The Value of Response Times in Item Response Modeling

REFERENCES

• Bolsinova, M., & Maris, G. (in press). A test for conditional independence between response time and accuracy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2007). An item response theory model for incorporating response time data in binary personality items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 525–543. doi:10.1177/0146621606295197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhammer, F., & Kroehne, U. (2014). Controlling individuals’ time spent on task in speeded performance measures: Experimental time limits, posterior time limits, and response time modeling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38(4), 255–267. doi:10.1177/0146621613517164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Entink, R. H., Fox, J.-P., & Van der Linden, W. J. (2009). A multivariate multilevel approach to the modeling of accuracy and speed of test takers. Psychometrika, 74, 21–48. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9075-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, J. (2001). Learning potential and anxious tendency: Test anxiety as a bias factor in educational testing. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 14(3), 337–362. doi:10.1080/10615800108248361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X.-B., Tao, J., & Chang, H.-H. (2015). A conditional joint modeling approach for locally dependent item responses and response times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52(1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/jedm.2015.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, D., Tuerlinckx, F., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2015). A bivariate generalized linear item response theory modeling framework to the analysis of responses and response times. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 56–74. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. (1979). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 305–311. doi:10.1111/bjop.1979.70.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranger, J., & Kuhn, J.-T. (2014). An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 388–407. doi:10.1111/bmsp.2014.67.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranger, J., Kuhn, J. T., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests. Psychometrika, 80, 791–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranger, J., & Ortner, T. (2012). The case of dependency of responses and response times: A modeling approach based on standard latent trait models. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(2), 128.
   Google Scholar
• Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Using children’s “ability to learn” in diagnosis and assessment. Educational & Child Psychology, 23, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Roskam, E. E. (1987). Toward a psychometric theory of intelligence. In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 151–171). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Province, J. M., Morey, R. D., Gomez, P., & Heathcote, A. (2015). The lognormal race: A cognitive-process model of choice and latency with desirable psychometric properties. Psychometrika, 80, 491–513. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9396-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider Lidz, C. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: An approach using item response testing. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 179–203). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L., Bregman, E. O., Cobb, M. V., & Woodyard, E. (1926). The measurement of intelligence. New York, NY: Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, W. J. (2007). A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72, 287–308. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1478-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, W. J., & Guo, F. (2008). Bayesian procedures for identifying aberrant response-time patterns in adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 73(3), 365–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. (2010). Statistical tests of conditional independence between responses and/or response times on test items. Psychometrika, 75(1), 120–139. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9129-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Maas, H. L., & Jansen, B. R. (2003). What response times tell of children’s behavior on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(2), 141–177. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00058-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Maas, H. L. J., Molenaar, D., Maris, G., Kievit, R. A., & Borsboom, D. (2011). Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: On the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. Psychological Review, 118, 339–356. doi:10.1037/a0022749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2006). An application of item response time: The effort‐moderated IRT model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(1), 19–38. doi:10.1111/jedm.2006.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar