Comments on Counting, Measuring, and Metrology in Hand’s Measurement: A Very Short Introduction

References

• Alagumalai, S., Durtis, D. D., & Hungi, N. (2005). Applied Rasch measurement: A book of exemplars. New York, NY: Springer-Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. B. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika, 42(1), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, E. B. (1999). Sufficient statistics in educational measurement. In G. N. Masters & J. P. Keeves (Eds.), Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment (pp. 122–125). New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1988). Sage University Paper Series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Vol. series no. 07-068: Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (2010). Sufficiency and conditional estimation of person parameters in the polytomous Rasch model. Psychometrika, 75(2), 292–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, M. (1993). Paul Ehrenfest and Jan Tinbergen: A case of limited physics transfer. In N. De Marchi (Ed.), Non-natural social science: Reflecting on the enterprise of “More Heat than Light” (pp. 131–156). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogden, H. E. (1977). The Rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement. Psychometrika, 42, 631–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard, G., Jr. (2012). Invariant measurement: Using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H. (1968). Psychologische testtheorie. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2008, March 28). Rasch, Frisch, two Fishers and the prehistory of the separability theorem. In W. P. Fisher, Jr. (Ed.), Session 67.056. Reading Rasch closely: The history and future of measurement New York, NY: American Educational Research Association, Rasch Measurement SIG. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698919
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, R. (1930). Necessary and sufficient conditions regarding the form of an index number which shall meet certain of Fisher’s tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 25, 397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse, M. E., & Wright, B. D. (1986). Setting, evaluating, and maintaining certification standards with the Rasch model. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 9(3), 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. P. (1985). Applying the Rasch model to test administration. Journal of Nursing Education, 24(8), 340–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). International vocabulary of metrology: Basic and general concepts and associated terms (3rd ed.). Sevres, France: International Bureau of Weights and Measures–BIPM. Retrieved from http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keats, J. A. (1967). Test theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 18, 217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, P. R., & Schumacher, C. F. (1984, December). The Rasch model: Its use by the National Board of Medical Examiners. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 7(4), 443–454.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon lectures in management studies). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new kind of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari, L., & Wilson, M. (2014, May). An introduction to the Rasch measurement approach for metrologists. Measurement, 51, 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (2007). Special issue: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(3), 235–335.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N., & Keeves, J. P. (Eds.). (1999). Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment. New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2002). Maxwell and “the method of physical analogy”: Model-based reasoning, generic abstraction, and conceptual change. In D. Malament (Ed.), Reading natural philosophy: Essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics (pp. 129–166). Lasalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, V. A., Conner, G. R., Grant, C. P., & Bunderson, C. V. (2009). The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(4), 348–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pendrill, L., & Fisher, W. P. Jr., (2015). Counting and quantification: Comparing psychometric and metrological perspectives on visual perceptions of number. Measurement, 71, 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests ( Reprint). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, A. J., Fisher, W. P., Jr., Stone, M. H., & Burdick, D. S. (2013, August). Causal Rasch models. Frontiers in Psychology: Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 4(536), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1984). Despair and hope for educational measurement. Contemporary Education Review, 3(1), 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1985). Additivity in psychological measurement. In E. Roskam (Ed.), Measurement and personality assessment (pp. 101–112). North Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1997). A history of social science measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(4), 33–45, 52.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement: What every educator and psychologist should know (pp. 65–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1999). Measurement essentials. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
   Google Scholar