U.S. Church Leaders’ Responses to the Charleston Church Shooting: An Examination Based on Speech Act Theory

References

• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. (2015, June 19). “I forgive you.” Relatives of Charleston church shooting victims address Dylan Roof. The Washington Post (p. A1).
   Google Scholar
• Brockington, A. (2017, June 17). Charleston church shooting victims to be honored with new memorial. NBC News.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. L., & Phillip, A. (2015, June 21). After tragic shooting, Charleston church reopens with prayer, songs and tears. The Washington Post (p. A1).
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11(6), 461–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapple, R. L., Jacinto, G. A., Harris-Jackson, T. N., & Vance, M. (2017). Do #BlackLivesMatter? Implicit bias, institutional racism and fear of the black body. Ralph Bunche Journal of Public Affairs, 6(1), A2.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. R., & Perrault, C. R. (1979). Elements of a plan based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3(3), 177–212. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0303_1
   Google Scholar
• Combs, C. C. (2011). Terrorism in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, W. (Producer). (2015, July 2). National Public Radio, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2015). Speech acts. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2015 ed.). Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Grünberg, A. (2014). Saying and doing: Speech actions, speech acts, and related events. European Journal of Philosophy, 22(S2), 173–198. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00481.x
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, A. (2016). How God is using the murder of nine people to bring racial reconciliation to all people. The Kabod, 2(2), A3.
   Google Scholar
• Ibekwe, C. (2018). Reconciliation: Examining the Charleston AME tragedy victims’ forgiveness of Dylann Roof. In B. D. Lundy, A. G. Adebayo, & S. Hayes (Eds.), Atone: Religion, conflict, and reconciliation (pp. 153–172). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Khandkar, S. H. (2009). Open coding. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levison, J. (2016, June 18). Emanuel AME Church reminds us of religion’s intrinsic connection to politics. Huffington Post (p. A1).
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, B. D., Adebayo, A. G., & Hayes, S. (Eds.). (2018). Atone: Religion, conflict, and reconciliation (pp. 153–172). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. (2017). Dark ideas: How neo-Nazi and violent Jihadi ideologues shaped modern terrorism. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Olufowote, J., & Matusitz, J. (2016). “How dark a world it is … where mental health is poorly treated:” Mental illness frames in sermons given after the Sandy Hook shootings. Health Communication, 31(12), 1539–1547. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1089458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit, N. R. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(1), 55–62. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J., & Vandervecken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and speech acts: Volume 1, principles of language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, G., & Leib, J. (2001). Whose South is it anyway? Race and the Confederate battle flag in South Carolina. Political Geography, 20(3), 271–299. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00065-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, G., & Leib, J. (2016). Religion, murder, and the Confederate battle flag in South Carolina. Southeastern Geographer, 56(1), 28–35. doi:10.1353/sgo.2016.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulaika, J., & Douglass, W. A. (1996). Terror and taboo. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar