Rethinking Traditional Methods of Survey Validation

References

• AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Arnulf, J. K., Larsen, K. R., Martinsen, Ø. L., & Bong, C. H. (2014). Predicting survey responses: How and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. PloS One, 9(9), e106361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickhard, M. H. (2001). The tragedy of operationalism. Theory and Psychology, 11(1), 35–44. doi:10.1177/0959354301111002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. doi:10.1111/cdev.2007.78.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425–440. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. Operationalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2009 edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/operationalism/
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. doi:10.3102/0013189X15584327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. L., & Van Den Wollenberg, A. L. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models: A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model. Psychometrika, 58, 417–429. doi:10.1007/BF02294649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1994). Trait theory as personality theory: Can a part be as great as the whole? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 120–122. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0502_4
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. D. (1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 2(3), 291–320. doi:10.1177/0959354392023003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, K. R. (2003). Closing methodological divides: Toward democratic educational research (Vol. 11). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, S. (2013). Understanding measurement in light of its origins. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 113. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319–342. doi:10.1111/jedm.2001.38.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Kyngdon, A. (2013). Descriptive theories of behaviour may allow for the scientific measurement of psychological attributes. Theory and Psychology, 23, 227–250. doi:10.1177/0959354312468221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1973/2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2010). Do time management, grit, and self-control relate to academic achievement independently of conscientiousness? In R.E. Hicks (Ed.), Personality and individual differences: Current directions. Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Maraun, M. D. (2012). Validity and measurement. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Issues and Perspectives, 10, 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maul, A. (2012). The validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review, 4, 394–402. doi:10.1177/1754073912445811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, A. (2013a). Method effects and the meaning of measurement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 169. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, A. (2013b). The ontology of psychological attributes. Theory and Psychology, 23, 752–769. doi:10.1177/0959354313506273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, A., Torres Irribarra, D., & Wilson, M. (2016). On the philosophical foundations of psychological measurement. Measurement, 79, 311–320. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrane, J. (2015). Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: The divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 431. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, W.A. (1939). Measurement. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilisation. New York, NY: William Morrow and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A conceptual introduction to psychometrics: Development, analysis and application of psychological and educational tests. The Hague, Netherlands: Eleven International.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1991). Psychology and methodology of response styles. In R. E. Snow & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science (pp. 161–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (2005). The logic of measurement: A realist overview Measurement. 38(4), 285–294
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383. doi:10.1111/bjop.1997.88.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (2009). Invalidity in validity. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications (pp. 135–170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 6–20. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). The relationship between the structure of interindividual and intraindividual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339–360). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (1999). Longitudinal analysis. In H. J. Ade`R & G. J. Mellenbergh (Eds.), Research methodology in the life, behavioural and social sciences (pp. 143–167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory (with commentaries). Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–178. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0502_1
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, D. (2011). Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 509–524. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaney, K. L., & Racine, T. P. (2013). What’s in a name? Psychology’s ever evasive construct. New Ideas in Psychology, 13, 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E.L. (1918). The nature, purposes, and general methods of measurements of educational products. Chapter II in G.M. Whipple (Ed.), The Seventeenth yearbook of the National Society for Study of Education. Part II. The Measurement of Educational Products.. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2004). Constructing measures: An item response theory approach. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications (pp. 65–82).Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing
   Google Scholar