The State of Our Art: A Review of Theories Used in Intergenerational Program Research (2003–2014) and Ways Forward

REFERENCES

• Achenbaum, W. A. (1997). Critical gerontology. In A. Jamieson, S. Harper, & C. Victor (Eds.), Critical approaches to ageing and later life (pp. 16–26). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcock, C. L., Camic, P. M., Barker, C., Haridi, C., & Raven, R. (2011). Intergenerational practice in the community: A focused ethnographic evaluation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21(5),419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L., & McKechnie, K. (2003). Intergenerational communication: Fundamental but under-exploited theory for speech and language therapy with older people. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(1),13–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M. (2006). Keynote 1. Research, policy, practice, and theory: Interrelated dimensions of a developing field. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1),5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, A. (2003). Intergenerational learning in Stockholm County Sweden: A practical example of elderly men working in compulsory schools as a benefit for children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 7(4), 425–444.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, A. (2009). Social capital in intergenerational meetings in compulsory schools in Sweden. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 7(4), 425–441.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. L., Martin, J. A., & Mancini, J. A. (2001). Building community capacity: A manual for U.S. Air Force family support centers. Chapel Hill, NC: A Better Image Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. L., Martin, J. A., Mancini, J. A., & Nelson, J. P. (2000). Community capacity: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Community Practice, 8(2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bratianu, C., Agapie, A., Orzea, I., & Agoston, S. (2011). Inter-generational learning dynamics in universities. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Breytspraak, L. M., Arnold, L., & Hogan, K. (2008). Dimensions of an intergenerational relationship between medical students and mentors-on-aging. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(2), 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1971). Resources for social change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, E. (2007). Intergenerational interaction through reminiscence processes: A theoretical framework to explain attitude changes. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 5(1), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dipardo, A., & Schnack, P. (2004). Expanding the web of meaning: Thought and emotion in an intergenerational reading and writing program. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, S. J., & Hensley, B. H. (2004). Empowering spirituality and generativity through intergenerational connections. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 17(1), 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed: A review. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E., Erikson, J., & Kivnick, H. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, V. C., Myrick, M., & Yonge, O. (2012). A phenomenological perspective on preceptorship in the intergenerational context. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., & Giles, H. (1993). Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7(4), 423–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruhauf, C. A., Jarrott, S. E., & Lambert-Shute, J. J. (2004). Service-learners at dementia care programs: An intervention for improving contact, comfort, and attitudes. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 25(1), 37–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujiwara, Y., Sakuma, N., Ohba, H., Nishi, M., Lee, S., Watanabe, N., … Shinkai, S. (2009). REPRINTS: Effects of an intergenerational health promotion program for older adults in Japan. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 7(1), 17–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gadow, S. (1999). Relational narrative: The postmodern turn in nursing ethics. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 13(1), 57–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George, D., Whitehouse, C., & Whitehouse, P. (2011). A model of intergenerativity: How the intergenerational school is bringing the generations together to foster collective wisdom and community health. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(4), 389–404.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, C., Morris, M., Smock, S., Jarrott, S. E., & Graham, B. (2005). An intergenerational summer program involving persons with dementia and preschool children. Educational Gerontology, 31(6), 425–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Granville, G. (2002). A review of intergenerational practice in the UK. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Beth Johnson Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. (1978). Transformations: Growth and change in adult life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, S. B., & Larkin, E. (2006). Lessons from Erikson: A look at autonomy across the lifespan. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Haeger, D. L., & Lingham, T. (2013). Intergenerational collisions and leadership in the 21st century. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 11(3), 286–303.
   Google Scholar
• Havighurst, R. J. (1970). Developmental tasks and education. Edinburgh, UK: Longman Group United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. A. (1988). Measures of psychosocial development. Odessa, FL: PAR. Herrmann, D. S., Sipsas-Herrmann, A., Stafford, M., & Herrmann, N. C. (2005). Benefits and risks of intergenerational program participation by senior citizens. Educational Gerontology, 31(2), 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis.” In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Intergroup contact (pp. 1–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heydon, R. M. (2007). Making meaning together: Multi-modal literacy learning opportunities in an inter-generational art programme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(1), 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. C., & Gutheil, I. A. (2008). “They touch our hearts”: The experiences of shared site intergenerational program participants. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(4), 397–441.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrott, S. E. (2011). Where have we been and where are we going? Content analysis of evaluation research of intergenerational programs. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrott, S. E., Gigliotti, C. M., & Smock, S. A. (2006). Where do we stand? Testing the foundation of a shared site intergenerational program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrott, S. E., Morris, M. M., Burnett, A. J., Stauffer, D., Stremmel, A. S., & Gigliotti, C. M. (2011). Creating community capacity at a shared site intergenerational program: “Like a barefoot climb up a mountain”. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(4), 418–434.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrott, S. E., & Smith, C. L. (2010). The complement of research and theory in practice: Contact theory at work in nonfamilial intergenerational programs. Gerontologist, 51(1), 112–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. D., Herrick, C., & York, R. F. (2004). An intergenerational group benefits both emotionally disturbed youth and older adults. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25(8), 753–767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2011). Bet you think this song is about you: Whose narrative is it in narrative research? Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations, & Interventions, 1(1), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitwood, T., & Bredin, K. (1992). Towards a theory of dementia care: Personhood and well-being. Ageing and Society, 12(3), 269–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehne, V. (2003a). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part one. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehne, V. (2003b). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part two. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(2), 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Jacobson, A. R. (2004). Intergenerational bibliography. Retrieved from http://gu.org/
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Jacobson, A. R. (2006). Intergenerational community action and youth empowerment. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Lokon, E., Kinney, J. M., & Kunkel, S. (2012). Building bridges across age and cognitive barriers through art: College students’ reflections on an intergenerational program with elders who have dementia. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10(4), 337–354.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2005). Intergenerational interactions occurring within a shared reading program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 3(4), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, J. A., Bowen, G. L., & Martin, J. A. (2005). Community social organization: A conceptual linchpin in examining families in the context of communities. Family Relations, 54, 570–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. (2006). The redemptive self: Generativity and the stories Americans live by. Research and Human Development, 3(2&3), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, J. (2013). Promoting communication and fostering interaction between the generations: A study of the UK’s first purpose-built intergenerational centre (Unpublished PhD thesis). Keele, UK: Keele University.
   Google Scholar
• Meshel, D., & McGlynn, R. P. (2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30(6), 457–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M. (1996). Critical perspectives on ageing: New challenges for society. Ageing and Society, 16(4), 467–487.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. (2006). Research and intergenerational studies. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S., Ward, C., Smith, T., Wilson, J., & McCrea, J. (1997). Intergenerational programs: Past, present and future. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Orthner, D. K., & Bowen, G. L. (2004). Strengthening practice through results management. In A. R. Roberts & K. Corcoral (Eds.), Handbook of practice-focused research and evaluation (pp. 897–904). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterat, L., & Mayer-Smith, J. (2006). Farm friends. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(2), 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Portman, T., Bartlett, J. R., & Carlson, L. A. (2010). Relational theory and intergenerational connectedness: A qualitative study. Adultspan Journal, 9(2), 88–102.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, C. N., & Fees, B. S. (2006). Older adults’ perceptions of well-being after intergenerational experiences with youth. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(4), 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., Hummert, M. L., & Boich, L. H. (1995). Communication predicaments of aging: Patronizing behavior towards older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 144–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavior Development, 12, 35–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedsman, T. A. (2006). Keynote 2. Viewing participants as resources for one another, communities and societies: Intergenerational solidarity toward a better world. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, R. (2000). A comparison of relational psychologies: Project report no. 5. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Stone Center.
   Google Scholar
• Statham, E. (2009). Promoting intergenerational programmes: Where is the evidence to inform policy and practice? Evidence and Policy, 5(4), 471–488.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanderVen, K. (2004). Intergenerational theory in society: Building on the past, questions for the future. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(3/4), 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• VanderVen, K. (2011). The road to intergenerational theory is under construction: A continuing story. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(1), 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience. Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, ON, Canada: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. D. (1985). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar