Measurement: A Very Short Introduction—Rejoinder to discussion

References

• Abelson, R. P., & Tukey, J. W. (1959). Efficient conversion of non-metric information. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 226–230.
   Google Scholar
• Allerup, P. (2005). Erling B. Andersen: In memoriam. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(1), 1008. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt191d.htm
   Google Scholar
• Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2014). The wellbeing of nations: Meaning, motive, and measurement. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Allin, P., & Hand, D. J. (2016). New statistics for old? Measuring the wellbeing of the UK (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Statistics and Society, 180, 3–43. doi:10.1111/rssa.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1961). Scales and statistics: Parametric and nonparametric. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 305–316. doi:10.1037/h0042576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, D. J. (1996). The statistical approach to social measurement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis. Chichester: Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell N.R. and Jeffreys H. (1938). Symposium: Measurement and its importance for philosophy. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 17(1), 121–150.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (2014). On scales of measurement in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and beyond: Where Smitty went wrong. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 303–309. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1486-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, K. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: An example from quality of life (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 165, 233–253. doi:10.1111/rssa.2002.165.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, R. (1930). Necessary and sufficient conditions regarding the form of an index number which shall meet certain of Fisher’s tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 25, 397–406. doi:10.1080/01621459.1930.10502212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 564–567. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (1996). Statistics and the theory of measurement (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 159, 445–492. doi:10.2307/2983326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (1997). Construction and assessment of classification rules. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (1999). Measurement and the nature of science: The impact on the relationship between science and the public. In A. M. Herzberg & I. Krupka (Eds.), Statistics science and public policy, III: Science and the public trust (pp. 103–108). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (2004). Measurement theory and practice: The world through quantification. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (2008). Measurement in public policy: Hitting a moving target. In A. M. Herzberg (Eds.), Statistics, science, and public policy IX: Government, science, and politics (pp. 105–111). Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (2014). The improbability principle: Why coincidences, miracles, and rare events happen every day. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (2017). Measuring sticks—interview on the importance of measurement. British Academy Review, 29, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (in press). Statistical challenges of administrative and transaction data. To Appear in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Nicholson, R. A. (1988). The meaning of personality test scores. American Psychologist, 43, 621–626. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JCGM (2008). International Vocabulary of Metrology: Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, 3rd ed. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Sevres, France, 29. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, volume 1: Additive and polynomial representations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement, volume 3: Additive and polynomial representations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new kind of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1977). Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Niederée, R. (1994). There is more to measurement than just measurement: Measurement theory, symmetry, and substantive theorizing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 527–594. doi:10.1006/jmps.1994.1039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement theory, with applications to decision-making, utility, and the social sciences. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, D. (2011). Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 509–524. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement, Volume 2: Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thas, O. (2012). Probabilistic index models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 74, 623–671. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01020.x
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T. (1990). Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 551–567. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1986). Data analysis and behavioural science or learning to bear the quantitative man’s burden by shunning badmandments. In L. V. Jones (Eds.), The collected works of John W. Tukey. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg, G. (1991). Choosing an analysis method. Leiden, the Netherlands: DSWO Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, P. F., & Wilkinson, L. (1993). Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. The American Statistician, 47, 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. J. (1986). The discriminating power of ordinal data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 381–389.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement: What every educator and psychologist should know (pp. 65–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar