Design and Evaluation of Nuclear System for ARIES-ACT2 Power Plant with DCLL Blanket

References

• ARIES Project website; http://aries.ucsd.edu/ARIES/ (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• C. KESSEL et al., “The ARIES Advanced and Conservative Tokamak Power Plant Study,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1, 1 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-794.
   Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Fusion Energy and Power: Applications, Technologies and Challenges,” Technology-Related Challenges Facing Fusion Power Plants, NOVA Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, New York (2015).
   Google Scholar
• C. KESSEL et al., “The Fusion Nuclear Science Facility, the Critical Step in the Pathway to Fusion Energy,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 68, 2, 225 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. MENARD et al., “Fusion Nuclear Science Facilities and Pilot Plants Based on the Spherical Tokamak,” Nucl. Fusion, 56, 10, 106023 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/56/10/106023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. NAJMABADI and ARIES TEAM, “Spherical Torus Concept as Power Plants—The ARIES-ST Study,” Fusion Eng. Des., 65, 2, 143 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(02)00302-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. RAFFRAY et al., “Engineering Design and Analysis of the ARIES-CS Power Plant,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 54, 725 (2008); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST08-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MALANG et al., “Development of the Lead Lithium (DCLL) Blanket Concept,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 60, 249 (2011); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST10-212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MALANG et al., “An Example Pathway to a Fusion Power Plant System Based on Lead-Lithium Breeder: Comparison of the Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium (DCLL) Blanket with the Helium-Cooled Lead-Lithium (HCLL) Concept as Initial Step,” Fusion Eng. Des., 84, 12, 2145 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.02.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. B. MORLEY et al., “Recent Research and Development for the Dual-Coolant Blanket Concept in the US,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 7–9, 920 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.04.012.
   Google Scholar
• D. MAISONNIER et al., “A Conceptual Study of Commercial Fusion Power Plants,” Final Report of the European Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Study (PPCS), EFDA-RP-RE-5.0, European Fusion Development Agreement (2005); https://www.euro-fusion.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/PPCS_overall_report_final.pdf (current as of Jan. 6, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Y. WU, “Overview of Liquid Lithium Lead Breeder Blanket Program in China,” Fusion Eng. Des., 86, 9–11, 2343 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.12.046.
   Google Scholar
• I. PALERMO et al., “Neutronic Analyses of the Preliminary Design of a DCLL Blanket for the EUROfusion DEMO Power Plant,” Fusion Eng. Des., 109–111, 13 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.065.
   Google Scholar
• B. A. PINT et al., “Material Compatibility with Isothermal Pb-Li,” Mater. High Temp., 29, 129 (2012); https://doi.org/10.3184/096034012X13334529777329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY, L. MYNSBERGE, and ARIES-ACT TEAM, “Neutronics Characteristics and Shielding System for ARIES-ACT1 Power Plant,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1, 107 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCNP X-5 MONTE CARLO TEAM, “MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5.” Volume I, “Overview and Theory,” LA-UR-03-1987, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Volume II, “User’s Guide,” LA-CP-03-0245, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Volume III, “Developer’s Guide,” LA-CP-03-0284, Los Alamos National Laboratory ( Oct. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• “DAGMC Users Guide,” University of Wisconsin–Madison Fusion Technology Institute (2008); https://trac.cae.wisc.edu/trac/svalinn/wiki/DAGMCUsersGuide (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• “CUBIT Geometry and Mesh Generation Toolkit Version 12.2,” Sandia National Laboratories (2010); http://cubit.sandia.gov (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. ALDAMA and A. TRKOV, “FENDL-2.1 Update of an Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Fusion Applications,” INDC(NDC)-467, International Atomic Agency (2004).
   Google Scholar
• M. E. SAWAN et al., “Application of CAD-Neutronics Coupling to Geometrically Complex Fusion Systems,” Proc. 23rd IEEE/NPSS Symp. Fusion Engineering (SOFE), San Diego, California, May 31–June 5, 2009, IEEE Catalog Number CFP09SOF-CDR, IEEE/Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society (2009).
   Google Scholar
• P. P. H. WILSON et al., “Acceleration Techniques for the Direct Use of CAD-Based Geometry in Fusion Neutronics,” Fusion Eng. Des., 85, 10–12, 1759 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.05.030.
   Google Scholar
• C. E. KESSEL and F. M. POLI, “Physics Basis for a Conservative Physics and Conservative Technology Tokamak Power Plant: ARIES-ACT2,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1, 220 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY, A. JABER, and S. MALANG, “State-of-the-Art 3-D Assessment of Elements Degrading the TBR of the ARIES DCLL Blanket,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 61, 321 (2012); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST11-451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY and S. MALANG, “Toward the Ultimate Goal of Tritium Self-Sufficiency: Technical Issues and Requirements Imposed on ARIES Advanced Fusion Power Plants,” Fusion Eng. Des., 84, 2072 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.12.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. BATISTONI et al., “Tritium Breeding Experiments on HCPB and HCLL Blanket Mock-Ups Irradiated with 14 MeV Neutrons,” Nucl. Fusion, 52, 8, 083014 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY and S. MALANG, “Need for Online Adjustment of Tritium Bred in Blanket and Implications for ARIES Power Plants,” UWFDM-1372, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (2009); http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1372.pdf (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY, “ARIES-ST Nuclear Analysis and Shield Design,” Fusion Eng. Des., 65, 263 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(02)00306-X.
   Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Designing ARIES-CS Compact Radial Build and Nuclear System: Neutronics, Shielding, and Activation,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 54, 3, 747 (2008); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST54-747.
   Google Scholar
• L. MORGAN and J. PASLEY, “Tritium Breeding Control Within Liquid Metal Blankets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 88, 107 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. HUBBERSTEY et al., “Is Pb-17Li Really the Eutectic Alloy? A Redetermination of the Lead-Rich Section of the Pb-Li Phase Diagram (0.0 < XLi(at%) < 22.1),” J. Nucl. Mater., 191–194, 283 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(09)80051-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. R. WANG et al., “ARIES-ACT2 DCLL Power Core Design and Engineering,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1, 193 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. H. TOUDESHKI et al., “Vacuum Vessel Analysis and Design for the ARIES-ACT1 Fusion Power Plant,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 3, 675 (2013); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST12-550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Design Challenges and Activation Concerns for ARIES Vacuum Vessel,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 449 (2013); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST64-449.
   Google Scholar
• C. MARTIN and L. EL-GUEBALY, “ARIES-ACT1 Loss of Coolant/Flow Accident Thermal Analysis,” UWFDM-1416, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (2013); http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1416.pdf (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Activation and Environmental Aspects of ARIES-ACT1 Power Plant,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1, 179 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-819.
   Google Scholar
• R. E. ALCOUFFE et al., “PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System,” LA-UR-05-3925, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2005).
   Google Scholar
• R. KLUEH et al., “Impurity Effects on Reduced-Activation Ferritic Steels Developed for Fusion Applications,” J. Nucl. Mater., 280, 353 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00060-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. R. ODETTE and D. T. HOELZER, “Irradiation-Tolerant Nanostructures Ferritic Alloys: Transforming Helium from a Liability to an Asset,” JOM, 62, 9, 84 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0144-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY and M. ZUCCHETTI, “Progress and Challenges of Handling Fusion Radioactive Materials,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 68, 3, 484 (2015); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITER Project website; http://www.iter.org/ ( current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• ESBWR Design website; https://nuclear.gepower.com/build-a-plant/products/nuclear-power-plants-overview/esbwr.html (current as of Jan. 6, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• B. A. PINT et al., “Development of ODS FeCrAl for Compatibility in Fusion and Fission Applications,” JOM 66, 2458 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1200-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. A. UNOCIC et al., “The Microstructure and Environmental Resistance of Low-Cr ODS FeCrAl,” Mater. High Temp., 32, 123 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1179/0960340914Z.00000000088.
   Google Scholar
• A. KIMURA et al., “Development of Al Added High-Cr ODS Steels for Fuel Cladding of Next Generation Nuclear Systems,” J. Nucl. Mater., 417, 176 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. DOU et al., “TEM and HRTEM Study of Oxide Particles in an Al-Alloyed High-Cr Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Steel with Zr Addition,” J. Nucl. Mater., 444, 441 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. A. UNOCIC and B. A. PINT, “Alloying and Coating Strategies for Improved Pb-Li Compatibility,” J. Nucl. Mater., 455, 330 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.058.
   Google Scholar
• P. WILSON and D. HENDERSON, “ALARA: Analytic and Laplacian Adaptive Radioactivity Analysis: A Complete Package for Analysis of Induced Activation,” Volume I, UWFDM-1070, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute. Volume II, UWFDM-1071, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (1998).
   Google Scholar
• FENDL3 Activation Library website; https://www-nds.iaea.org/fendl3/000pages/StarterLib/2011-12-01/ (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. ZUCCHETTI et al., “The Feasibility of Recycling and Clearance of Active Materials from a Fusion Power Plant,” J. Nucl. Mater., 367–370, 1355 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY and L. CADWALLADER, “Radioactive Waste: Sources, Management and Health Risks,” Perspectives of Managing Fusion Radioactive Materials: Technical Challenges, Environmental Impact, and US Policy, S. FENTON, Ed., NOVA Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, New York (2014); https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=51057 (current as of Apr. 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, “Energy,” Part 61, “Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” Sec. 55, “Waste Classification,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2014).
   Google Scholar
• S. FETTER et al., “Long Term Radioactive Waste from Fusion Reactors: Part II,” Fusion Eng. Des., 13, 239 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(90)90104-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar