145
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

No Solamente Ellos Aprenden, Aprendemos Nosotros También: Latina Mothers’ Experiences with Co-Design Approaches in Creating a Math Activity for Their Children

ORCID Icon

References

  • Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
  • Arvola, M., & Linder, J. (2018). Know thy users by interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Interaction Science, 6, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24982/jois.1719018.003
  • Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind Culture and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
  • Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
  • Belgrave, A. B., Bermudez, V. N., Chew, P., Lin, Y., Ahn, J., & Bustamante, A. S. (2022). Using a participatory design approach for co-creating culturally situated STEM enrichment activities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 82, 101451–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101451
  • Bermudez, V. N., Salazar, J., Garcia, L., Ochoa, K. D., Pesch, A., Roldan, W., Soto-Lara, S., Gomez, W., Rodriguez, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Ahn, J., & Bustamante, A. S. (2023). Designing culturally situated playful environments for early STEM learning with a Latine community. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.06.003
  • Booker, A., & Goldman, S. (2016). Participatory design research as a practice for systemic repair: Doing hand-in-hand math research with families. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1179535
  • Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J., Dominguez, X., & Bell, E. R. (2012). Preschool classroom behavioral context and school readiness outcomes for low-income children: A multilevel examination of child- and classroom-level influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026301
  • Civil, M., & Bernier, E. (2006). Exploring images of parental participation in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. Mathematical Thinking & Learning: An International Journal, 8(3), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0803_6
  • Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller, Eds.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406
  • Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
  • Crosnoe, R. (2012). Family-school connections, early learning, and socioeconomic inequality in the U.S. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2012.01
  • de la Rosa, J., Ruecker, S., & Nohora, C. G. (2021). Systemic mapping and design research: Towards participatory democratic engagement. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.04.001
  • Eason, H. S., Scalise, N. R., Berkowitz, T., Ramani, B. G., & Levine, C. S. (2020). Reviewing the Family Math Literature: Recommendations for Practice, Policy, and Research. https://education-first.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FamilyMathReview_WhitePaper.pdf
  • Ferlazzo, L., & Hammond, L. A. (2009). Building parent engagement in schools. Linworth.
  • Fierros, C. O., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2016). Vamos a platicar: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies, 15(2), 98–121. https://thisbridgecalledcyberspace.net/FILES/3943.pdf
  • Fránquiz, M. E., Salazar, M. C., & DeNicolo, C. P. (2011). Challenging majoritarian tales: Portraits of bilingual teachers deconstructing deficit views of bilingual learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.625884
  • González, N. (1995). Processual approaches to multicultural education. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886395312008
  • González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
  • Hampden Thompson, G., & Galindo, C. (2017). School-family relationships, school satisfaction and the academic achievement of young people. Educational Review, 69(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1207613
  • Hanley, M., & Noblit, G. (2009). Cultural responsiveness, racial identity and academic success: A review of literature. A paper prepared for the Heinz Endowments. https://www.heinz.org/userfiles/library/culture-report_final.pdf
  • Harper, M., & Cole, P. (2012). Member checking: Can benefits be gained similar to group therapy? The Qualitative Report, 17(2), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.2139
  • Hindin, A., & Mueller, M. (2016). Creating home-school partnerships: Examining urban and suburban teachers’ practices, challenges, and educational needs. Teaching Education, 27(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2016.1208165
  • Ishimaru, A. M., Rajendran, A., Nolan, C. M., & Bang, M. (2018). Community design circles: Co-designing justice and well-being in family-community-research partnerships. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 3(2), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2018.133
  • Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. https://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/Connected_Learning_report.pdf
  • Iversen, O. S., Dindler, C., & Hansen, E. I. K. (2013). Understanding teenagers’ motivation in participatory design. International Journal of Child–Computer Interaction, 1(3–4), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.02.002
  • Khan, T., & Beltrán-Grimm, S. (2020). Re-imagining the role of families as equal partners in STEM learning. Connected Science Learning, 2(4). https://www.nsta.org/connected-science-learning/connected-science-learning-october-december-2020/re-imagining-role
  • Kiyama, J. M. (2010). College aspirations and limitations the role of educational ideologies and funds of knowledge in Mexican American families. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209357468
  • Locock, L., Robert, G., Boaz, A., Vougioukalou, S., Shuldham, C., Fielden, J., & Pearcey, J. (2014). Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient centered quality improvement: An ethnographic process evaluation of ‘accelerated’ experience based co-design. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 19(4), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614531565
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
  • Pesch, A., Ochoa, K. D., Fletcher, K. K., Bermudez, V. N., Todaro, R. D., Salazar, J., Gibbs, H. M., Ahn, J., Bustamante, A. S., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2022). Reinventing the public square and early educational settings through culturally informed, community co-design: Playful learning landscapes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 933320–933320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933320
  • Ramos, D., & Kiyama, J. M. (2021). Tying it all together: Defining the core tenets of funds of knowledge. Educational Studies, 57(4), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1904932
  • Rendón-Linares, L. I., & Muñoz, S. M. (2011). Revisiting validation theory: Theoretical foundations, applications, and extensions. Enrollment Management Journal, 5(2), 12–33. https://www.sunywcc.edu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/rendon_munoz_revisiting_validation_theory.pdf
  • Rodriguez, T. L. (2011). Stories of self, stories of practice: Enacting a vision of socially just pedagogy for Latino youth. Teaching Education, 22(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.593165
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3E [Third edition].). SAGE.
  • Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 221–259). Sage Publications.
  • Sibbet, D. (2010). Visual meetings: How graphics, sticky notes and idea mapping can transform group productivity. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
  • van der Lelie, C. (2006). The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(2–3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0026-7
  • Villenas, S. A., Godinez, F. E., Bernal, D. D., & Elenes, C. A. (2006). Chicanas/Latina building bridges. In D. D. Bernal, F. E. Godinez, C. A. Elenes, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Chicana/Latina education in everyday life: Feminista perspectives on pedagogy and epistemology (pp. 1–9). SUNY Press. http://www.sunypress.edu/pdf/61295.pdf
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Harvard University Press.
  • Westerlund, B., Lindquist, S., Mackay, W., & Sundblad, Y. (2003). Co-designing methods for designing with and for families. Proceedings for 5th European Academy of Design Conference. Barcelona. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245677639_Co-design_methods_for_designing_with_and_for_families

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.