Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume Two: Statistical Tools

References

• Albert, J. H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986017003251
   Google Scholar
• Albert, J. H., & Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(422), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafumi, J., & Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in Congress. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. A. (2007). Comparable preference estimates across time and institutions for the court, Congress, and presidency. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00260.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica, A. (2018). Inferring roll-call scores from campaign contributions using supervised learning. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. D., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of legislative roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. ([1964] 2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., & Frühwirth, R. (2007). Auxiliary mixture sampling with applications to logistic models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(7), 3509–3528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, S., & Blei, D. M. (2011). Predicting legislative roll calls from text. In L. Getoor & T. Scheffer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (pp. 489–496). http://www.icml-2011.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. (2008). Is partial-dimension convergence a problem for inferences from MCMC algorithms? Political Analysis, 16(2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, R., Broderick, T., & Jordan, M. I. (2018). Covariances, robustness, and variational Bayes. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(1), 1981–2029. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3291125.3309613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman, S. J., & Sinharay, S. (2013). Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions. Psychometrika, 78(3), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9305-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. C., & Held, L. (2006). Bayesian auxiliary variable models for binary and multinomial regression. Bayesian Analysis, 1(1), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1214/06-BA105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Lo, J., & Olmsted, J. (2016). Fast estimation of ideal points with massive data. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 631–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541600037X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessee, S. (2016). (How) can we estimate the ideology of citizens and political elites on the same scale? American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 1108–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessee, S. A. (2009). Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 103(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540909008X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, T., & Cohen, A. S. (2007). IRT model selection methods for dichotomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(4), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621606292213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, T., Cohen, A. S., & Sung, H.-J. (2009). Model selection indices for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(7), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608327800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, I. S., Londregan, J., & Ratkovic, M. (2018). Estimating spatial preferences from votes and text. Political Analysis, 26(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauderdale, B. E., & Herzog, A. (2016). Measuring political positions from legislative speech. Political Analysis, 24(3), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., & Mislevy, R. J. (2016). Bayesian psychometric modeling. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., Cohen, A. S., Kim, S.-H., & Choo, S.-J. (2009). Model selection methods for mixture dichotomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(5), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608326422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., & Wingersky, M. S. (1984). Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score equations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis, 10(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.2.134
   Google Scholar
• Ogasawara, H. (2017). Identified and unidentified cases of the fixed-effects 3- and 4-parameter models in item response theory. Behaviormetrika, 44(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-017-0032-x
   Google Scholar
• Ogasawara, H. (2020). On an unidentified fixed-effects three-parameter logistic model. Japanese Psychological Research, 62(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12261
   Google Scholar
• Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-T., Krussell, J., & Miri, F. (2018). The V-DEM measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. V-DEM Working Paper, Number 21.
   Google Scholar
• Peress, M. (2012). Identification of a semiparametric item response model. Psychometrika, 77(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9253-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 228–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martìn, E., Gonzàlez, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2015). On the unidentifiability of the fixed-effects 3PL model. Psychometrika, 80(2), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9404-2
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, D., Traber, D. & Benoit, K. (2017). Estimating intra-party preferences: Comparing speeches to votes. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinharay, S. (2003). Bayesian item fit analysis for dichotomous item response theory models. Technical report ETS Research Report Series, ETS RR–03–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sinharay, S. (2006). Model diagnostics for Bayesian networks. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treier, S. (2020). Bayesian ideal point estimation. In L. Curini & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (Vol. 2, pp. 910–936). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanHoudnos, N. M. (2012). Online supplement to Markov Chain Monte Carlo for item response models. Technical report, Department of Statistics. Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Kingston, N. (2020). Using Bayesian nonparametric item response function estimation to check parametric model fit. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44(5), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621620909906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. (2016). A note on the identifiability of fixed-effect 3PL models. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9519-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Z., Hillygus, S., & Carin, L. (2017). Evaluating U.S. electoral representation with a joint statistical model of congressional roll-calls, legislative text, and voter registration data. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1205–1214). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098151
   Google Scholar