876
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Library Connection: An Interactive, Personalized Orientation for Online Students

&

References

  • Association of College & Research Libraries (2016). Standards for distance learning library services. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/guidelinesdistancelearning
  • Bolin, A. U., Khramtsova, I., & Saarnio, D. (2005). Using student journals to stimulate authentic learning: Balancing bloom’s cognitive and affective domains. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 154–159.
  • Bowen, W. G.. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing people for rapidly changing environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 1–3.
  • Brown, A. G., Weingart, S., Johnson, J. R. S., & Dance, B. (2004). Librarians don’t bite: Assessing library orientation for freshmen. Reference Services Review, 32(4), 394–403. doi:10.1108/00907320410569752
  • Cahoy, E. S., & Bichel, R. M. (2004). A luau in the library? College & Undergraduate Libraries, 11 (1), 49–60. doi:10.1300/J106v11n01_06
  • Castano-Munoz, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2014). The internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149–159. doi:10.1111/bjet.12007
  • Chen, S. (2010). The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1123–1130. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.009
  • Churkovich, M., & Oughtred, C. (2002). Can an online tutorial pass the test for library instruction? An evaluation and comparison of library skills instruction methods for first year students at Deakin University. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 33(1), 25–38.
  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Education & Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. doi:10.3102/00346543053004445
  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z
  • Delahunty, J., Verenikina, I., & Jones, P. (2014). Socio-emotional connections: Identity, belonging, and learning in online interactions. A literature review. Technology: Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 243–265. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.813405
  • Diamond, W., & Pease, B. (2001). Digital reference: A case study of question types in an academic library. Reference Services Review, 29(3), 210–219. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005663
  • Farrell, S. L., Driver, C., & Weathers, A. (2011). Now’s the time: Online library orientation. Community & Junior College Libraries, 17(1), 7–14. doi:10.1080/02763915.2011.547142
  • Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132.
  • Gamrat, C., Toomey-Zimmerman, H., Dudek, J., & Peck, K. (2014). Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1136–1148. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9291-7
  • Germain, C. A., Jacobson, T. E., & Kaczor, S. A. (2000). A comparison of the effectiveness of presentation formats for instruction: Teaching first-year students. College & Research Libraries, 61(1), 65–72.
  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.
  • Goligoski, E. (2012). Motivating the learner: Mozilla’s open badges program. Access to Knowledge: A Course Journal, 4(1), 1–8.
  • Gonzales, B. M. (2014). Online tutorials and effective information literacy instruction for distance learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1-2), 45–55. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.898011
  • Harmon, J., & Copeland, A. (2016). Students’ perceptions of digital badges in a public library management course. Education for Information, 32(1), 87–100. doi:10.3233/EFI-150964
  • Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.
  • Head, A. J. (2013). Project information literacy: What can be learned about the information- seeking behavior of today’s college students? Invited Paper, Association of College & Research Librarians Conference, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2281511
  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71. doi:10.14742.ajet.1701
  • Holman, L. (2000). A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographic instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 40(1), 53–60.
  • Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M., D., Wassertheurer, S., & Hessinger, M. (2009). Learning performance with interactive simulations in medical education: Lessons learned from results of learning complex physiological models with the HAEMOdynamics SIMulator. Computers &Education, 52(2), 292–301. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.008
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.
  • Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In Sawyer, R. K (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1), 1–15. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.131
  • Nichols, J., Shaffer, B., & Shockey, K. (2003). Changing the face of instruction: Is online or in-class more effective?. College & Research Libraries, 64(5), 378–388. doi:10.5860/crl.64.5.378
  • Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing information literacy to empower learners. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berg, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269
  • Pashia, A., & Critten, J. (2015). Ethnography as pedagogy in library orientation. Journal of Information Literacy, 9(2), 84–93.
  • Penn State University Budget Office (2017). Fall to fall enrollment comparison. Penn State Fact Book: Facts about Students. Retrieved from https://budget.psu.edu/factbook/StudentDynamic/EnrollmentFallToFallComparison.aspx?SemesterCodes=201617FA201718FA&FBPlusIndc = N
  • Raish, V. (2016). A content analysis of virtual science labs in cyber charter schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ETDA Penn State Libraries.
  • Rughinis, R. (2013). Talkative objects in need of interpretation. Re-thinking digital badges in education. Proceedings from the Chi'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shade, L. R., & Dechief, D. Y. (2007). Canda’s SchoolNet: Wiring up schools? In A.A. Carr-Chellman (Ed.), Global perspectives of e-learning: Rhetoric and reality (pp. 131–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Shen, L. (2016). Both online and in-person library orientations have positive effects on graduate students’ information literacy skills. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(2), 189–191. doi:10.18438/B8C620
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Elearnspace. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
  • Silver, S. L., & Nickel, L. T. (2005). Are online tutorials effective? A comparison of online and classroom library instruction methods. Research Strategies, 20(4), 389–396. doi:10.1016/j.resstr.2006.12.012
  • Stonebraker, I., Robertshaw, M. B., & Moss, J. D. (2016). Student see versus student do: A comparative study of two online tutorials. TechTrends, 60(2), 176–182. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0026-7
  • Stiwinter, K. (2013). Using an interactive online tutorial to expand library instruction. Internet. Reference Services Quarterly, 18(1), 15–41. doi:10.1080/10875301.2013.777010
  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross- case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355. doi:10.1177/0022487111404241
  • Thompson, V. L. S. (2013). Making decisions in a complex information environment: Evidential preference and information we trust. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(S7). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-S3-S7
  • Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853–869. doi:10.1353/pla.2011.0030
  • Walker, A. M., Lee, F., & Lonn, S. (2015). Scaffolds: Experimenting with student-driven digital badging in an iSchool context. Iconference 2015 Proceedings, Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110790
  • Walsh, J. (2008). The effects of library orientation on student usage of the library. Library Hi Tech News, 25(1), 27–29. doi:10.1108/07419050810877535
  • Zhang, Q., Goodman, M., & Xie, S. (2015). Integrating library instruction into the course management system for a first-year engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring the effectiveness of blended learning on students’ information literacy levels. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 934–958. doi:10.5860/crl.76.7.934

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.