REFERENCES
- Beckendorf, A. (2007). Interlibrary loan staffing in liberal arts college libraries. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery, & Electronic Reserve, 17(4), 15–32.
- Connell, R.S., & Janke, K.L. (2006). Turnaround time between ILLiad's Odyssey and Ariel delivery methods. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery, & Electronic Reserve, 16(3), 41–56.
- Davies, J.E. (1998). Strategic issues in managing information and document supply in academic libraries. Library Management, 19(5), 318–326.
- Deardorff, T., & Nance, H. (2009). WorldCat Local implementation: The impact on interlibrary loan. Interlending & Document Supply, 37(4), 177–180.
- Dowell, C.V., & LaGuardia, C. (1991). The structure of resource sharing in academic research libraries. RQ, 30(3), 370–376.
- Gaffney, M. (2012). Interlibrary loan requests for locally available materials: WorldCat Local's impact. College & Research Libraries, 73(1), 68–77.
- Harris, C.S. (2010). Matrix management in practice in Access Services at the North Carolina State University Libraries. Journal of Access Services, 7(4), 203–211.
- Kirchner, T. (2007). Applying organization theory to the interlibrary loan and document delivery department. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery, & Electronic Reserve, 17(4), 77–86.
- Phillips, L.L., Dulniak, N., Houck, T., & Ponnappa, B.P. (1999). Interlibrary loan turnaround time: Measuring the component parts. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 9(3), 97–119.
- Sellen, M. (1999). Turnaround time and journal article delivery: A study of four delivery systems. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 9(4), 65–72.
- UTC Office of Planning, Evaluation & Institutional Research. (2013). 2013–14 UTC Factbook: UTC Employees by EEO category [Data file]. . Retrieved from http://www.utc.edu/planning-evaluation-institutional-research/pdfs/factbook/total-employees-by-eeo-03-12.pdf