Numerical Simulation of Airflow and Dust Migration in Vacuum Vessel During Loss of Vacuum Accident for Updated CFETR

References

• Y. X. WAN et al., “Overview of the Present Progress and Activities on the CFETR, ” Nucl. Fusion, 57, 10, 102009 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa686a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ZHUANG et al., “Progress of the CFETR Design,” Nucl. Fusion, 59, 11, 112010 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab0e27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Z. LEI et al., “Interface Design of the Blanket System for CFETR,” Nucl. Fusion, 60, 12, 126020 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abb1f7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITER Preliminary Safety Report (RPrS), ITER IDM Doc, ITER-3ZR2NC (2011).
   Google Scholar
• T. GELAIN et al., “CFD Modelling of Particle Resuspension in a Toroidal Geometry Resulting from Airflows During a Loss of Vacuum Accident (LOVA),” Fusion Eng. Des., 151, 111386 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. LIU et al., “Tolerance Analysis Based on 3D Models for In-Wall Shielding of ITER Vacuum Vessel,” J. Fusion Energy, 34, 4, 785 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9882-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. LIU et al., “Simulation and Experimental Study of Forming Technology on First Wall Mock-Up for Fusion Reactor Blanket,” J. Fusion Energy, 34, 3, 608 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9849-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. SOBRIDO et al., “Oxidative Transformation of Tungsten (W) Nanoparticles Potentially Released in Aqueous and Biological Media in Case of Tokamak (Nuclear Fusion) Lost of Vacuum Accident (LOVA),” Comptes Rendus Géosci., 352, 8, 539 (2020); https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. DENKEVITS, “Explosibility of Hydrogen–Graphite Dust Hybrid Mixtures,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 20, 4–6, 698 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. BELLECCI et al., “STARDUST Experimental Campaign and Numerical Simulations: Influence of Obstacles and Temperature on Dust Resuspension in a Vacuum Vessel Under LOVA,” Nucl. Fusion, 51, 5, 053017 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. CIPARISSE et al., “First 3D Numerical Simulations Validated with Experimental Measurements During a LOVA Reproduction Inside the New Facility STARDUST-Upgrade,” Fusion Eng. Des., 101, 204 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. POGGI et al., “First Experimental Campaign to Demonstrate STARDUST-Upgrade Facility Diagnostics Capability to Investigate LOVA Conditions,” J. Fusion Energy, 34, 6, 1320 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9964-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. BELLECCI et al., “Characterization of Divertor Influence in Case of LOVA: CFD Analysis of Stardust Experimental Facility,” Proc. 36th European Physical Society Conf. Plasma Physics 2009 (EPS 2009), Sofia, Bulgaria, June 29–July 3, 2009, Vol. 33, p. 266 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• C. BELLECCI et al., “Loss of Vacuum Accident (LOVA): Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Flow Velocities Against Experimental Data for the Model Validation,” Fusion Eng. Des., 86, 4–5, 330 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.02.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. LUPELLI, “Numerical Study of Air Jet Flow Field During a Loss of Vacuum,” Fusion Eng. Des., 89, 9–10, 2048 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. KUZNETSOV et al., “Experiments for the Hydrogen Combustion Aspects of ITER LOVA Scenarios,” Fusion Eng. Des., 86, 9–11, 2747 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. GELAIN et al., “CFD Modelling of the Wall Friction Velocity Field in the ITER Tokamak Resulting from Airflow During a Loss of Vacuum Accident—Consequences for Particle Resuspension,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 87 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.04.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. L. FRANO et al., “Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Loss of Vacuum Accident of ITER Cryostat,” Fusion Eng. Des., 109–111, 1302 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. PACI et al., “Bases for Dust Mobilization Modelling in the Light of STARDUST Experiments,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 235, 10–12, 1129 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.01.015.
   Google Scholar
• S. PACI et al., “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Air Inflow Technique for Dust Removal from the Vacuum Vessel of a Tokamak Machine,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 1, 151 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. ROQUEMORE et al., “3D Measurements of Mobile Dust Particle Trajectories in NSTX,” J. Nucl. Mater., 90, 222 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.065.
   Google Scholar
• G. CARUSO et al., “Modelling of Dust Resuspension in Tokamak Devices During an Air Inflow Event,” J. Fusion Energy, 34, 5, 1039 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9921-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. XU et al., “Numerical Simulation of Airflow Characteristics During the Loss of Vacuum Accident of CFETR,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 24, 11160 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. XU et al., “Numerical Analysis of Loss of Vacuum Accident (LOVA) and Preliminary Discussion About Dust Resuspension for CFETR,” Fusion Eng. Des., 143, 82 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar