Using Response Times to Assess Learning Progress: A Joint Model for Responses and Response Times

References

• Chen, Y, Culpepper, S. A, Wang, S, & Douglas, J. (2018). A hidden markov model for learning trajectories in cognitive diagnosis with application to spatial rotation skills. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(1), 5–23. doi:10.1177/0146621617721250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe, E. M., Kern, J. L., & Chang, H.H. (2017). Optimizing the use of response times for item selection in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. doi: 1076998617723642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z., Wang, C., Chang, -H.-H., & Douglas, J. (2012). Utilizing response time distributions for item selection in cat. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(5), 655–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.-P., & Marianti, S. (2016). Joint modeling of ability and differential speed using responses and response times. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(4), 540–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–511.
   Google Scholar
• Glas, C. A., & Linden, W. J. (2010). Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 603–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvozdenko, E., & Chambers, D. (2007). Beyond test accuracy: Benefits of measuring response time in computerised testing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 542–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz, S., & Roussos, L. (2008). The fusion model for skills diagnosis: Blending theory with practicality. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(2), i–57.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74(2), 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, Y, & Leite, W. L. (2017). Assessing change in latent skills across time with longitudinal cognitive diagnosis modeling: An evaluation of model performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(3), 369–388. doi:10.1177/0013164416659314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Entink, R. H., Kuhn, J.-T., Hornke, L. F., & Fox, J.-P. (2009). Evaluating cognitive theory: A joint modeling approach using responses and response times. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., Cohen, A., Bottge, B., & Templin, J. (2016). A latent transition analysis model for assessing change in cognitive skills. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(2), 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnipke, D. L., & Scrams, D. J. (1997). Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34(3), 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J. (2006). A lognormal model for response times on test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(2), 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J. (2007). A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72(3), 287–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Predictive control of speededness in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J., Breithaupt, K., Chuah, S. C., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Detecting differential speededness in multistage testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(2), 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J., Klein Entink, R. H., & Fox, J.-P. (2010). Irt parameter estimation with response times as collateral information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(5), 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp, B. P., Avetisyan, M., Weissman, A., & Fox, J.-P. (2017). Stochastic programming for individualized test assembly with mixture response time models. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 693–702. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(2), 287–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Xu, G., & Shang, Z. (2016). A two-stage approach to differentiating normal and aberrant behavior in computer based testing. Psychometrika, 83(1), 223–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Yang, Y., Culpepper, S. A., & Douglas, J. A. (2017). Tracking skill acquisition with cognitive diagnosis models: A higher-order, hidden markov model with covariates. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 43(1), 57–87.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, P., Jiao, H., & Liao, D. (2017). Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar