Effects of Extremely Low-Frequency-Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Different-Derived Osteoblast-Like Cells

References

• Bassett C. A. Pulsing electromagnetic fields: a new method to modify cell behavior in calcified and noncalcified tissues. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1982; 34: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett C. A. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J. Cell. Biochem. 1993; 51: 387–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton C. T., Hozack W. J., et al. Fracture healing in the rabbit fibula when subjected to various capacitively coupled electrical fields. J. Orthop. Res. 1985; 3: 331–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton C. T., Tadduni G. T., Pollack S. R. Treatment of sciatic denervation disuse osteoporosis in the rat tibia with capacitively coupled electrical stimulation. Dose response and duty cycle. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Amer. 1985; 67(7)1022–1028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzza E. P., Shibli J. A., et al. Effects of electromagnetic field on bone healing around commercially pure titanium surface: histologic and mechanical study in rabbits. Implant Dent. 2003; 12(2)182–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzza E. P., Shibli J. A., et al. Dynamic changes in traction forces with DC electric field in osteoblast-like cells. J. Cell Sci. 2004; 117(Pt 13)2721–2729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang W. H. S., Chen L. T., et al. Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25: 457–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohly H. H., Abraham G. E., 3rd, et al. Effect of static electromagnetic fields on characteristics of MG-63 osteoblasts grown in culture. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2003; 39: 454–459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtze1 S., Dembo M., et al. Dynamic changes in traction forces with DC electric field in osteoblast-like cells. J. Cell Sci. 2004; 117(13)2721–2729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mattei M., Caruso A., et al. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell line and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 1999; 20: 177–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz P., Shomura K., et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue-like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 2002; 23(5)398–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons R. J., Ryaby J. T., et al. Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1994; 55(5)376–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi R. T., Lyer B. S. Relationship between the collagen synthesis and expression of the osteoblast phenotype in MC3T3-E1. J. Bone Min. Res. 1992; 7: 235–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenberg Z. B., Brighton C. T. Bioelectric potentials in bone. J. Bone and Joint. Surg. 1966; 48(A)915–923
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukada E., Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 1957; 12: 1158–1162
   Google Scholar
• Grace K. L. R., Revell W. J., Brookes M. The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove. Orthopology 1998; 21: 297–302
   Google Scholar
• Hartig M., Joos U., Wiesmann H. P. Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increased bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur. Biophys. J. 2000; 29: 499–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibiwoye M. O., Powell K. A., et al. Bone mass is preserved in a critical-sized osteotomy by low energy pulsed electromagnetic fields as quantitated by in vivo micro-computed tomography. J. Orthop. Res. 2004; 22(5)1086–1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschvink J. L. Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagetic experiments. Bioelectromagnetics 1992; 13(5)401–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotani H., Kawaguchi H., et al. Strong static magnetic field stimulates bone formation to a definite orientation in vitro and in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002; 17(10)1814–1821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange S., Viergutz T., Simko M. Modifications in cell cycle kinetics and in expression of G1 phase-regulating proteins in human amniotic cells after exposure to electromagnetic fields and ionzing radiation. Cell Proliferation 2004; 37: 337–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. H., Mcleod K. J. Morphologic responses of osteoblast-like cells in monolayer culture to ELF electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2000; 21(2)129–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann C. H., Schwartz Z., et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect phenotype and connexin 43 protein eexpression in MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cells and ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. J. Orthop. Res. 2003; 21(2)326–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeska R. J. Culture of osteoblastic cells. Principles of Bone Biology, J. P. Bilezikian, L. G. Raisz, G. A. Rodan. Academic Press, San Diego 1996; 1229–1237
   Google Scholar
• Mcleod B. R., Liboff A. R. Dynamic characteristics of membrane ions in multifield configurations of low-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Bioelectramagnetics 1986; 7: 177–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcleod K. J., Collazo L. Suppression of a differentiation response in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells by sustained low-level, 30 Hz magnetic-field exposure. Radiat. Res. 2000; 153(5Pt 2)706–714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu L. H., Tang X. N., et al. Effect of static magnetic field on proliferation and cell cycle of osteoblast cell. Shang Hai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2004; 13(5)469–470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quarles L. D., Yohay D. A., et al. Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine MC3T3-E1 cells in culture: an in vitro model of osteoblast development. J. Bone Min. Res. 1992; 7: 683–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman C., Lightfoot A., Amendola A. PEMF as treatment for delayed healing of foot and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25(11)771–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J. L., House D. E., Mealing G. A. Exposure of frog hearts to CW or amplitude-modulated fields: selective efflux of calcium ions at 16 Hz. Bioelectromagnetics 1990; 11: 349–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S. D., McLeod B. R., et al. Calcium cyclotron resonance and diatom mobility. Bioelectromagnetics 1987; 8: 215–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollazzo V., Traina G. C., et al. Responses of human MG-63 osteosarcoma cell line and human osteoblast-like cells to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 1997; 18(8)541–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein G. S., Lian J. B., et al. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol. Rev. 1996; 76: 593–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi Y., Nakayama K., Matsumoto T. Differentiation and cell surface expression of transforming growth factor-β receptors are regulated by interactions with matrix collagen in murine osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 3938–3944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi Y., Suzawa M., et al. Differentiation and transforming growth factor-β receptor down-regulation by collagen-α2β1 integrin interaction is mediated by focal adhesion kinase and its downstream signals in murine osteoblastic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 29309–29316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Q., Chen G., Zhao N. M. Effects of ELF electric fields on proliferation of mouse osteoblast cells. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1998; 47: 349–353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk Z. Bone healing and biochemical blood parameters after arteficial osteotomy of rabbits femur treated by low-frequency magnetic field. Ien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2001; 113(Suppl 3)47–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wertheimer N., Savitz D. A., Leeper E. Childhood cancer in relation to indicators of magnetic fields from ground current sources. Bioelectromagnetics 1995; 16: 86–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi D. T., Huang J., et al. Inhibition of gap junction intercellular communication by extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields in osteoblast-like models is dependent on cell proliferation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2002; 190: 180–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y., Ohsaki Y., et al. Effect of static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast cultures. J. Dent. Res. 2003; 82(12)962–966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar