Intergenerational learning: collaborations to develop civic literacy in young children in Irish primary school

References

• Ageing Well Network. (2012). The new agenda on ageing: To make Ireland the best country to grow old in. Dublin: Author. Online www.ageingwellnetwork.ie
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bressler, J., Henkin, N., & Adler, M. (2005). Connecting generations, strengthening communities: A toolkit for intergenerational program planners. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Center for Intergenerational Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bridger, J. C., Brennan, M. A., & Luloff, A. E. (2009). The interactional approach to community. In J. Robinson, & G. Green (Eds.), New perspectives in community development (pp. 85–100). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s Talk. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (Trans R. G. Smith, 2nd edn.). New York, NY: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Bynner, J. (2001). ‘Critical Discussion: empowerment or exclusion?’. In H. Helve, & C. Wallace (Eds.), Youth, Citizenship and Empowerment (pp. 49–56). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, B., Jastrzab, J. A., & Melchior, A. (2006). Developing indicators and measures of civic outcomes for elementary school students. East Bay Conservation Corps Charter School, Oakland, CA; The Centre for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement/CIRCLE. Working Paper No. 47 June. Retrieved from http://www.spencer-elem measure wp47 chi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P. (2011). Session VII: Lessons learnt from existing approaches to promote dialogue and understanding and enhance youth involvement. United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Dialogue and Mutual Understanding across Generations, Doha, Qatar. Retrieved from www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/docs/egm11/reportdoha2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Foróige. (2010). Foróige review 2010. Dublin, Ireland: Author. Online www.foroige.ie/printpdf/348
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M. L., & Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple perspectives. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2002). New terrain in youth development: The promise of a social justice approach. Social Justice, 29(4), 82–95. Retrieved from http://youth.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/ginwright__cammarota_2002_the_promise_of_a_social_justice_approach.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland, Department of Education and Science. (1999). Social, personal and health education: Curriculum. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland, Department of Education and Skills. (2009). Social, personal and health education in the primary school: Inspectorate evaluation studies: Promoting the quality of learning. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2: The critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmore-Cawley, M. (2015). Intergenerational learning: collaborations to activate young children’s civic engagement in Irish primary school. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Galway, Ireland: National University of Ireland Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hatton-Yeo, A. (2007). Intergenerational practice: Active participation across the generations. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: The Beth Johnson Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawy, R., & Biesta, G. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 34–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. V. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10–16. doi:10.1177/0272431604273211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2007). Why citizenship: Where, when and how children? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2), 693–718. doi:10.2202/1565-3404
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K., Springate, I., & Atkinson, M. (2010). Intergenerational practice: Outcomes and effectiveness (LGA Research Report). Slough, UK: NFER. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/IPI01
   Google Scholar
• Millei, Z., & Imre, R. (2009). The problems with using the concept ‘citizenship’ in early years policy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(3), 280–290. doi:10.2304/ciec.2009.10.3.280
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S., & Sánchez, M. (2007). Intergenerational programmes: Concept, history and models. In M. Sánchez (Ed.), Intergenerational Programs: Towards a Society for all Ages (pp. 34–63). Barcelona, Spain: “La Caixa” Foundation Social Studies Collection No. 23. doi:10.1080/15350770802466286
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S., & Smith, T. B. (1997). Developmental theories as the basis for intergenerational programs’. In S. Newman, C. R. Ward, T. B. Smith, T. B. Wilson, & J. M. McCrea (Eds.), Intergenerational programs: Past, present and future (pp. pp. 3.20). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E., & Berry, J. M. (1997). Mobilizing minority communities. Social capital and participation in urban neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 632–644. doi:10.1177/0002764297040005009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond, S., Dolan, P., & Brennan, M. (2013). Leadership: Foróige’s leadership for life programme—Evaluation report. Galway, Ireland: UNESCO Child & Family Research Centre, NUI Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, M., Butts, D. M., Hatton-Yeo, A., Henkin, N. A., Jarrott, S. E., Kaplan, M., … Weintraub, A. P. C. (2007). Intergenerational Programs: Towards a Society for all Ages.Barcelona, Spain: “La Caixa” Foundation Social Studies Collection No. 23. doi:10.1080/15350770802466286
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., Brennan, M., Chaskin, R., & Dolan, P. (2012). Youth civic engagement in non-formal education. Paper presented at IIEP Policy Forum on Engaging Youth in Planning Education for Social Transformation, 16 October 2012. Galway, Ireland: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, NUI Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2009). Who gets involved and why? The psychology of volunteerism. In E. S. C. Liu, M. J. Holosko, & T. W. Lo (Eds.), Youth empowerment and volunteerism: Principles, policies and practices (pp. 3–26). Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong Press.
   Google Scholar
• TOY. (2013). A review of the literature on intergenerational learning involving young children and older people. Leiden, Ireland: Author. Retrieved from www.toyproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Summary-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2002). Report on the second world assembly on ageing. A/CONF.197/9. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Veerman, J. W., & Van Yperen, T. A. (2007). Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care. Evaluation and Programme Planning, 30, 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2014). Writing qualitative findings paragraphs. Educational Foundations and Research, University of North Dakota. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmKuvwk8x84
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: Living theory. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R. (1989). Learning from experience. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar