An Introduction to and Translation of Chaïm Perelman’s 1933 De l’arbitraire dans laconnaissance [On the Arbitrary in Knowledge]

Works cited

• Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “Thick Translation.” The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Lawrence Venuti, Routledge, 2004, pp. 389–401.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. Metaphysics, tranlsated by W.D. Ross, Vol. 2, Clarendon P, 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse. translated by George Kennedy, Oxford U P, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, Henri. Mind-Energy. Lectures and Essays. translated by H. Wildon Carr, Greenwood P, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Bolduc, Michelle, and David A. Frank. “Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation”: Commentary and Translation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 43, 2010, pp. 308–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Stuart C., et al. Biographical Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Philosophers, Routledge Reference. Routledge, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, T.H. “Review of Perelman’s ‘De l’arbitraire dans la connaissance’.” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 36, 1934, pp. 613.
   Google Scholar
• Courot, Augustine. Essai sur les fondements de nos connaissances et sur les caractères de la critique philosophique. Tome 2, Hachette, 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Creath, Richard. “Logical Empiricism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Fall, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/logical-empiricism/
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes, edited by C. Adam, et al., Vrin, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dupréel, Eugène. “Sur les rapports de la logique et de la sociologie ou théorie des idées confuses.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 19, 1911, pp. 517–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dupréel, Eugène. “Convention et raison.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 1925, reprinted in Dupréel. Essais pluralistes. Presses Universitaires de France, 1949, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dupréel, Eugène. De la nécessité. M. Lamertin, 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Dupréel, Eugène. Esquisse d’une philosophie des valeurs. Alcan, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Emile. “Jugements de valeur et jugements de réalité.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 19, 1911, pp. 437–53.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Emile. Sociologie et philosophie. Presses Universitaires de France, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Foran, Lisa. “Introduction. What Is the Relation between Translation and Philosophy?.” Translation and Philosophy, edited by Lisa Foran, Peter Lang, 2012, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, David, and Michelle K. Bolduc. “Chaïm Perelman’s ‘First Philosophies and Regressive Philosophy’: Commentary and Translation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 36, 2003, pp. 189–204. doi:10.1353/par.2003.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Der Gedanke.” Beiträge Zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, vol. 1, 1918-19, pp. 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Gianformaggio, Laetitia. “La tolérance libérale dans la pensée de Chaïm Perelman.” Chaïm Perelman et la pensée contemporaine, edited by Guy Haarscher, Bruylant, 1993, pp. 429–450.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Alan G., and Ray D. Dearin. Chaïm Perelman. State U of New York P, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. Pragmatisme. translated by E. Le Brun, Flammarion, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. Pragmatism [1907]. Longmans, Green, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. “The Sentiment of Rationality.” Mind 1897, reprinted in, Essays on Pragmatism, edited by Alburey Castell, Hafner, 1948, pp. 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mootz, Francis J., III. “Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 43, no. 4, 2010, pp. 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. “Les Couples Philosophiques: Une Nouvelle Approche.” Revue Internationale De Philosophie, vol. 33, 1979, pp. 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, Vilfredo. Manuale di economia politica, con una introduzione alla scienza sociale. Societa Editrice Libraria, 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Esquisse d’une logistique des valeurs.” Revue de l’Université de Bruxelles, vol. 36, 1931, pp. 486–96.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “À propos de la philosophie de M. Dupréel.” Revue de l’Université de Bruxelles, vol. 27, 1932, pp. 385–99.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “De l’arbitraire dans la connaissance.” Archives de la Société belge de Philosophie, vol. 3, 1933, pp. 5–44.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “L’antinomie de M. Gödel.” Bulletins de l’Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique, vol. 6, 1936, pp. 730–36.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “La morale des forts et la morale des faibles.” Le flambeau, vol. 22, 1939a, pp. 183–92.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Etude sur Gottlob Frege (résumé de la dissertation de l’auteur).” Revue de l’Université de Bruxelles, vol. 2, 1939b, pp. 224–27.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Fragments pour la théorie de la connaissance de M. E. Dupréel.” Dialectica, vol. 4, 1947-48, pp. 354–66. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1947.tb00505.x.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Philosophies premières et philosophie régressive.” Dialectica, vol. 3, 1949, pp. 175–91. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.1949.tb00862.x.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “La méthode dialectique et le rôle de l’interlocuteur dans le dialogue.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 60, 1955, pp. 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Le Philosophe Marcel Barzin.” Le flambeau, vol. 3–4, 1961a, pp. 171–76.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “Jugements de valeur, justification et argumentation.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 15, 1961b, pp. 327–35.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “À propos d’Eugène Dupréel. Contribution à un portrait philosophique.” Revue internationale de philosophie, vol. 22, 1968, pp. 227–37.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. “L’originalité de la pensée d’Eugène Dupréel (à l’occasion du centenaire de sa naissance).” Bulletin de la classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques, vol. 69, 1979a, pp. 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Applications. Reidel, 1979b.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. U of Notre Dame P, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Harvard U P, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Quinton, Anthony. “Ayer’s Place in the History of Philosophy.” A.J. Ayer Memorial Essays, edited by A. Phillips Griffiths, Cambridge U P, 1991, pp. 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rée, Jonathan. “The Translation of Philosophy.” New Literary History, vol. 32, 2001, pp. 223–57. doi:10.1353/nlh.2001.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, Carlin. “Rhetorically Speaking: Chaim Perelman Rediscovers Western Philosophy.” Village Voice May 17, 1983, p. 47.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford U P, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.” 1918, reprinted in Logic and Knowledge, edited by Robert Marsh, Allen and Unwin, 1956, pp. 177–281.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, George. “The Hermeneutic Motion,” The Translation Studies Reader, edited by Lawrence Venuti, 2nd ed., Routledge, 2002, pp. 193–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tarski, Alfred. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, edited by John Corcoran, 2nd ed., Hackett, 1933, pp. 152–278.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, Christopher W. “Ways of Being Reasonable: Perelman and the Philosophers.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 43, 2010, pp. 337–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uebel, Thomas E., and Alan W. Richardson. The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge U P, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vannier, Guillaume. Argumentation et droit: une introduction à la “nouvelle rhétorique” de perelman. Presses universitaires de France, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Zyskind, Harold. “Introduction.” The New Rhetoric and the Humanities, Reidel, 1979, pp. ix–xxii.
   Google Scholar