Fatal collision? Are wireless headsets a risk in treating patients?

References

• Baan, R., Grosse, Y., Lauby-Secretan, B., et al. (2011). Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 12:624–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, L., Guxens, M., Papadopoulou, E., et al. (2017). Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child behavioral problems in five birth cohorts. Environ. Int. 104:122–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., and Goodman, R. (2009). Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 16:71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlberg, M., and Hardell, L. (2017). Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017:9218486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, W. M., Pitout, I. L., and Mabandla, M. V. (2009). The effect of electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone range on the behaviour of the rat. Metab. Brain. Dis. 24:629–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bord, J. (2014) Informed Consent. Ethics in medicine, University of Washington, School of Medicine. Available from: https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/consent.html
   Google Scholar
• Ding, G., Xie, X., Zhang, L., et al. (1998). Changes of nitric oxide synthase in hippocampus and cerebellum of the rat following exposure to electromagnetic pulse. Chin. J. Phys. Med. 20:81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Divan, H. A., Kheifets, L., Obel, C., et al. (2008). Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 19:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divan, H. A., Kheifets, L., Obel, C., et al. (2012). Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 66:524–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FCC. (2013). For Glass, Model: XEB, FCC ID: A4R-X1 Report Number: 12U14656-7A, Issue Date: 3/4/2013, Prepared for Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View. CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., and Ozkucur, N. (2009). Electromagnetic effects - From cell biology to medicine. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 43:177–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., and Carlberg, M. (2014). Mobile and cordless phone use and brain tumor risk. In: Rosch, P., eds.Bioelectromagnetic and Subtle Energy Medicine, Second Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 539–555.
   Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., and Hansson Mild, K. (2013). Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology. 20:85–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell, L., and Sage, C. (2008). Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed. Pharmacother. 62:104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, M. R., and Sage, C. (2013a). Autism and EMF/RFR? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link - Part I. Pathophysiology. 20:191–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert, M. R., and Sage, C. (2013b). Autism and EMF/RFR? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link - Part II. Pathophysiology. 20:211–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Husain, I. (2014) Why you can’t use google glass when you’re talking to a patient. IMedApps. Available from: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2014/01/google-glass-patient/#comment-425441
   Google Scholar
• International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), Guiliani, L., and Soffritti, M., eds. (2010). Non-Thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter. Bologna: Eur. J. Oncol. Libr.
   Google Scholar
• Interphone Study Group. (2010). Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 39:675–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interphone Study Group. (2011). Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. 35:453–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, O. (2007). Evidence for effects on the immune system. In: Sage, C., and Carpenter, D. O., eds.BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-Based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation (Section 8). Available from: http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec08_2007_Evidence_%20Effects_%20Immune_System.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H. (2014). Genetic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. In: Sage, C., and Carpenter, D. O., eds.Bioinitiative 2012: A Rationale for Biologically-Based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation. (section 6, pp. 1–59). Available from: http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec06_2012_genetic_effects_non-ionizing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. J., Peng, R. Y., Wang, C. Z., et al. (2015). Alterations of cognitive function and 5-HT system in rats after long term microwave exposure. Physiol. Behav. 140:236–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Xu, S., He, M., et al. (2012). Glucose administration attenuates spatial memory deficits induced by chronic low-power-density microwave exposure. Physiol. Behav. 106:631–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makary, M. A., and Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error - the third leading cause of death in the US. Bmj. 353:i2139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, A. W. (2015, February 24). Anthem: Hacked database included 78.8 million people. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/anthem-hacked-database-included-78-8-million-people-1424807364
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, J. (2014, April 15). Google glass alert: Potential health risks from wireless radiation. Prlog. Available from: https://www.prlog.org/12310450-google-glass-alert-potential-health-risks-from-wireless-radiation.html
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2008). Identification of Research Needs Relating to Potential Biological or Adverse Health Effects of Wireless Communications Devices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pizarro, Y. A. A., and De Salles, A. A. (2014). Specific absorption rates (SAR) in the head of Google glasses and bluetooth user’s. 2014 IEEE Latin-America Conference on Communications (LATINCOM), held in Cartagena, Colombia, 5-7 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sage, C., and Carpenter, D. O. (2012). Key scientific evidence and public health policy recommendations. In: Sage, C., and Carpenter, D. O., eds.BioInitiative 2012: A Rationale for Biologically-Based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation (Section 24). Available from: http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec24_2012_Key_Scientific_Studies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saikhedkar, N., Bhatnagar, M., Jain, A., et al. (2014). Effects of mobile phone radiation (900 MHz radiofrequency) on structure and functions of rat brain. Neurol. Res. 36:1072–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salford, L. G., Nittby, H., and Persson, B. R. R. (2012). Effects of electromagnetic fields from wireless communication upon the blood-brain barrier. In: Sage, C., and Carpenter, D. O., eds. Bioinitiative 2012: A Rationale for Biologically-Based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation (Section 10). Available from: http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec10_2012_Effects_Electromagnetic_Fields_Wireless_Communication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., and Drews, F. A. (2004). Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Hum. Factors. 46:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., and Crouch, D. J. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum. Factors. 48:381–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., and Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 9:23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., and Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol. Sci. 12:462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, J., Chen, S., Liu, X. M., et al. (2013). Effect of electromagnetic radiation on discharge activity of neurons in the hippocampus CA1 in rats [Article in Chinese]. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 29:423–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, H., Peng, R., Zhou, H., et al. (2013). Impairment of long-term potentiation induction is essential for the disruption of spatial memory after microwave exposure. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 84:1100–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Peng, R., Zhou, H., et al. (2015). The relationship between NMDA receptors and microwave-induced learning and memory impairment: A long term observation on wistar rats. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 91:262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. Z., Jia, Y. F., Guo, Y., et al. (1999). Influence of EMP on the nervous system of rats [Article in Chinese]. Acta Biophysica Sinica. 15:152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Yakymenko, I. (2017, July 21) How cell phone/WiFi radiation can hurt you and how to fight it. Careless Science. Dr Igor Yakymenko Blog. Available from: http://carelessscience.com/blog2017/cell-phone-wifi-radiation-can-hurt-fight/
   Google Scholar