Suggestions for Rethinking Validation

References

• Andersen, E. B. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika, 42(1), 69–81. doi:10.1007/BF02293746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (in press). A law of ordinal random error: The Rasch measurement model and random error distributions of ordinal assessments. Journal of Physics Conference Series.
   Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (1978). Information and exponential families in statistical theory. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. (2006). Galileo’s instruments of credit: Telescopes, images, secrecy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization and capitalism, 15th-18th centuries. Vol. 2: The wheels of commerce (S. Reynolds, Trans.) Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, S., Pendrill, L., Barbic, S., & Fisher, W. P., Jr. (in press). Patient-centred outcome metrology for healthcare decision-making. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2012). Unmodern philosophy and modern philosophy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and opinions. New York, NY: Bonanza Books.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L. (1975). Representation by symbol systems as an extension of the concept of measurement. Kybernetes, 4(4), 215–223. doi:10.1108/eb005397
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L. (2003). Widely, strongly and weakly defined measurement. Measurement, 34(1), 39–48. (10). doi:10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L. (2005). Problems of measurement in soft systems. Measurement, 38(4), 267–274. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L. (2009). Widely-defined measurement—an analysis of challenges. Measurement, 42(9), 1270–1277. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2008). Notes on IMEKO symposium. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22(1), 1147.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2010a). Rasch, Maxwell’s method of analogy, and the Chicago tradition. In G. Cooper ( Chair), Probabilistic models for measurement: Celebrating 50 years of Rasch’s Probabilistic Models. Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen School of Business. Retrieved from https://conference.cbs.dk/index.php/rasch/Rasch2010/paper/view/824
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2010b). The standard model in the history of the natural sciences, econometrics, and the social sciences. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 238(1), 012016. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/238/1/012016
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr. (in press). A practical approach to modeling complex adaptive flows in psychology and social science. Procedia Computer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Cavanagh, R. (2016). Measurement as a medium for communication and social action, I & II. In Q. Zhang & H. H. Yang (Eds.), Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2015 Conference Proceedings (pp. 153–182). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Stenner, A. J. (2011). A technology roadmap for intangible assets metrology. Paper presented at the IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13 Joint Symposium, Jena, Germany, August 31 to September 2. Retrieved from http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-24493/ilm1-2011imeko-018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Stenner, A. J. (2016). Theory-based metrological traceability in education: A reading measurement network. Measurement, 92, 489–496. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Stenner, A. J. (in press). Ecologizing vs. modernizing in measurement and metrology. Journal of Physics Conference Series
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(4), 827–833. doi:10.1177/001316447703700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankins, T. L., & Silverman, R. J. (1999). Instruments and the imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164. doi:10.1177/014662168500900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530. ( Rpt. in F. A. Hayek, (1948). Individualism and economic order (pp. 77–91). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbron, J. L. (1993). Weighing imponderables and other quantitative science around 1800. Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences, 24(1), 1–337.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, T. H. (1862). On our knowledge of the causes of the phenomena of organic nature. London, UK: Robert Hardwicke.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ihde (1983). The historical and ontological priority of technology over science. In Existential technics (pp. 25–46). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1995). Cogito ergo sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck: Review of Hutchins’ Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 3(192), 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence (C. Porter, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mari, L., Maul, A., Irribarra, D. T., & Wilson, M. (2016). Quantities, quantification, and the necessary and sufficient conditions for measurement. Measurement, 100, 115–121. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari, L., & Wilson, M. (2014). An introduction to the Rasch measurement approach for metrologists. Measurement, 51, 315–327. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2014.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markward, N. J. (2004). Establishing mathematical laws of genomic variation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markward, N. J., & Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2004). Calibrating the genome. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(2), 129–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (2007). Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 32(7–8), 701–734. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, N. E. (1955). Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. American Journal of Human Genetics, 7, 277–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2002). Maxwell and “the method of physical analogy.” In D. Malament (Ed.), Reading natural philosophy (pp. 129–166). Lasalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Pendrill, L. (2014). Man as a measurement instrument. NCSLi Measure, 9(4), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pendrill, L., & Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2015). Counting and quantification: Comparing psychometric and metrological perspectives on visual perceptions of number. Measurement, 71, 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. de S. (1986). Of sealing wax and string. In Little science, big science–and beyond (pp. 237–253). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (pp. ix-xix, 185–199). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut. (Reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B. D. Wright, 1980, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1967). Conclusion: The symbol gives rise to thought. In R. N. Anshen (Ed.), The symbolism of evil (pp. 347–357). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. H., & Stenner, A. J. (2014). From ordinality to quantity. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 27(4), 1439–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2001). Monte Carlo methods on genetic structures. In O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox, & C. Klüppelberg (Eds.), Complex stochastic systems (pp. 175–218). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A. F. C. (1972). Rockdale: The growth of an American village in the early industrial revolution. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1980). Foreword, Afterword. In G. Rasch, Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (pp. ix–xix, 185–199). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar