References
- Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
- Bradshaw, L., Izsák, A., Templin, J., & Jacobson, E. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understandings of rational numbers: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33, 2–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.2014.33.issue-1
- Cai, L. (2017). flexMIRT version 3.51: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
- de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
- de la Torre, J., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Evaluating the Wald test for item-level comparison of saturated and reduced models in cognitive diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 355–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12022
- George, A. C., & Robitzsch, A. (2015). Cognitive diagnosis models in R: A didactic. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11, 189–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.11.3.p189
- Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y. (2008). Defining characteristics of diagnostic classification models and the problem of retrofitting in cognitive diagnostic assessment. Measurement, 6, 263–275.
- Haertel, E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 301–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00336.x
- Hansen, M., Cai, L., Monroe, S., & Li, Z. (2016). Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 69, 225–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.2016.69.issue-3
- Hartz, S. M. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana, Champaign, IL.
- Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74, 191–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9089-5
- Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2016). Flexmirt user's manual version 3.5: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software manual]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
- Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210122032064
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lee, Y.-S., de la Torre, J., & Park, Y. S. (2012). Relationships between cognitive diagnosis, CTT, and IRT indices: An empirical investigation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 333–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9196-3
- Lee, Y.-S., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. A. (2019). How to conduct a study with diagnostic models. In M. von Davier & Y.-S. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of diagnostic classification models (pp. 525–545). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05584-4_25
- Liu, Y., Tian, W., & Xin, T. (2016). An application of M2 statistic to evaluate the fit of cognitive diagnostic models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41, 3–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615621293
- Ma, W., & de la Torre, J. (2019). GDINA: The generalized DINA model framework [Computer software version 2.3.2]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GDINA
- Ma, W., Iaconangelo, C., & de la Torre, J. (2016). Model similarity, model selection, and attribute classification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40, 200–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621615621717
- Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294535
- Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 11, 71–101.
- Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
- Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
- Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of diagnostic classification model examinee estimates. Journal of Classification, 30(2), 251–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-013-9129-4
- Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2014). Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: A family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies. Psychometrika, 79, 317–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9362-0
- Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11, 287–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287
- Templin, J. L., Henson, R. A., Rupp, A. A., Jang, E., & Ahmed, M. (2008, March). Cognitive diagnosis models for nominal response data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
- Tjoe, H., & de la Torre, J. (2014). The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes: An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 237–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7
- U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved from: https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
- von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 287–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007x193957
- von Davier, M. (2014). The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 49–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12003
- von Davier, M., & Haberman, S. J. (2014). Hierarchical diagnostic classification models morphing into unidimensional ‘diagnostic’ classification models—A commentary. Psychometrika, 79, 340–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9363-z
- von Davier, M., & Lee, Y. S. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of diagnostic classification models. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.