• Lindauer, B.G. (1985). Toward a methodology for evaluating research paper bibliographies. Research Strategies, 3, 170–177.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, D., & Videon, C. (1997). Assessing undergraduate use of electronic resources: A quantitative analysis of works cited. Research Strategies, 15(3), 151–158. doi: 10.1016/S0734-3310(97)90035-5
   Google Scholar
• Markgraf, J.S. (2004). Librarian participation in the online classroom. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 9(1/2), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Matthew, V., & Schroeder, A. (2006). The embedded librarian program. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(4), 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• McMillen, P., & Fabbi, J. (2010). How to be an E3 librarian. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2/3), 174–186. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2010.497454
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, W. (2000). Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic information searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(5), 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A.M., & Schlegl, K. (2004). Student bibliographies improve when professors provide enforceable guidelines for citations. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 4(2), 275–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank, J.D., & Dewald, N.H. (2003). Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services to the virtual classroom. Information Technology and Libraries, 22(1), 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumaker, D., & Talley, M. (2009). Models of embedded librarianship: Final report. Retrieved from http://hq.sla.org/pdfs/EmbeddedLibrarianshipFinalRptRev.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, M.R., & Miyamoto, M.M. (2002). The role of medical libraries in undergraduate education: A case study in genetics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(2), 181–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. (2009). Information literacy assessment: Where do we start? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 19–28. doi: 10.1177/0961000608099896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G., & Hepworth, M. (2013). Using assignment data to analyse a blended information literacy intervention: A quantitative approach. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 45(1), 53–63. doi: 10.1177/0961000611434999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, K.D., & Pier, P.M. (2010). Embedded information literacy in the basic oral communication course: From conception through assessment. Public Services Quarterly, 6, 259–270. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2010.497455
   Google Scholar
• York, A.C., & Vance, J.M. (2009). Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1/2), 197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Young, V.E., & Ackerson, L.G. (1995). Evaluation of student research paper bibliographies: Refining evaluation criteria. Research Strategies, 13, 80–93.
   Google Scholar