“It Was Because I Could Speak English That I Got the Job”: Neoliberal Discourse in a Chinese English Textbook Series

References

• Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1989). The political economy of textbook publishing. In S. De Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority, and criticism: Readings on the school textbook (pp. 155–169). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres: The international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9, 723–742. doi:10.1177/1461445607082576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (2003). Pearl Harbor in Japanese high school history textbooks: The grammar and semantics of responsibility. In J. R. Martin, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value (pp. 247–271). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9–49. doi:10.1086/258724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 181–196. doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(96)00039-7
   Google Scholar
• Birch, G., & Liyanage, I. (2004). TESOL: Trojan horse of globalization. In B. Barlett, F. Bryer, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Educating: Weaving research into practice (pp. 93–102). Brisbane, Australia: School of cognition, language, and special education, Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D. (2014). Social class and applied linguistics. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Oxford, UK: Polity Press & Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, C. W. (2013). The “neoliberal citizen”: Resemiotising globalised identities in EAP Materials. In J. Gray (Ed.), Critical perspectives on language teaching materials (pp. 64–87). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, C. W. (2016). Addressing racialized multicultural discourses in an EAP textbook: Working toward a critical pedagogies approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 109–131. doi:10.1002/tesq.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Holt, N. (2005). Grounded theory. In B. Somekh, & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 49–55). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cots, J. M. (2006). Teaching ‘with an attitude:’ Critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60, 336–345. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl024
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.673025
   Google Scholar
• Davison, N. (2010). What was neoliberalism? In N. Davison, P. McCafferty, & D. Miller (Eds.), Neoliberal Scotland: Class and society in a stateless nation (pp. 1–92). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Los Heros, S. (2009). Linguistic pluralism or prescriptivism? A CDA of language ideologies in Talento, Peru’s official textbook for the first-year of high school. Linguistics and Education, 20, 172–199. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992a). The appropriacy of “appropriateness.” In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, A., & Adamson, B. (Eds.). (2015). Trilingualism in education in China: Models and challenges. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, A., & Byram, M. (2002). Authenticity in college English textbooks: An intercultural perspective. RELC Journal, 33(2), 58–84. doi:10.1177/003368820203300203
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(3), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2010a). The branding of English and the culture of the New Capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English language textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 31, 714–733. doi:10.1093/applin/amq034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2010b). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (Ed.). (2013). Critical perspectives on language teaching materials. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101–104. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holborow, M. (2015). Language and neoliberalism. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2005). English language education in China: Policies, progress, and problems. Language Policy, 4, 5–24. doi:10.1007/s10993-004-6561-7
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2009). The craze for English-medium education in China: Driving forces and looming consequences. English Today, 100(25), 47–54. doi:10.1017/s0266078409990472
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & McKay, S. L. (2014). Multilingualism as portrayed in a Chinese English textbook. In J. Conteh, & G. Meier (Eds.), The multilingual turn in languages education: Challenges and opportunities. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, L. X., & Cortazzi, M. (2002). English language teaching in China: A bridge to the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 53–64. doi:10.1080/0218879020220206
   Google Scholar
• Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2, 241–249. doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0204_1
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (1998). Ideologies of English in Japan. World Englishes, 17, 295–306. doi:10.1111/1467-971x.00105
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2011a). Learning a foreign language as leisure and consumption: Enjoyment, desire, and the business of eikaiwa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 473–488. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.573069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2011b). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22, 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Kuppens, A. H. (2009). English in advertising: Generic intertextuality in a globalizing media environment. Applied Linguistics, 31, 115–135. doi:10.1093/applin/amp014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (2011). The common European framework of reference for languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44, 381–393. doi:10.1017/s0261444811000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. B. (2005). The construction of pro-science and technology discourse in Chinese language textbooks. Language and Education, 19, 304–321. doi:10.1080/09500780508668683
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (1989). Open and closed texts: The ideological/semantic analysis of textbook narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(1), 53–80. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(89)90109-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lӓhdesmӓki, S. (2009). Intertextual heterogeneity of the Finnish EFL textbooks: Genre embedding as reconceptualization. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 37–392). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majhanovich, S. (2014). Neo-liberalism, globalization, language policy and practice issues in the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34, 168–183. doi:10.1080/02188791.2013.875650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, S. L. (2000). Teaching English as an international language: Implications for cultural materials in the classroom. TESOL Journal, 9(4), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, D. (2011). Global slump: The economics and politics of crisis and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2001). Curriculum standards for English. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Inter-semiotic expansion of experiential meaning: Hierarchical scales and metaphor in mathematics discourse. In C. Jones, & E. Ventola (Eds.), From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning (pp. 231–254). London, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. S. (2010). Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20, 22–38. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. S. (2011). The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 443–455. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.573067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. S., & Lo, A. (2012). Transnational South Korea as a site for a sociolinguistics of globalization: Markets, timescales, neoliberalism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16, 147–164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Milans, M. (2012). Beyond “safe-talk”: Institutionalization and agency in China’s English language education. Linguistics and Education, 23, 62–76. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2008). Critical discourse analysis in education. In M. Martin-Jones, A.-M. De Mejia, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Discourse and education (Vol. 3) Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 53–68). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Schaenen, I. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in literacy education: A review of the literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 121–143. doi:10.1002/rrq.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. (Ed). (2013). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Tuxworth, E. (1989). Competence based education and training: Background and origins. In J. W. Burke (Ed.), Competency based education and training (pp. 9–22). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger, C., & Kiss, T. (2013). Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 694–716. doi:10.1002/tesq.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, T. (2012). Essence or practice? Conflicting cultural values in Chinese EFL textbooks: A discourse approach. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 499–516. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.692958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, T., & Qian, Y. (2012). Ideologies of English in a Chinese high school EFL textbook: A critical discourse analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 75–92. doi:10.1080/02188791.2012.655239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, X. (2005). Ideology, textbooks, and the rhetoric of production in China. College Composition and Communication, 56, 632–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar