An Application of Multidimensional Vertical Scaling

References

• Ackerman, T. A. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(1), 67–91. doi:10.1111/jedm.1992.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19, 933–958. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). Multiple group IRT. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 433–448). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Budescu, D. (1985). Efficiency of linear equating as a function of the length of the anchor test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(1), 13–20. doi:10.1111/jedm.1985.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 307–335. doi:10.3102/1076998609353115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2017). flexMIRT® version 3.51: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P. (2012). Natural language processing methods for supporting vocabulary analysis. In J. P. Sabatini, E. R. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Reaching an understanding: Innovations in how we view reading assessment (pp. 117–144). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Carlisle, J. F. (2011). The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 199–228). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Haberman, S. J. (2008). When can subscores have value? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 204–229. doi:10.3102/1076998607302636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman, S. J., & Sinharay, S. (2010). Reporting of subscores using multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika, 75(2), 209–227. doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. J., & Hanson, B. A. (1991). Methods of examining the usefulness of subscores. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kupermintz, H., Ennis, M. M., Hamilton, L. S., Talbert, J. E., & Snow, R. E. (1995). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments: I. NELS:88 mathematics achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 525–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupermintz, H., & Snow, R. E. (1997). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments: III. NELS:88 mathematics achievement to 12th grade. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 124–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unpublished doctoral dissertation; Martineau, J. A. (2004). The effects of construct shift on growth and accountability models. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. doi:10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume iii (pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellet, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Adlof, S. M. (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In J. P. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Puhan, G., Sinharay, S., Haberman, S. J., & Larkin, K. (2008). Comparison of subscores based on classical test theory methods (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-08-54). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. D. (1985). The difficulty of items that measure more than one ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(4), 401–412. doi:10.1177/014662168500900409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The context enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., & O’Reilly, T. (2013). Rationale for a new generation of reading comprehension assessments. In B. Miller, L. Cutting, & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral neurobiological, and genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 100–111). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J. P., Bruce, K., Steinberg, J., & Weeks, J. P. (2015). SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design (2nd ed.). ETS research report (ets rr-15-32). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Sinharay, S. (2010). How often do subscores have added value? Results from operational and simulated data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(2), 150–174. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1745-3984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinharay, S., & Haberman, S. J. (2008). Reporting subscores: A survey (ETS Research Memorandum No. RM-08-18). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32. doi:10.1080/10888430709336632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Davier, M. (2015). mdltm: Software for the general diagnostic model and for estimating mixtures of multidimensional discrete latent traits models [Computer software]. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. M. (1986). Fitting a unidimensional model to multidimensional item response data: The effects of latent space misspecification on the application of IRT. Paper Presented at the Office of Naval Research Contractors Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. P. (2013). Linking error in multidimensional vertical scaling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. P. (2015). Multidimensional test linking. In S. Reise & D. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. P., & Sabatini, J. P. (April, 2017). Identifying profiles of reading performance based on component measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, W. M. (1986). The choice of scale for educational measurement: An IRT perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 299–325. doi:10.1111/jedm.1986.23.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar