flexMIRT: A Flexible Modeling Package for Multidimensional Item Response Models

References

• Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573. doi:10.1007/BF02293814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459. doi:10.1007/BF02293801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, 64, 153–168. doi:10.1007/BF02294533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010a). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75, 33–57. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9136-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010b). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 307–335. doi:10.3102/1076998609353115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2017). flexMIRT®: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring. (version 3.51) [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Chung, S., & Lee, T. (2019). Tucker-Lewis index for item response theory modeling. Manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L., & Hansen, M. (2013). Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 245–276. doi:10.1111/bmsp.2013.66.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Maydeu-Olivares, A., Coffman, D. L., & Thissen, D. (2006). Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2p tables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 173–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, S. A., Heiser, C. A., Hoeve, K. B., Ozberk, E. H., Patton, E. A., Sessoms, J. C., … Wood, C. (2018). Software review of flexMIRT Version 3.5. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 240–255. doi:10.1177/0146621617726792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289. doi:10.3102/10769986022003265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. C., Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2018). A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Psychological Methods, 23, 138–149. doi:10.1037/met0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D., & Cai, L. (2018). Dimensionality analysis. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory: Applications (pp. 47–65). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. (1992). Full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423–436. doi:10.1007/BF02295430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K. T., & Paek, I. (2014). A review of commercial software packages for multidimensional IRT modeling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 486–498. doi:10.1177/0146621614536770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2008). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74, 191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2016). flexMIRT® user’s manual version 3.5: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, A. F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., Cai, L., & Hernandez, A. (2011). Comparing the fit of IRT and factor analysis models. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 333–356. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.581993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2005). Limited and full information estimation and testing in 2n contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1009–1020. doi:10.1198/016214504000002069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2014). Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 305–328. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.911075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, S., & Cai, L. (2015). Evaluating structural equation models for categorical outcomes: A new test statistic and a practical challenge of interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 569–583. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176. doi:10.1177/014662169201600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50–64. doi:10.1177/01466216000241003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2001). Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Statistical Science, 16, 351–367. doi:10.1214/ss/1015346320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric monograph No. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Cai, L., & Bock, R. D. (2010). The nominal categories item response model. In M. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models: Developments and applications (pp. 43–75). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar