Designing an online graduate community for research practice: Going beyond single purpose design

References

• Anderson, R., Fisher, K., & Walker, J. (2021). Library consultations and a global pandemic: An analysis of consultation difficulty during COVID-19 across multiple factors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102273. preprint. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EdTech e-Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
   Google Scholar
• Bellard, E. M. (2005). Information literacy needs of nontraditional graduate students in social work. Research Strategies, 20(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resstr.2006.12.019
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A. (2014). LibGuides and web-based library guides in comparison: Is there a pedagogical advantage? Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.903709
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, L. C. O. (2006). Graduate student centers: Building community and involving students. New Directions for Student Services, 2006(115), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.218
   Google Scholar
• Brinkman, S. N., & Hartsell-Gundy, A. A. (2012). Building trust to relieve graduate student research anxiety. Public Services Quarterly, 8(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2011.591680
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, A. (2004). Library anxiety: A decade of empirical research. Library Review, 53(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530410526583
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Craddock, S., Birnbaum, M., Rodriguez, K., Cobb, C., & Zeeh, S. (2011). Doctoral students and the impostor phenomenon: Am I smart enough to be here? Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.6321
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, P., & Steeleworthy, M. (2013). Incorporating online instruction in academic libraries: Getting ahead of the curve. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2013.804020
   Google Scholar
• Educause. (2020). 7 things you should know about the HyFlex course model. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/7/7-things-you-should-know-about-the-hyflex-course-model
   Google Scholar
• Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. S. (2011). The case for partnering doctoral students with librarians: a synthesis of the literatures. Library Review, 60(7), 599–620. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111153614
   Google Scholar
• Jaguszewski, J. M., Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times. Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. https://www.arl.org/publications-resources/2893-new-roles-for-new-times-transforming-liaison-roles-in-research-libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1998). Perfectionism and library anxiety among graduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(98)90073-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(98)90073-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2015). Factors affecting undergraduates' selection of online library resources in academic tasks: Usefulness, ease-of-use, resource quality, and individual differences. Library Hi Tech, 33(2), 272–291. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.utah.edu/10.1108/LHT-01-2015-0008 https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2015-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<361::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-#
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C., Heinström, J., & Todd, R. J. (2008, December). The ‘information search process’ revisited: Is the model still useful? Information Research, 13(4). http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.). Improving student learning: Diversity and inclusivity: Proceedings of the 2004 12th international symposium. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, P. A., King, K. P. (2000). Planning for effective faculty development: Using adult learning strategies. Krieger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 1 – Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning – ten years (pp. 412–424). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In Overcoming barriers to student understanding (pp. 43–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe-Gulick, A., & Petr, J. (2012). Incoming graduate students in the social sciences: How much do they really know about library research? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, G. M. (2011). Just‐in‐time teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.469
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2000). I’ll go to the library later: The relationship between academic procrastination and library anxiety. College & Research Libraries, 61(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel, H. G. (2010). Graduate student space and service needs: A review of academic web sites. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903492983
   Google Scholar
• Rempel, H. G., Hussong-Christian, U., & Mellinger, M. (2011). Graduate student space and service needs: A recommendation for a cross-campus solution. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfro, C., & Stiles, C. (Eds.) (2018). Transforming libraries to serve graduate students. Association of College and Research Libraries, A division of the American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, N. K. (1984). Counseling adults in transition. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, N. K., Waters, E. B., & Goodman, J. (1995). Counseling adults in transition (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, G. E. (2009). Libraries and graduate students: Building connections. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, R., Allum, J., & Okahana, H. (2015). Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion. Council of Graduate Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis, 5, 153–169.
   Google Scholar